Good Intentions
Registered User
- Mar 30, 2018
- 2,156
- 1,936
But that is the simple way of looking at it.So after 2 periods it didn't work so it's over? We were winning the entire game.
Is there no patience with Quinn? Did Kakko have to score a goal on his first shift with that line?
Devils stuck with him Hughes in that position to succeed, didn't work the first handful of games but now he looks comfortable out there.
Hockeys different here.Broke a five game losing streak, won 6-2, played our most complete game of the season, Trouba, Buchnevich, Hajek, Fox, etc... played the best games of the season, Kakko saw his firsts shifts on the first line, Lundqvist looked good, and on and on and we're dissecting Kakko's ice time vs. Hughes? Why?
Because I hate myself and needed to distract myself from work.Broke a five game losing streak, won 6-2, played our most complete game of the season, Trouba, Buchnevich, Hajek, Fox, etc... played the best games of the season, Kakko saw his firsts shifts on the first line, Lundqvist looked good, and on and on and we're dissecting Kakko's ice time vs. Hughes? Why?
Because it's a message board where people discuss things?Broke a five game losing streak, won 6-2, played our most complete game of the season, Trouba, Buchnevich, Hajek, Fox, etc... played the best games of the season, Kakko saw his firsts shifts on the first line, Lundqvist looked good, and on and on and we're dissecting Kakko's ice time vs. Hughes? Why?
Broke a five game losing streak, won 6-2, played our most complete game of the season, Trouba, Buchnevich, Hajek, Fox, etc... played the best games of the season, Kakko saw his firsts shifts on the first line, Lundqvist looked good, and on and on and we're dissecting Kakko's ice time vs. Hughes? Why?
Can you add a NWC (no Webster clause) to an existing contract?Would not take him no matter the attachment if it means Webster is a part of the deal.
Why change the lines after a good win?
Makes zero ****ing sense.
They had free flu shots at my job. Players need a better union.Great Strome playing great hockey and he comes down with the flu. And I guess kakko is gonna get bottom 6 mates now and basically no pp time
Because we should’ve taken Hughes... our scouting blows!Broke a five game losing streak, won 6-2, played our most complete game of the season, Trouba, Buchnevich, Hajek, Fox, etc... played the best games of the season, Kakko saw his firsts shifts on the first line, Lundqvist looked good, and on and on and we're dissecting Kakko's ice time vs. Hughes? Why?
Strome confirmed to have flu today.
Strome confirmed to have flu today.
Strome confirmed to have flu today.
2C Greg McKegg DA GAWD“Oh, wow, I really like these—wait, is that a 14?”
I actually support that move. I've liked Trouba a lot at ES, but he shoots absolutely way too much from the point on the powerplay for him to be a good PPQB since they're mostly low-percentage shots. I know this seems a bit hypocritical since Tony has an iCF/60 of almost 30 right now on the powerplay“Oh, wow, I really like these—wait, is that a 14?”
I like the 3rd line. Not a fan of taking Trouba off the PP1. Doesn’t he lead the team in shots? And we’re replacing him with DeAngelo’s muffin?