How Chris Drury needs to meet this moment of Rangers crisis with entitled core that keeps failing
The Rangers do not play again until Friday when the Penguins come to the Garden, but the next three days will be the most critical of a season that is fast becoming a sinkhole.
President and general manager Chris Drury has the responsibility to hold a heart-to-heart with his team, both as a collective unit and in one-on-one meetings, to determine who exactly wants to be here and who is too butt-hurt to play for his teammates.
The standard of play at the Garden on Monday was actually the best it’s been for a couple of weeks, but the Rangers still were drubbed by the Devils 5-1 for their sixth regulation loss in the last seven games.
There were turnovers in the most deadly areas, there were odd-man rushes and breakaways early that led to an almost immediate 2-0 deficit that the Blueshirts were unable to overcome. It didn’t help at all that this was the night that Igor Shesterkin, under siege nearly all season, not only bent but broke while outplayed decisively at the other end by Jacob Markstrom.
There was an unusually lengthy delay between the end of the game and head coach Peter Laviolette’s press briefing. There were no bombshells but we can all assume that Laviolette did not get lost on his way through the corridor.
Moments of crisis have arrived on Broadway even before the lighting of the tree at Rockefeller Center.
Where have you gone Neil Smith and John Muckler?
The team’s season-long scattered play has nose-dived through this stretch, the last five games of which followed the now infamous “memo” distributed through the league in which Drury announced that, among others, Jacob Trouba and Chris Kreider were available.
A little bit about that. We have learned from an industry source that Drury did not send out a “memo,” but rather posted a message through Subtext that connects the NHL’s 32 GM’s. We are told that this type of message containing sensitive information is not unique.
I have said that I believe this was a mistake and that Drury should have addressed the team before taking that action. No one wants to see his name thrown around in trade rumors by his GM. But it happens regularly. It is part of the business, albeit an unattractive one.
But when the contents of the message became public, the team seemed to go into a fetal position. These are good people, but for a veteran group, it has reacted as immaturely as possible. There somehow is a strain of victimization running through the team. It seems everywhere you turn, there is an aggrieved party.
I’d heard at the start of camp that there was bitterness over the way Barclay Goodrow was waived to San Jose just about two weeks after the Rangers were eliminated by the Panthers. That’s come up again over the last week.
It’s absurd. The Rangers needed to clear space. Everyone knew they were going to try to extricate themselves from Goodrow’s contract. Drury accomplished that, but apparently it was bad form not to notify the veteran until a few minutes before he actually was put on the waiver list.
What are we talking about here? Goodrow was not sent to the gulag. He was sent to San Jose. Since when does a general manager have that kind of obligation? Would an hour before have been sufficient? Or maybe Drury should have given Goodrow 48 or 72 hours to process it.
It’s ridiculous. This is pro sports. This is big business. The Rangers acted within their CBA rights. Does anyone think Lou Lamoriello was touchy-feely with his guys while presiding over a Devils team that won three Cups in nine years from 1995 to 2003?
I like and respect these players as individuals. They are good people. But there’s something off with the group. There is a sense of entitlement. There is a sense of comfortability. Maybe it’s because of the big-money contracts, maybe it’s because of the plethora of no-move and no-move trade clauses.
But it is unbecoming. This core — and again, filled with people I generally like — has never won a thing unless you want to count the Presidents’ Trophy that no one does.
Trouba knew within days of the Rangers’ elimination that they were going to do everything in their power to trade him in order to clear cap space and remodel the team to as great an extent as possible. He did everything in his power to block it and turn a five-year no-move into a six-year no-move.
Now about a month into the season, he knows that they still want to trade him. It has become untenable to have a lame-duck captain who is detached. I know the personal scenario but every player in the league has a personal scenario.
Why he wants to remain in a place where he is obviously not wanted strikes me as counterproductive to everyone’s health and to the Rangers’ ability to stop this slide before they are all buried alive.
I don’t think Laviolette or his staff have a particularly good handle on this. There is almost no stability. Vincent Trocheck played between two sets of wingers over last year’s 82 games. He has played with five sets of wingers within the first 24 games of this year.
But it’s the players, it’s the core who are failing. It’s the players, it’s the core who have been such a disappointment.
They may think they can prove a point by quitting on Drury, but if that is the case, they are only quitting on themselves.
The Rangers have three days before their next game. They are the most important three days of the season.
Who is in and who wants out?
That’s the issue Drury must resolve.