JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 79,990
- 17,592
Roster Building Thread - Part XII
- Thread starter Leonardo87
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
Shesterkybomb
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2016
- 17,489
- 19,154
Wonder will they dare to keep Mancini after Lindgren is back and scratch the captain from time to time, would go a long way to making him accept a trade next year
- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,900
- 22,768
I doubt it. For one, we are currently using LTIR to fit Mancini on the roster. If we keep him once Lindgren is back, then we have to send down one of the forwards. I'm sure you'd be okay with waiving Brodzinski, but I doubt Drury/Lavi will agree. That means one of Edstrom or Rempe would have to go down.
Mancini has played all of 18 games as a pro. He won't be hurt by spending time in Hartford, and he'll be the first call up if and one someone gets hurt.
eco's bones
Registered User
I think some people worry about Trouba too much. Don't think there's much doubt he'll be moving next summer with only one year of term left and I expect the Rangers are going to re-sign Igor--$12 mil or bust. They'll do it. Rangers have 3 RD in Fox, Schneider and Mancini so that won't be a problem either. But anyway I don't think Drury will be f***ing around with any ifs, ands or buts this time. He's forewarned so it's a matter of dotting I's and crossing t's.
That doesn't mean the Rangers won't look to pick up a vet D on their left side.
That doesn't mean the Rangers won't look to pick up a vet D on their left side.
I don't know anything about him, but the bottom 6 looks pretty crowded already and that's with Vesey on IR. Is he enough of a difference to risk what we already have going on waivers, or sending back Rempe/Edstrom? Seems like we'd be claiming him just to waive him again
On the one hand this analysis is flawless
On the other hand, it presupposes Vesey is better than RempEd which is not the case
OR
Vesey is not better than RempEd, but they don't care b'c rather than deal Vesey for a lower pick, they want to keep him around, even if it means sending a better player down.
NO
stop the bs
deal Vesey NOW
did Vegas, who claimed him, waive?
If he can be grabbed we should.
Good prospect and he is a PIVOT
We can cut Korzackm[sp] and if that's a prob no takers, deal him + a 6th for a 7th
No we can find room for him in the A while eventually Brodz or other is replaced
EDIT
apparently LV waived + EDM claimed and put him back on waivers??????????
so yeah
CLAIM HIM
Last edited:
- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,900
- 22,768
This is the right answer. Management wants to win. Teams need depth to deal with injuries and Vesey provides that depth. A late round pick won't help for many years, if ever.
Rempe and Edstrom aren't going anywhere. Both will get ample chance to play, regardless of Vesey being on the team.
If that is yr take on right answer, I respectfully disagree to extent of 'Vesey provides that depth' in that to whatev extent that is true [compared to other options], he is not worth taking mins from RempEd
I agree about late pick being a long shot
this is about addition by subtraction
Kords
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2019
- 7,455
- 12,913
jerseyjinx94
I jinx players.
Synergy27
F-A-C-G-C-E
Am I crazy, or does it feel like the NHL media is really pushing the Rangers as Cup favorites this year? I’m definitely a conspiracy theorist, so I’m going to remember this and call it scripted if they win.
17futurecap
Registered User
Locking Laf up for his 24-31 year old seasons right now seems like a great idea, get it done Drury.
- Nov 2, 2011
- 7,903
- 8,198
8 years and less than 9 would be a pretty good contract for Laf
Circus86
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2020
- 2,691
- 5,416
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
Doubt they do but the Oilers had to put him back on waivers so that means one of the like 10 teams that are above them In waiver priority claimed too. Rangers on that list
Mac n Gs
Drury plz
- Jan 17, 2014
- 22,835
- 13,558
They had the 4th best betting odds to win the Cup and are returning essentially an identical President’s Trophy winning roster. Nobody is as down on this team as its own fans are, but they’re objectively a good team
EF on 32T. Igor wants $12M-$12.5M. He wants to be the highest paid player on the team.
CBA expires in 2026. New agreement will bring a big jump to the cap.
$92.5M next season and big jump in 26-27. EF said some people are thinking/hoping the NHL rips up the last season of the CBA. Bettman said earlier this at the BOG meeting that they are hoping to announce a new CBA before the Cup final. Some people hope the new CBA would start next season and not in two seasons. Gary isn't doing that.
CBA expires in 2026. New agreement will bring a big jump to the cap.
$92.5M next season and big jump in 26-27. EF said some people are thinking/hoping the NHL rips up the last season of the CBA. Bettman said earlier this at the BOG meeting that they are hoping to announce a new CBA before the Cup final. Some people hope the new CBA would start next season and not in two seasons. Gary isn't doing that.
Last edited:
McRanger92
Registered User
- Jun 7, 2017
- 14,121
- 26,267
8 mil for Laf through his 20s with a rising cap will be one of the best contracts in the league if/when he signs it.
- Sep 20, 2007
- 8,369
- 13,356
The fact that he's in talks for a team friendly contract after the last couple years - no powerplay time, team isn't maximizing his production ect. He must love being a Ranger. I wish other guys on the team would have the same attitude.
Atax
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 6,051
- 7,629
Mr 12.5 will enjoy Columbus.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
How aggressive should the Leafs be at the deadline? New Poll Option Added
- Latest: LEAFANFORLIFE23
-
-
