Machinehead
Fox Mafia Consigliere
45 will be retired worldwide in honor of Luke Voit36 will probably be available too![]()
45 will be retired worldwide in honor of Luke Voit36 will probably be available too![]()
AFAIK Chytil chose 72 as that is the year his father was born (mine too actually, then again I am 7 months older than Chytil). I also don't think that it is an ugly number at all, anything in the 70s is hot.
Once he proves he's not Shane Spencer Part Two, he can have a global number retirement.45 will be retired worldwide in honor of Luke Voit
I think you should get one just for being Shane Spencer. That shit was fun.Once he proves he's not Shane Spencer Part Two, he can have a global number retirement.
Panarin wears 27 for Russia so I would assume he would take that
These are some quotes from Gorton
9/6
https://nypost.com/2018/09/06/rangers-second-year-studs-in-middle-of-center-glut/
Someone needs to ask Gorton how this is going to work in the future.
The 49ers started two rookie corners in 1981. They won.
The Yankees played Torres and Andujar. A team which nearly made the World Series last season. If they were the Rangers, they would have traded o signed some veteran player with a huge contract. They have an excellent chance at reaching the World Series in the next month with Torres and Andujar. If Frazier didn't have serious concussion issues, he would played a big role on this team with the injuries suffered in the OF. The Yankees had to trade for McCutchen because they had so many issues there.
The Rangers tell us high they are on Andersson and then they tell us they don't have a top 9 role for Andersson at center. Why not? Because they didn't trade Hayes three months ago. What's his long term future with this team? The Rangers have Mika who is better. The Rangers have three young centers who will be better.
What do the Niners from 1981 have to do with the Rangers..? Or the Yankees?
Should we research what successful Cricket teams in India are doing and replicate their blueprint to success?
Why are so many people here in such a rush? Lias is 19. For all we know he’ll be up with the club by the Holidays. And even if he’s not, some of y’all need to be patient.
What do the Niners from 1981 have to do with the Rangers..? Or the Yankees?
Should we research what successful Cricket teams in India are doing and replicate their blueprint to success?
Why are so many people here in such a rush? Lias is 19. For all we know he’ll be up with the club by the Holidays. And even if he’s not, some of y’all need to be patient.
What do the Niners from 1981 have to do with the Rangers..? Or the Yankees?
Should we research what successful Cricket teams in India are doing and replicate their blueprint to success?
Why are so many people here in such a rush? Lias is 19. For all we know he’ll be up with the club by the Holidays. And even if he’s not, some of y’all need to be patient.
I think this is it for Staal. Either he plays somewhat ably or he's benched. And then, I think he's gone after this year. This is like a last-gasp, Hail Mary, hope the guy shows something to someone and consents to a trade. And if not, he's bought out after the year.
It's frustrating and counterproductive having him occupy a spot a kid could have, but it's a rebuilding year so just having a **** player with a big cap hit isn't otherwise an issue. But then when I believe we'll start ramping up our efforts to be competitive next season, he'll have to go. Unless, of course, everyone is horrible this year and none of the young defensemen look remotely ready, then maybe he's here one more year. I don't anticipate that, though, as honestly I think either Hajek or Lindgren could be on the team right now.
For me, its sort of less about Andersson and more about how - despite lip service and a fancy letter to fans - the Rangers will always lack the stomach for a rebuild with the subsequent growing pains. This top 9 is still littered with veterans, so is the defense. I dont know, for a team with little to no expectations, I'd rather see the kids play...especially the draftee that the Rangers pumped as the most NHL ready in 2017.
Yeah, it would be much easier to trade those guys, given one is a very good young player entering his prime and the other is a steady veteran defenseman (excluding last season's fluke) with a reasonable deal. They're both better players than Staal and neither has an NMC. So, I'm not really sure why we're even discussing them. It would be easier to trade almost everyone on our team than Staal.I doubt it. I think it would be much easier to trade Smith or Skjei than trade or buy out Staal. And it seems like he is playing well again.
Meh, tough one - particularly when it comes to Andersson. Hayes, Zibs, Chytil, Howden are all 26 and under and Lias isn't being groomed to be a 4C. Nowhere to put the guy and that's not because of McCleod or Beleskey. You've got to have some veterans on the team.
Staal bothers me, though. He should be in the press box at this point. Shattenkirk and McQuaid don't bother me at all for differing reasons - Shattenkirk can/is a lynch pin on the power play and McQuaid is a vet D/great teammate that'll stick up for Henrik, etc...
Staal's contract is a big driver into the Rangers needing to force themselves to believe he can be a solid bottom-pairing mentor type. Personally, I don't think he'll excel in either role, but the Rangers really dont have a choice at this point.
Yeah, it would be much easier to trade those guys, given one is a very good young player entering his prime and the other is a steady veteran defenseman (excluding last season's fluke) with a reasonable deal. They're both better players than Staal and neither has an NMC. So, I'm not really sure why we're even discussing them. It would be easier to trade almost everyone on our team than Staal.
Staal sucks. I have stuck up for him for a really long time, including last season when I'd cling to his once-every-ten-games moment of decent play. But, he sucks. And he looked terrible this exhibition season. He's gotta go. He's a warrior, I love his effort, all that, just like Girardi who was one of my favorite players. But he sucks, badly, and I'd be really surprised if he played for us next year.
The Rangers are going about this the right way, especially without a teenager that’s ready to step in and take over a team. It’s been like 15 months since they made their first 1st round pick since 2012, it’s not like the system is chock full of guys that unquestionably ready to be full time NHLers, the vets are there to insulate them so they’re not forced into something they can’t handle. The team sold at the deadline last season, and will probably do it again this season, are they the impatient ones or is it you?For me, its sort of less about Andersson and more about how - despite lip service and a fancy letter to fans - the Rangers will always lack the stomach for a rebuild with the subsequent growing pains. This top 9 is still littered with veterans, so is the defense. I dont know, for a team with little to no expectations, I'd rather see the kids play...especially the draftee that the Rangers pumped as the most NHL ready in 2017.