JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 79,463
- 16,898
So, it’s not a coincidence that we traded Staal and now news is coming out about NYR/Eichel. Right?
D+1 | 9gm/1pt | 58gm/21pt |
D+2 | 42gm/20pt | 81gm/39pt |
D+3 | 69gm/33pt | 82gm/39pt |
4 | 80gm/46pt | 72gm/45pt |
5 | 81gm/51pt | 81gm/44pt |
—— | Traded | Traded |
7 | 56gm/37pt | 81gm/78pt |
8 | 72gm/47pt | 70gm/54pt |
9 | 82gm/74pt | |
10 | 57gm/75pt |
What is he insinuating tht the tweet doesn’t say lol. We clearly have interest in Eichelthey shouldn’t. Giving up a huge amount of assets for a 10m contract is stupid at this stage.
also the tweets don’t say what you’re insinuating they say.
The NYR called about his availability. They are clearly interested and its their job to make it work. They wouldnt call if they didnt think they could.
What don’t they say? It literally says the NYR were one of the teams that called regarding availability...
As I responded already, I am not sure how I feel about it, but just because you dont want it to happen doesnt mean there isnt some truth to it.
I don’t know how we’d get Eichel without trading major pieces in our current/future plans. But by Bob’s commentary, it seems Buffalo has no real reason to shop Eichel. Imteresting we were the only team mentioned.
I'm not entirely surprised he may have requested a trade. His right. As for the Rangers interest I can't see it but they certainly might inquire. The price would be very high, the future payroll issues would be very difficult and it creates a ton of questions for the future. You've already got one $11MM player, another on two years away from $10MM and a boatload of young stars with very high upsides. I can make the money work for 2-3 years but then what? Interested in hearing what else comes out today. At some point I'll spill some of what I've heard.@bobbop - your thoughts on this? I know you've been very vocal about your stance on Eichel and how there is a lot the public doesn't know about him being a major part of the problem in Buffalo
And I am not certain how “for” or “against it” I am to be honest because of the surrounding factors. Acquisition cost + Cap navigation now and in the future. It would likely mean the end of Zibanejad in 2 years when he needs a new contract.
I would imagine a package could include pieces such as Strome/Buch, DeAngelo, 1st round pick, and go from there.
But having a 1-2 of Zib-Eichel down the middle is a combo you can win a cup with.
Trading Laf for Eichel in this cap era would be stupid beyond belief.@Edge said the Rangers have been talking to Buffalo, and have been talking about the 1st overall, so naturally that would have to include Eichel
Gorton is doing his due diligence, I don't expect a trade to go down for him though
Ok yes, but can we agree that anyone who would trade futures to acquire Smith and then allow him to refuse a trade to half the league can't be trusted to not give Dillon a NMC?Kreider, Zibanajad, Panarin and Trouba got them because they are established cornerstone players. Smith has a modified no-trade clause, not a NMC. Much different. DeAngelo can't get any type of protection for at least another three years.
Eichel would have to be some combo of ADA, Chytil, Kravstov, Miller or Lundkvist and the 22 OA right?
No. Different place, different time.Ok yes, but can we agree that anyone who would trade futures to acquire Smith and then allow him to refuse a trade to half the league can't be trusted to not give Dillon a NMC?
From what i've read the Flames fans still love him and feel like he is one of their best players. How willing to overpay for him would you be?
I think he would be terrific behind Mika but I'm pretty sure Georgiev and Buch is not getting it done.
@Edge said the Rangers have been talking to Buffalo, and have been talking about the 1st overall, so naturally that would have to include Eichel
Gorton is doing his due diligence, I don't expect a trade to go down for him though