Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LVIII

Status
Not open for further replies.

broadwayblue

Registered User
Mar 4, 2004
20,084
1,857
NYC
What is the idea about getting Pietrangelo? Guy is gonna want 9 million plus in a flat cap. Why the hell did we go out and spend 8 million plus Pionk plus McMichael for Trouba? This is what I am really worried about. Making multiple mistakes with guys making lots of money. We gave Panarin his money (obviously fine with it). We gave Kreider his money (we've debated it to death if that was a good move) and we gave Trouba big money (Jury still out). I don't think we should or can take a chance on Pietrangelo. And obviously the term worries me even more.

Can't see this happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bl02

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
Anyone the think there's a chance that freeing up the $5.7 from moving Staal allows them to keep Fast? I know he's not a superstar but I would try to hold onto a guy like that as long as his ask isn't ridiculous
would totally be fine with that. 3-4 year deal? If he's gonna want more than that I think we are better off finding someone cheaper or hoping guys like Barron/Lemieux really pan out for bottom 6.
Fast is 28 but playing his style is he gonna be effective when he's 32 plus?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vaheh

Avery16

Shake my hand, fatso
Jun 28, 2015
12,908
8,666
Brooklyn
Dillon is not a top pairing D. He's getting 3.27 now, which is fair value for what he does. His next contract will be more than 4 million. That might be fair also. At 4.5, it'll depend on how many years and what kind of trade protections he'd require. He's kind of a better but much more expensive version of Lindgren, and will likely be overpaid on the next contract, won't ever be good enough to fill 1LD. I dont think he's a good fit.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
I dont think Gorton will give Strome 5 million for any years

Move ADA to LD, and there isnt much to talk about.
Yeah I'm still hoping Strome takes a 1-2 year deal at less than 5. If he puts up the numbers like he put up with Panarin then he should get another pay day when he's done.
 

Inferno

Registered User
Nov 27, 2005
29,682
7,950
Atlanta, GA
Just wondering...if barkov was available what would a potential deal look like?

chytil, 22, kravtsov, deangelo, Robertson? Something like that?
 

NYSPORTS

back afta dis. . .
Jun 17, 2019
7,993
4,459
We're drafting our next captain in 8 days.

he has all the makings of a Captain from what i’ve read. Not sure he’ll be ready out of the gate being he’s likely the only player who needs introduction to the subway.
 

RGY

Kreid or Die
Jul 18, 2005
24,768
14,042
Long Island, NY
They've been tracking Dillon for a while and he is very much on the Rangers radar.
My cap for Dillon would be 4 years and $4-$4.5 AAV. Now of course you can have a team come in and overpay for him. And at that point we need to move on. But I am heavy on the Dillon train. Really want him and his makeup as part of this team moving forward.


Also side note, Frank Seravelli is saying Krug has turned down Boston’s latest offer of 6 years @ $6.5 AAV. Didnt want this guy before that and definitely dont want him beyond that. Just no.
 

bobbop

Henrik & Pop
Sponsor
May 27, 2004
14,554
21,194
Now, Suburban Phoenix. Then, Long Island
My cap for Dillon would be 4 years and $4-$4.5 AAV. Now of course you can have a team come in and overpay for him. And at that point we need to move on. But I am heavy on the Dillon train. Really want him and his makeup as part of this team moving forward.


Also side note, Frank Seravelli is saying Krug has turned down Boston’s latest offer of 6 years @ $6.5 AAV. Didnt want this guy before that and definitely dont want him beyond that. Just no.
The Rangers could potentially sign Dillon and expose him in the expansion draft a year from now.

Another left defense (stopgap) thought. Andy Greene was excellent for the Islanders in the playoffs. On a 1-2 year deal, he could be of interest to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DutchShamrock

Avery16

Shake my hand, fatso
Jun 28, 2015
12,908
8,666
Brooklyn
The Rangers could potentially sign Dillon and expose him in the expansion draft a year from now.

Another left defense (stopgap) thought. Andy Greene was excellent for the Islanders in the playoffs. On a 1-2 year deal, he could be of interest to me.
I feel like most UFAs, especially the notable ones like Dillon, will insist on NMCs to avoid this. Also, the idea of signing big contracts and hoping for Seattle to bail us out is a losing one.
 

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
11,886
23,583
Dallas
I really like the idea of adding Elias Lindholm. I don’t know why people see it as so underwhelming. He’s not flashy, but he’s not on a very different trajectory than Mika either. Finished 9th in Selke voting last year. Got votes this year as well. Career 52% on draws, plays a good amount of PK, over 2 minutes per game to lead Flames forwards. Had a down year production wise but so did the entire team, he was only 7 points off the lead. From all indications he’s a work horse and was the most consistent Flame night in and out. He’s on a great contract and would give us an exceptional 1-2 C punch.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,332
11,456
Dillon is really good actually. Has been a solid top pair shutdown guy for years. Way, way better than a plug like Edmundson at least.
I don’t remember Dillon having good seasons back to back pretty much ever.
 

Trxjw

Retired.
May 8, 2007
28,334
11,205
Land of no calls..
I can see the appeal with Dillon for the Rangers. Not a lights out, top-pairing caliber guy on a cup contender but he's more than passable in the short term and you hope he can insulate guys like Miller, Reunanen, etc, until someone bumps him off the top pairing. I do question whether or not they can get into the conversation with him without going to 5 or even 6 years on a contract, which is something I'd rather not do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTakedown

Anthony5967

Registered User
Dec 24, 2015
7,763
5,491
Strong Island, NY
If Chytil can't develop into a 2C, he better be a high-end 3C is all I'm going to say. People all over trading Strome, a guy who clicked and played with Panarin, both smashing career-high paces and numbers. if Strome wants $5M for 3 years, you have to do it, in my opinion. You don't sit there and move Strome who fit in well and when Chytil doesn't elevate himself to a 2C role, then what do you do? Knowing some, they'll blame Gorton lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTakedown

NYRangers0723

Registered User
Apr 30, 2019
2,817
1,928
insane overpayment

Mayyyybe Chytil, Robertson, and a 1st.
. Agreed. Some fans all of a sudden ez to to go back to 2012-16 when we traded tons of picks/ prospects. Look I understand we want to win right now but we gotta see the rebuild through. It’s going really well so far but let’s no abandon it
 
  • Like
Reactions: bl02

NYSPORTS

back afta dis. . .
Jun 17, 2019
7,993
4,459
Just wondering...if barkov was available what would a potential deal look like?

chytil, 22, kravtsov, deangelo, Robertson? Something like that?

The issue i have is the Rangers might rebuild the Blackhawks post Cups. Heavy comp for a few and nothing behind them.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
I really like the idea of adding Elias Lindholm. I don’t know why people see it as so underwhelming. He’s not flashy, but he’s not on a very different trajectory than Mika either. Finished 9th in Selke voting last year. Got votes this year as well. Career 52% on draws, plays a good amount of PK, over 2 minutes per game to lead Flames forwards. Had a down year production wise but so did the entire team, he was only 7 points off the lead. From all indications he’s a work horse and was the most consistent Flame night in and out. He’s on a great contract and would give us an exceptional 1-2 C punch.

From what i've read the Flames fans still love him and feel like he is one of their best players. How willing to overpay for him would you be?
I think he would be terrific behind Mika but I'm pretty sure Georgiev and Buch is not getting it done.
 

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,436
8,774
I really like the idea of adding Elias Lindholm. I don’t know why people see it as so underwhelming. He’s not flashy, but he’s not on a very different trajectory than Mika either. Finished 9th in Selke voting last year. Got votes this year as well. Career 52% on draws, plays a good amount of PK, over 2 minutes per game to lead Flames forwards. Had a down year production wise but so did the entire team, he was only 7 points off the lead. From all indications he’s a work horse and was the most consistent Flame night in and out. He’s on a great contract and would give us an exceptional 1-2 C punch.

Depending on the cost he seems like he'd be a good add for 2C. You don't trade for him to be your 1C but you don't need him to be. He's on a good contract for another 4 years, in his prime, seems like he'd be a great fit.
But what would Calgary ask/do they really want to trade him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad