RangersFan1994
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2019
- 17,992
- 14,700
yes.
the Staal trade was weird and clearly something that was foreshadowing a bigger move.
the 1OA wouldn’t be on the table. JD would never allow for it. Ditto Kakko.
now Chytil/DeAngelo/Strome/Howden/Buch/22OA/ any of the other prospects? Yeah.
Strome, DeAngelo, Chytil and 22 for Eichel and McCabe ?? too much fair value??
Well he's better, younger, and locked in for longer, and if they get Eichel without giving up Zibanejad, it'd be way harder to keep Zibanejad in two years when his contract is upThere is no point in adding Eichel if it costs Zibanejad
I don't see how A) Buffalo would do it, or B) it would be the best offer for Eichel otherwise
But since no one decided to post the follow up McKenzie tweets, he also said Eichel doesn't want out and Buffalo doesn't want to trade him and they're both on the same page of wanting to get better sooner rather than later
They're not acquiring Eichel to play one of those three on the third line.
Maybe he was only able to get confirmation on us, and not the other teamsI have to agree with others in that it is very odd the Rangers were the only team mentioned. Very odd.
That’s why you trade Mika to at least get something back. Eichel has a really good contract for a player of his caliber. Mika would get more assuming he doesn’t crash and burn.Well he's better, younger, and locked in for longer, and if they get Eichel without giving up Zibanejad, it'd be way harder to keep Zibanejad in two years when his contract is up
He specifically said “if you take this information at face value”I don't see how A) Buffalo would do it, or B) it would be the best offer for Eichel otherwise
But since no one decided to post the follow up McKenzie tweets, he also said Eichel doesn't want out and Buffalo doesn't want to trade him and they're both on the same page of wanting to get better sooner rather than later
The player wants out. He does have a heavy cap hit. I think you are looking at only handful of teams that can absorb the cap hit and still function for the next few years with the flat cap, as well as have the assets to satisfy BUF moving the player. Now being only one of a handful of teams, I think it also means the Rangers would not have to trade 1OA or Kakko in the deal.
No. The point is to upgrade the Center position. Trading Zibanejad for Eichel does not make them better. It keeps them the same. Its just one in/one out. Don’t think Zibanejad is going to get more money than Eichel either.Well he's better, younger, and locked in for longer, and if they get Eichel without giving up Zibanejad, it'd be way harder to keep Zibanejad in two years when his contract is up
if the player request the trade their value goes down especially with a cap hit that he hasI would think the offer would have to start with Kakko. That's the part that makes me ill.
No. The point is to upgrade the Center position. Trading Zibanejad for Eichel does not make them better. It keeps them the same. Its just one in/one out. Don’t think Zibanejad is going to get more money than Eichel either.
They’re in the first stage of grief.Buffalo forum has closed down the Eichel thread lol
Well again, he's better so he is an upgrade alone. Zibanejad's not going to get more, but the team is going to have to pay Kakko, Fox, and Lafreniere tooNo. The point is to upgrade the Center position. Trading Zibanejad for Eichel does not make them better. It keeps them the same. Its just one in/one out. Don’t think Zibanejad is going to get more money than Eichel either.
They could use him for one, make an effort to sign him, and then trade him.Why would Zibanejad resign with the Sabres? If he had five years left on his deal maybe he'd be in play.