Not true.Bjugstad has exceeded 14 points once in the last 6 seasons.
Ignoring totals, Strome’s point per game was also higher than Bjugstad’s in 4 of the 5 seasons prior to Panarin.
Strome is coming off a career year and proven chemistry. Totals, pace, no matter how you cut it, there’s no reasonable argument that Bjugstad steps in at 2C as a more productive player.
For the record, I’m still on the “we need an upgrade at 2C” wagon.
In 2018-19, Bjugstad had 12 points with florida and 14 points with pittsburgh for a total of 26 points. The previous season, he had 49. In 2015-16, he had 34. In 2014-15, 43. Thats exceeding 14 points four times in the last six seasons, this season hampered by a back injury.
Another argument is that at 2 million, Bjugstad, only one year older than Strome, could match or come close to Strome's Panarin-assisted output at substantial savings compared to what Strome will make next season.