Roster Building thread - Part IX - (2024 edition)

Status
Not open for further replies.
100% because of his role and who he plays with.

55 and 8 are problems #1 and 2. 21 is a distant #3.

View attachment 820856

Never a good sign when your most frequent partner is a full 7+% better than you are.

Also anger inducing because who knows where Fox would be with a legit partner.
a shrewd move would be to trade Lindgren for that upgrade but that's not happening..... and its why I don't like our chances in the long run.

Replacing Gus is a lateral move at best. Replacing Lindgren is a massive improvement right now

Lindgren + 2025 conditional 1st for Chychrun. So be it
 
I’m sorry, so you are not allowed to use hindsight to expect Kreider to become 35ish goal player (though one could argue that it was possible to predict this increase), but you can use hindsight to know that the cap would remain flat contrary to all expectations at that time?
Any deal signed before March 2020 is very hard to judge. Nobody knew the cap was going to go be flat due to a league shutdown. That being said, Kreider has outperformed his deal massively.

Now that the cap will be going up, you hope his eventual decline in play is masked by the cap going up. By the end of the deal, he will be 36. His game has matured more and more. He is less reliant on being the speed demon he was, but he's still fast. His passing is significantly better than it used to be. Dare I say his shot is different than it was coming into the league. His first goal last night is not one he would bury in the past.

We've asked forever to draft, develop, and utilize a home grown skater to the most of their ability. Kreider is that guy. Okay, it's not a 100 point franchise player, but is without a doubt top line winger and will be for a significant stretch of his career. He's hitting 300 goals this season and will be 2nd in franchise history in goals by the end of next season.

If his decline is not steep, he may end at #1. After a while, the cap hit doesn't matter. He should be a career Ranger and the last one to wear #20.
 

Staple:
There was a report recently that the Rangers’ 2024 first is off the table this deadline because Rangers owner Jim Dolan is hosting the NHL Draft at The Sphere, Madison Square Garden’s new structure in Las Vegas. We’re told that’s not the case, so Drury is seemingly free to investigate deals that involve this June’s first-round pick.

For a player who fills a need beyond just this season, there are a few factors at play. The Flyers would likely covet a young forward coming back for Laughton; this doesn’t seem like a spot to dangle Kaapo Kakko, who could haunt the Rangers for a lot longer than Laughton would haunt the Flyers if included in this deal. The Flyers already have the Panthers’ first-rounder coming their way in June. Perhaps the better deal for both sides is a lottery-protected 2025 first, with the Rangers preserving their 2024 first and the Flyers getting a shot at a better pick than one likely in the mid-to-late 20s this year.

Adding Laughton’s $3-million cap hit the next two seasons might also hasten a decision on Barclay Goodrow this summer. Goodrow has three years left at a $3.6-million cap hit and a summer buyout leaves a $3.5-million crater on the team’s cap for 2026-27, but actually saves $247,000 on next season’s cap. Laughton is a true center who could anchor the Rangers’ checking line for a couple of years, a role Goodrow has struggled with this season.

That Drury is serious about adding a bit more bite and edge to his forward group while not sacrificing skill. Players like Laughton, even though he turns 30 in three months, don’t come available often, especially with a decent contract attached. It makes sense that the Rangers would see Laughton as a short- and long-term solution. It could force a move on Goodrow, who costs too much against the cap for his role, plus it gives the Rangers a bottom-six safety net if Filip Chytil isn’t on target to return next season.

Of the available centers, Laughton is an intriguing one for the Rangers. Stay tuned.
200w.gif
 
Last edited:
a shrewd move would be to trade Lindgren for that upgrade but that's not happening..... and its why I don't like our chances in the long run.

Replacing Gus is a lateral move at best. Replacing Lindgren is a massive improvement right now

Lindgren + 2025 conditional 1st for Chychrun. So be it
Ottawa is not the team to dump Lindgren on, they have enough LHD.
 
Still say we should consider MoJo:


Cap hit is digestible, plays either c or w, controls play pretty well in all situations. What’s not to like? Guerin is running a low key fire sale anyway.
 
I mean, still don't really see many people as having a clear idea of what Drury is into and I still dont' think they'd get into a bidding war for someone like Laughton
 
If any GM gives up a 1st for a player like Laughton, they should be introduced to a firing squad.Thats just all kinds of crazy

The Laughton stuff is just Briere and Jonesy trying to capitalize on a team's desperation to add a center, regardless of quality. Why are they talking about re-signing their rentals but they are trading a team leader under contract for 2 more years? If he is so great why not keep him? I call BS, especially on the Rangers being interested. The idea of Laughton (3C with some size who can play with an edge) is much better than the player Laughton.

Go for Gourde or Dowd. Eller is an option on the low end if they are comfortable with Vesey on Meatka's wing
 
Rumor has it that University at Michigan captain Jacob Truscott is not going to sign with Vancouver and will be a UFA after his Senior season (this year). He's a LD with pretty respectable stats over the last few years. He's mainly a 2-way guy so stats won't pop. 6'1.

The Rangers sure could use EVERY solid d-man that's available...


SeasonTeamLgeGPGAPtsPIM+/-GPGAPtsPIM
2018-19U.S. National Under-17 TeamExhibition22369146
2018-19U.S. National Under-17 TeamUSHL3326820-1121120
2019-20U.S. National Under-18 TeamUSHL19471165
2020-21U. of MichiganBig-102614586
2021-22U. of MichiganBig-1040215173128
2022-23U. of MichiganBig-102341216128
2023-24U. of MichiganBig-102821113375
 
Not a surprise there. A shame. Do note, Larry's tweet is a bit misleading. The article states "out for the regular season" (also this wording used by Baugh from the Athletic. So there might be a chance of getting him back during the playoffs.
 
A broken leg would be 6-8 weeks and then rehab. It's POSSIBLE he could come back in the playoffs but it all depends on the severity of the injury and his rehab process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad