MarkMessyay11
Registered User
TB didn't get much in return but they freed up the money. Flat cap.
Cap space is a premium asset, unfortunately…
TB didn't get much in return but they freed up the money. Flat cap.
How is that insane? Paul was an absolute fantastic player in the playoffs, sergachev is completely ready for a top 4 spot, and the Paul contract is far from insane. He's a good player, they gave term, he gave a lower aav. I have no doubt he could've signed for 4+ on the open market.Yeah, and like you’ve said before, getting rid of McDonagh to give Nick Paul an absolutely insane contract isn’t necessarily a good thing.
How is that insane? Paul was an absolute fantastic player in the playoffs, sergachev is completely ready for a top 4 spot, and the Paul contract is far from insane. He's a good player, they gave term, he gave a lower aav. I have no doubt he could've signed for 4+ on the open market.
That g7 kept the Leafs pathetic losing streak alive so he deserves all the praise in the world imoNick Paul's playoff performance may be the most overrated thing ever.
Its like people remember g7 vs Toronto and attach that to the rest of the run. Like he was certainly good for his role, but he wasn't anything earth shattering.
To me he proved that he's a very nice bottom 6 role player, who can play playoff hockey. Definitely a nice piece for any team but not a world beater by any stretch.Nick Paul's playoff performance may be the most overrated thing ever.
Its like people remember g7 vs Toronto and attach that to the rest of the run. Like he was certainly good for his role, but he wasn't anything earth shattering.
I hate him because he likes the opposite players I doI like Drury because he likes the same players I do.
If Tampa buys out Myers they get a cap credit as well. I wonder if they keep him or not.
Yes, GMs will always be more interested in improving their team than hurting another one.This is why I don’t stress about our cap situation. Some GM is always willing to help out.
until they pull a random player out of their ass that plays at a high levelThe good news is that this move makes Tampa significantly worse
Not a question of balls but he is smart enough not to trade a 50 goal scorer who most likely will be or should be captain of this team. These trade Kreider posts are even dumber than the ones you all were posting same time last year. If he continues playing at a high level, even scoring 35-40 goals his contract is a bargain. No way he can't keep this up for 3/4 more years. Guy is in great shape and 31 is not old.The Rangers will be able to trade Kreider and to a lesser extent Trouba as long as Drury has the balls to do it at some point
Probably Ekholm.Who's playing on the Right Side for Nashville? Josi, McDonagh or Ekholm?
I remember MacTruck playng on the right with Suter in the olympics? Pretty sure it was the olympics.Probably Ekholm.
Come on do you really want to go through another argument, we went through this with chytil's face-off thing.Well probably because you stated "in the playoffs" indicating you think giving a player a 7 year deal for a reasonable amount of money is a wise decision based on 23 games. He didn't give a lower AAV. Do you seriously believe he was getting 4M+ on a shorter deal? I don't think there has been a single forward in cap era history that has gotten that much with that poor of a history of offense. I thought Tampa is also supposed to get a no-state tax discount? Somehow he got fair value on huge term in a tax advantageous area. Maybe Bryan Bickell which was a horrible deal.
Maybe but we could say that for a handful of players. If CK matched Kuch. I really do not believe it was about individual players. They pinned us down even using their lesser lines and players. They played a heavier game than we did. They made sure to get the last check, slash, elbow or cross check 90% of the time. Its like the late 70's and early 80s when our Rangers would physically wear down teams like LA and STl in the playoffs.I mean, yes, but if Panarin matches Kucherov I think that series ends differently.
Kreider will never score 50 again and his play 5v5 has fallen off a cliff. And it’s about managing the cap, you’ve got the 2nd highest paid player in the league at LW and the 1st overall pick at LW.Not a question of balls but he is smart enough not to trade a 50 goal scorer who most likely will be or should be captain of this team. These trade Kreider posts are even dumber than the ones you all were posting same time last year. If he continues playing at a high level, even scoring 35-40 goals his contract is a bargain. No way he can't keep this up for 3/4 more years. Guy is in great shape and 31 is not old.
Hopefully some of you have the balls to stop posting this BS.
This is what a lot of people aren’t talking about. I know the rangers were tired at the end there but they got completely shut down after game 2. I don’t know if it’s coaching or players.Maybe but we could say that for a handful of players. If CK matched Kruch. I really do not believe it was about individual players. They pinned us down even using their lesser lines and players. They played a heavier game than we did. They made sure to get the last check, slash, elbow or cross check 90% of the time. Its like the late 70's and early 80s when our Rangers would physically wear down teams like LA and STl in the playoffs.