Rangerboy030
Registered User
- Apr 21, 2012
- 2,194
- 2,800
So it has been written, and so it shall be done.
So it has been written, and so it shall be done.
So it has been written, and so it shall be done.
I see two paths to this team winning the Cup over the next couple of years:
1. The kids (Laf-Chytil-Kakko) really take off, to the point where they are as productive, or even more productive, than Zib+Kreider.
2. The kids continue to improve, Zib+Kreider maintain their current level, and Panarin regains his first year form.
A new 2C isn’t part of either of these scenarios. We lost to TBL because Kucherov was better than Panarin. I really think it boils down to that.
I’m not interested in gutting organizational depth and/or destroying the team’s cap structure in search of a center to lift up our $11M winger. Panarin needs to lift up whoever we put next to him.
Play the kids. Find a cheap, speedy, responsible C to play in the middle six. Enjoy the continued improvement on defense as the kids there gain experience. Hope that Shesty keeps it up.
Keep it simple please.
I am fine with making deadline adds. There is no reason at all to significantly shakeup this core right now. Let it grow.They are either trading picks and prospects now or at the deadline . Likely inevitable
Literally from your post: “The Rangers lost the ability to comfortably sign a 4th liner like Tyler Motte for ~$2M the second they signed a premier bottom 6 player in Barclay Goodrow for $3.6”
adverb: comfortably
- 1.
in a physically relaxed way that is free from constraint.
"he lounges comfortably in an armchair"
- in a way that is free from stress or tension.
"a group of old friends getting together and chatting comfortably"- in a way that is free from financial worry.
"she seems comfortably well-off"
I see two paths to this team winning the Cup over the next couple of years:
1. The kids (Laf-Chytil-Kakko) really take off, to the point where they are as productive, or even more productive, than Zib+Kreider.
2. The kids continue to improve, Zib+Kreider maintain their current level, and Panarin regains his first year form.
A new 2C isn’t part of either of these scenarios. We lost to TBL because Kucherov was better than Panarin. I really think it boils down to that.
I’m not interested in gutting organizational depth and/or destroying the team’s cap structure in search of a center to lift up our $11M winger. Panarin needs to lift up whoever we put next to him.
Play the kids. Find a cheap, speedy, responsible C to play in the middle six. Enjoy the continued improvement on defense as the kids there gain experience. Hope that Shesty keeps it up.
Keep it simple please.
Alright, what do we think of the status quo?
![]()
73 Closer to Draft Speculation - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Create your own team. Trade, sign, recall, reassign, and buyout players as though you were your favourite teams general manager.www.capfriendly.com
Was much more than 1 player imo. TB kept us pinned in our zone on many lines.I see two paths to this team winning the Cup over the next couple of years:
1. The kids (Laf-Chytil-Kakko) really take off, to the point where they are as productive, or even more productive, than Zib+Kreider.
2. The kids continue to improve, Zib+Kreider maintain their current level, and Panarin regains his first year form.
A new 2C isn’t part of either of these scenarios. We lost to TBL because Kucherov was better than Panarin. I really think it boils down to that.
I’m not interested in gutting organizational depth and/or destroying the team’s cap structure in search of a center to lift up our $11M winger. Panarin needs to lift up whoever we put next to him.
Play the kids. Find a cheap, speedy, responsible C to play in the middle six. Enjoy the continued improvement on defense as the kids there gain experience. Hope that Shesty keeps it up.
Keep it simple please.
There’s another path and it’s called “The Kravtsov Effect”I see two paths to this team winning the Cup over the next couple of years:
1. The kids (Laf-Chytil-Kakko) really take off, to the point where they are as productive, or even more productive, than Zib+Kreider.
2. The kids continue to improve, Zib+Kreider maintain their current level, and Panarin regains his first year form.
A new 2C isn’t part of either of these scenarios. We lost to TBL because Kucherov was better than Panarin. I really think it boils down to that.
I’m not interested in gutting organizational depth and/or destroying the team’s cap structure in search of a center to lift up our $11M winger. Panarin needs to lift up whoever we put next to him.
Play the kids. Find a cheap, speedy, responsible C to play in the middle six. Enjoy the continued improvement on defense as the kids there gain experience. Hope that Shesty keeps it up.
Keep it simple please.
LTIR, 1-year $5M, announce the surgery day one, add Miller for Chytil+Lundkvist+1st.
Kreider-Zibanejad-Lafreniere
Panarin-Miller-Kakko
Blais-Strome-Kravtsov
Motte-Goodrow-Rydahl/Cuylle
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Trouba
Jones-Schneider
Hajek/7D
Shesterkin
backup
Goodrow 3C until Strome comes back, Rydahl as 4C, Hunt, and Reaves can rotate at 4RW if Cuylle isn't ready.
That is...the problem, I agree. Ugh.Except the issue here...Is that no matter what... IF strome is on this team.. He is stapled to panarin.
Hey, I am with you on wanting Miller.No thanks. The team needs some outside improvements, especially at center. Going with Chytil/Goodrow behind Mika is what the Rangers competition wants
You joke but he’s a major X-factor in my eyes. Especially if Kakko continues to “impress” but not produce.There’s another path and it’s called “The Kravtsov Effect”
Fast is a much better player than Motte, who has the ability to play up in the lineup. Motte is ideally a 4th line forward who might be able to fill in on the 3rd line. There's no similarities between the two circumstances.Years of bitching about letting Fast go
Now it is don't sign Motte for 2 mil or it will alter the entire course of the franchise
I mean, yes, but if Panarin matches Kucherov I think that series ends differently.Was much more than 1 player imo. TB kept us pinned in our zone on many lines.
Now your just being silly. We are talking about a 4th liner making under 2 mil.Yes, and I hope the Rangers sign Filip Forsberg and Johnny Gaudreau. I’ll let the finance guys figure it out.
The Rangers MO is overpaying 4th liners the last 12 months so if anything this is expected lolThe primary difference between Fast and Motte was that Fast was capable of providing enough offense to play in the top 9 when needed, Motte is not. He’s a pure fourth liner.
So it has been written, and so it shall be done.
I can discuss adding a 4th liner to the mix without writing an essay about what the cap may look like in 2 years. Too many variables and complexities to worry about every single dollar and the cap may actually go up after 23-24 season. I want my team to ice the best team they can within reason even if it means spending a few extra dollars. I trust the professionals to understand the nuances and details of the cap. I mean we aren't talking about signing McDavid here.Ok but then don’t weigh in on moves that should or shouldn’t be made and then retreat to “that’s not my job to worry about.” The discussion, if you want to participate in it, has to take the cap into account.