- Aug 5, 2010
- 13,881
- 9,514
FYI - Buchnevich will fetch more in a trade than Kreider. I know it’s risky, but between the two “assets,” Buch is now more redundant to what they have. They’ve drafted talented wingers at No. 9 and No. 2 who predominantly played RW, and each can supplant Buch within two seasons.
A package involving the RFA; Buch, possibly Deangelo, including maybe a draft pick (future first) or two in play, that gets you in the ballpark of a younger, cost-controlled center. Kreider at this point will fetch a Hayes-like return (late 1st + prospect). Not sure it’s worth clearing only $4.6 million in cap space just for the sake of it. Feels like a move that is spinning the tires and makes the playoffs more of an uncertainty.
It’s not a necessity, but the idea of adding a center to Chytil, Lias and Howden is enticing and intriguing. Allows one to shift to wing (Chytil looked great there at times).
My thought process is it’s a hard sell to trade Kreider to get under the cap, get a Hayes-like return, and then start opening night with Staal and Smith around. If you need to retain a bit of salary to move Namestnikov, that’s okay. If you attach an asset or two to clear most/all of Smith’s salary, that’s okay. If you flip Shattenkirk (salary retained) or Deangelo (for presumably a first-round pick or 2nd + prospect), that’s okay. Trading Kreider and expecting a playoff bubble team as currently constructed is a tough sell.
Same as Hayes, moving Kreider is not about his $4.6 for next season, it’s about $7m for 6-8 seasons thereafter. It still would be approximately viewed as part of the rebuild and continuing to build the talent pool.
Moving Buchnevich, ADA and a first is somewhat different. Losing pieces that could contribute in excess of their expected cap hit. Redundant? Talent is NEVER redundant and Buch has a very good chance to be more productive than Kreider. Even if he plays behind K&K, think about J Staal behind Crosby and Malkin or Kessel also on a third line. This depth brought Pens multiple SC.