will1066
If you score four, you better f'n win the game
- Oct 12, 2008
- 52,467
- 75,664
That is really inefficient. You are basically saying you want to do a bernmeister trade. The time to move Buchnevich was at the draft. Doesn't make sense to do it now. As I said, I think the move is just to get back picks, and then you can use draft assets to shop for a 2C later. There isnt really a player swap that makes senseI think we could call it a log-jam or creating depth from which to make other deals from. For example, perhaps Kaut continue to develop and Gorton decides to trade Buchnevich. Or they decide they want to use Chytil as a piece to bring in another type of player at another position.
Neither team does this. No way they make a deal with each other. No way Philly deals Patrick for a 28 year old Kreider, signed or notKreider and a conditional pick to Philly for Patrick?
That is really inefficient. You are basically saying you want to do a bernmeister trade. The time to move Buchnevich was at the draft. Doesn't make sense to do it now. As I said, I think the move is just to get back picks, and then you can use draft assets to shop for a 2C later. There isnt really a player swap that makes sense
You say the Rangers "should be targeting the best player they can" but you are advocating moving Buchnevich to open up a spot for an inferior player . This kind of proves my point . The Rangers don't need to move Buchnevich to have said options.The trade of a player like Buchnevich wouldn't need to be right now. Nor would it need to be specifically Buchnevich. It opens up possibilities to move players from a position of depth. The rangers should be targeting the best player they can.
Forgot what Pionk looks like. Please continueHuh?
Forgot what Pionk looks like. Please continue
Neither team does this. No way they make a deal with each other. No way Philly deals Patrick for a 28 year old Kreider, signed or not
I am not a Larry fan at all but I agree with him wholeheartedly on this one. Defense is improved with Trouba (and I think, or hope rather, playing with him will benefit Brady), but bad vets and rookies still on our backend will be an issue, as well as Henriks decline (again, hopefully Trouba's addition will help there but still). Young players need to find their way, and if all goes well we will have at least 2 rookies in our top 6. We have a ways to go. Much improved for sure, but my prediction is wild card contender for next season.so much this...
https://nypost.com/2019/07/02/dont-forget-the-rangers-journey-is-only-beginning/
I think Larry nails it here
The Rangers really like Nolan Patrick, if I recall correctly, but I can't see them making a deal with us (trading a former #2 overall to a division rival is bad optics) and I don't think a 1 year rental Kreider is enough to get it done. They'd want another player and/or high pick to make it happen.Kreider and a conditional pick to Philly for Patrick?
Yeah, but also (i) more turnover/new personnel and (ii) much higher pressure.
So sure, our peaks will be a lot higher. But to do well over 82 games you must run a pretty cynical organization and make sure that you are hard to beat and not give anyway away for free. Our division will definitely be pretty tough.
Like for example, we will be reliant on our top line to score a lot of pts, especially if both Ziba and Panarin is on it. But what if Panarin and Ziba just tries to overcomplicate things and tries to find each other too much early on? I am not sure if they are great fits, these things aren’t easy, it’s like BR and Gabby, they never worked together at all. That can hurt us a lot the first 2-3 weeks of a season. And on the other side we will face very determined teams that won’t give an inch away. Teams that doesn’t have 7-8 new players or whatever. And doesn’t have a bunch of players younger than 21. And so forth.
Knowing the N.Y. media and fans, there will also be a ton of pressure on the team now that the rebuild is over. 2 weeks, bad results, someone will be hanged.
The Rangers really like Nolan Patrick, if I recall correctly, but I can't see them making a deal with us (trading a former #2 overall to a division rival is bad optics) and I don't think a 1 year rental Kreider is enough to get it done. They'd want another player and/or high pick to make it happen.
You say the Rangers "should be targeting the best player they can" but you are advocating moving Buchnevich to open up a spot for an inferior player . This kind of proves my point . The Rangers don't need to move Buchnevich to have said options.
I'd be fine if we moved Kreider to Boston for Studnika+2020 1 and a conditional pick if he re-signs.
Having a Kaut - Chytil duo is worth it Gorton cmon
For a center like Patrick that fills a need.
Kreider + lottery protected 1st
or
Kreider + Lundkvist or Andersson
Could get it done. Painful/Risk for both sides.
Pretty good chance Kreider signs with them given Hayes and proximity to home.
This is brilliant. And could his translator be like his uncle? Some old shady looking guy. Panarin speaks for like 30 seconds, but this guy just say “no” or “yes”.
Look at the teams in this years final. We would have been physically destroyed and crushed. Meet grit/toughness.A lot of youth, and not much grit... just don’t want to see these guys get pushed around especially as the games get tighter late in the year. It’s also probably wise to break up that top line a bit.