Speculation: Roster Building Thread II (2022-23): The Puck is Prepared to be Mounted

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The return of Staalsie?




Brooks was writing about the Devils and he mentioned the Rangers with the Staal.

Hughes is lucky the Devils won the lottery. He would be playing on the third line as a wing on the Rangers. Everyone would be asking what's wrong with Hughes. Why can't the Rangers develop first line forwards? The Devils do have not anyone blocking Hughes. The Rangers have a million forwards playing ahead of their young guys. The Rangers cater to them because of their contracts.

@Uninstaaled would have to change his name to Reinstaaled. :oops: Don’t put that guy through hell. No thanks. Brooks is just bored from no Hockey this past week.
 

"we have not engaged with the players’ association on that specific issue.”
Meaning: "The PA has not offered enough concessions for us to so much as go to the table on it. So f*** the players."
 
  • Like
Reactions: kovazub94
Panarin is too comfortable. He has a full NMC. He thinks no one can touch him.


The Rangers will need to move out money in the future. Do you really believe the Rangers are winning with Panarin, Kreider and Zibamejad as their main three forwards sucking up all of the TOI and playing in every situation?

What happens when Panarin has another listless playoff performance? Drury didn't sign him. Drury should force a confrontation. Leak his name to the media. The Rangers wouldn't mind moving on from Panarin and there are a few teams interested.
Gallant needs to hold his vets accountable. It helps no one to just let Artemi do whatever he wants, play however he wants. Surely, he needs to be confronted, but this should start with the coach.
 
Blais is back up. Cuylle is headed up too. 14 forwards. Likely means someone is the odd man out. Maybe - if Erne passes through waivers - he is dealt at 50% for Blais and a small add - as they can then send him down accruing a bit more space? Would put the Rangers at over $7 M as their available deadline space. Every bit counts

Pretty sure Detroit is saving their 3 retentions for others like Sundkvist , Maanta, Bertuzzi or Suter
 
So whether it's Panarin or Judge or Correa, etc, when people say we'll live with the back end of the deal, they are full of S?
I’m thinking if not for unforeseen circumstances like a COVID induced flat cap we would not be wishing so hard we could move him. He’s still putting up a ton of points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare
Panarin or Kreider will need to be moved after the season. Drury needs to move out money and break up the LW logjam. Panarin will have to want to leave but maybe telling him his ice is being cut and brining in more of a hardass coach will make him want out. Kreider will be easy to trade imo. His contract is good and he can still play, I’d be sad to see him go but it’s a business. He’d have more control over where he goes this summer, before his NMC downgrades to an NTC in 2024. It’s time to start moving toward the new core, especially if we have a short playoff run
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chalfdiggity3
Panarin or Kreider will need to be moved after the season. Drury needs to move out money and break up the LW logjam. Panarin will have to want to leave but maybe telling him his ice is being cut and brining in more of a hardass coach will make him want out. Kreider will be easy to trade imo. His contract is good and he can still play, I’d be sad to see him go but it’s a business. He’d have more control over where he goes this summer, before his NMC downgrades to an NTC in 2024. It’s time to start moving toward the new core, especially if we have a short playoff run
I think it depends on the cap. If the cap rises $2-$3 million instead of $1 that could keep them around for 1 more season. Which, if we keep both our 2023 1sts/Othmann/Cuylle, may be all we need until we get to the summer of 2024. Then you consider moving 1/2. Given how deep this 2023 class is, one of those picks could be ready for the 24-25 season, but if anything you almost definitely can start planning for an infusion of both Othmann and Cuylle with other guys on the outskirts such as Berard, Rempe, Edstrom, BmB, Sykora, etc., to start pushing to fill out your 12 forward spots.

I am so uncertain about someone like Meier. I absolutely like the player. But he could cost you a 2023 1st PLUS you have to move out a Kreider/Panarin in the offseason. Where as a Tarasenko or Kane may not and likely wont cost you a 2023 1st, so you get to keep that pick and youre not moving out Kreider/Panarin to extend them, in fact you may be able to get Kane to extend on short term deals at a low AAV. So in essence you end up with more impactful pieces beyond this season than just one Timo Meier; 2023 1st staying at minimum is a plus, let alone keeping Kane around. I am less on the Kane train than at the start of the year believe me, I prefer Tarasenko, but I am just trying to look at all the chess pieces on the board. Acquiring Kane may not put you over the top this year, but it could allow you to stay on a good path for next year and beyond.
 
The return of Staalsie?




Brooks was writing about the Devils and he mentioned the Rangers with the Staal.

Hughes is lucky the Devils won the lottery. He would be playing on the third line as a wing on the Rangers. Everyone would be asking what's wrong with Hughes. Why can't the Rangers develop first line forwards? The Devils do have not anyone blocking Hughes. The Rangers have a million forwards playing ahead of their young guys. The Rangers cater to them because of their contracts.

Nope

Nope nope nope.

No Staal. He’s still really bad.
 
I think it depends on the cap. If the cap rises $2-$3 million instead of $1 that could keep them around for 1 more season. Which, if we keep both our 2023 1sts/Othmann/Cuylle, may be all we need until we get to the summer of 2024. Then you consider moving 1/2. Given how deep this 2023 class is, one of those picks could be ready for the 24-25 season, but if anything you almost definitely can start planning for an infusion of both Othmann and Cuylle with other guys on the outskirts such as Berard, Rempe, Edstrom, BmB, Sykora, etc., to start pushing to fill out your 12 forward spots.

I am so uncertain about someone like Meier. I absolutely like the player. But he could cost you a 2023 1st PLUS you have to move out a Kreider/Panarin in the offseason. Where as a Tarasenko or Kane may not and likely wont cost you a 2023 1st, so you get to keep that pick and youre not moving out Kreider/Panarin to extend them, in fact you may be able to get Kane to extend on short term deals at a low AAV. So in essence you end up with more impactful pieces beyond this season than just one Timo Meier; 2023 1st staying at minimum is a plus, let alone keeping Kane around. I am less on the Kane train than at the start of the year believe me, I prefer Tarasenko, but I am just trying to look at all the chess pieces on the board. Acquiring Kane may not put you over the top this year, but it could allow you to stay on a good path for next year and beyond.
I mean tarasenko will cost a conditional first.
Kane is injuried and possibly not even a deadline move.

Meier is the cream of the deadline crop, but the only reason SJS even moves him out is if they can't get a working long term deal with him (or he doesn't wanna stick around for the rebuild).

The downside of Meier is almost no team who's a contender can afford him past this season without moving out a chunk of their roster. Would adding Meier to our current roster be a major coup? Yeah sure, but as you point out, we'd be forced to move someone big from our roster in return.
I'm hopeful trouba returns to form, Kreider is still a likely 30g scorer, who needs to get on a hot streak and he's looking at 40g.
The kids are going to start getting paid soon, and we're going to need some cheap talent. The vesey signing was really good because it gave us cost assured 4th line( at worst)help even if the cap goes up.
I think the message bettman is saying publically is different than what he just told GM's because you've got a bunch of guys getting locked up, and I dont think its because the cap is staying flat. I think the cap is going to get a bump and GM's want extra space so theyre using this time to lock up guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhamill
I mean tarasenko will cost a conditional first.
Kane is injuried and possibly not even a deadline move.

Meier is the cream of the deadline crop, but the only reason SJS even moves him out is if they can't get a working long term deal with him (or he doesn't wanna stick around for the rebuild).

The downside of Meier is almost no team who's a contender can afford him past this season without moving out a chunk of their roster. Would adding Meier to our current roster be a major coup? Yeah sure, but as you point out, we'd be forced to move someone big from our roster in return.
I'm hopeful trouba returns to form, Kreider is still a likely 30g scorer, who needs to get on a hot streak and he's looking at 40g.
The kids are going to start getting paid soon, and we're going to need some cheap talent. The vesey signing was really good because it gave us cost assured 4th line( at worst)help even if the cap goes up.
I think the message bettman is saying publically is different than what he just told GM's because you've got a bunch of guys getting locked up, and I dont think its because the cap is staying flat. I think the cap is going to get a bump and GM's want extra space so theyre using this time to lock up guys.
I think the difference with the bolded is it could be a 2024 2nd with the condition it becomes a 2024 1st if they make the SCF / plays a certain amount of games / etc., to protect ourselves.
 
Crossing my fingers for that.
The NHLPA doesn’t have an executive director. Fehr is on his way out. The NHLPA had a big meeting a few days ago. One faction wants the former mayor from Boston. The problem with Marty Walsh is he apparently has a close relationship with the Bruins ownership. Nobody wants Jeremy Jacobs. One faction wants Mike Gillis. Who is Bettman supposed to negotiate with? Gary will something in return. Gary will tell them pay your debts and the cap will go up.
 
Better than Trouba, at least in the game we played against Florida. He’s a better skater than him easily lol
Since when did we switch from the Trouba is injured narrative to the Trouba is just bad narrative?
Trouba last year and in the playoffs was the exact player we needed.
Trouba has never been a bad skater in his career.
Trouba has never been this bad defensively before.
Trouba isnt 30 yet so its likely that he isn't hitting any sort of cliff.
 
Panarin or Kreider will need to be moved after the season. Drury needs to move out money and break up the LW logjam. Panarin will have to want to leave but maybe telling him his ice is being cut and brining in more of a hardass coach will make him want out. Kreider will be easy to trade imo. His contract is good and he can still play, I’d be sad to see him go but it’s a business. He’d have more control over where he goes this summer, before his NMC downgrades to an NTC in 2024. It’s time to start moving toward the new core, especially if we have a short playoff run
We can make things fit next year but we will be limited in our strategic contract approach and improving via the market. I say trade Panarin at deadline if he’s not helping us if the way that he should. I through out an idea involving Florida.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad