Paulie Walnutz
HFNYR JUST AS SOFT AS NYR
- Oct 1, 2008
- 11,139
- 9,443
I wouldn’t discount any Rangers/Sharks talks considering Grier was with us before taking the job out there and he’s close to Drury. Plus don’t forget Quinn is the coach.
Because they barely skimped by 2 teams playing their 3rd string goalies and while it was a good run, it's not like they are some top-of-the-league powerhouse where this is the only year they should be looking at. Trading 1st's is a recipe for a short window.
I hope you're right, and I know you are a cap expert, but aren't they projected to have $5M+ at the deadline? If so I would be surprised if they didn't use most of that either in smaller deals or a bigger move with retention.
Easy.How in the hell do we make that work lol he's getting 8M AAV minimum
Don't mind the devils spending assets on him since that group will be ran over in the playoffs.Only way Meier makes sense cap-wise is if we're getting rid of at least 1 of Kreider or Trouba in the offseason. Which to be clear, I would not mind, but still. Also we'd need to outbid the Devils for him, b/c they're expected to make a run at getting him
But he'd likely take less than $10m with term so his QO is kind of irrelevant (I don't think we're getting Meier)Only way we can afford Meier is if Trouba is moved lol
His QO is 10MM...
The devils are in just as much if not worse of a cap situation this off-season. Look at everyone they have to resign, they are going to lose some guys for sure as it is. I don’t think they can afford him unless a contract goes the other way.Only way Meier makes sense cap-wise is if we're getting rid of at least 1 of Kreider or Trouba in the offseason. Which to be clear, I would not mind, but still. Also we'd need to outbid the Devils for him, b/c they're expected to make a run at getting him
I agree Panarin is highly unlikely to be traded. But I wouldn’t characterize the suggestion as laughable. He's the one guy signed long-term who doesnt fit Drury's idea of a 'playoff guy'. But he has next-level skills to offset that, i think we'd all agree. So while i *highly* doubt any of the long-term contracts get moved, if one does, it's probably Panarin.Panarin isn’t getting traded. Even suggesting it is laughable lol
"We've been told about how exciting the 2005s (their birth year) are for a while now," one NHL general manager told ESPN. "It's why a lot of clubs are looking to hold on to their first-round picks this year. Sounds like you can even get first-round talent in the second round, too, and those picks may be stronger than first-round picks [in 2024]."
"I spoke at the GM meetings in November and I told them, 'This draft class is going to live up to the hype,'" the NHL's VP of central scouting, Dan Marr, told ESPN. "But there's a quicker end point than usual. There are 50-60 really good prospects. After that it does start to level off."
I strongly agree with your assessment of the situation and the perspective you present here needs to be repeated here regularly...these things take time. We need patience. And much more, Drury and co. need patience. And i'm kind of thinking they will show patience. Fine-tuning is reasonable, calculated risks are understandable. I dont expect the team to sell the farm. I certainly hope they hold all their frps.This is just one of those drafts man.. I've kinda just accepted the fact that Drury is probably going to deal one of the firsts though. I don't agree with it but oh well.
Colorado took 5 years since their last playoff miss to win a cup. It was a journey for Tampa. They had a run where they missed the playoffs 5 out of 6 seasons and after that last miss it took them 7 more years to win a championship. Stammer and Hedman are the only 2 that endured the majority of it. Tons of good players came and went there, Lecavalier, St Louis, Callahan, Tyler Johnson, Drouin, Miller, all replaced in some way or another by Kucherov, Palat, Point, Cirelli, Gourde, now they have Hagel filling another hole. They continue to find ways to replace players. Incredibly competitive throughout this time period. About as close as you can get to a modern day dynasty.
I'm not saying that's how long it needs to take but if I'm being objective with where this team is at... our franchise winger is underpeforming, our right side is incredibly weak. Kakko has all the promise in the world, he's turning a corner but he's not fully there yet. Kravtsov has plenty of potential but that's another RW that's not there yet. Laf isn't there yet. Chytil is ready. Our D is pretty f***ing solid but it doesn't help that Trouba began the year hurt. That's a disadvantage and our 6th D is a question mark. People will take that as being down on the team. Its just being objective. We have a good young team with plenty of promise but I dont think those holes on the right can just be fixed with a deadline deal. That doesn't mean we can't make a push and maybe be a contender.. it's just weighing that shit versus looking at the quality of this draft, I'd much rather take my chances on the 2 picks. It'll be interesting to play Boston in a couple days.. that's a team with almost no holes, are we beating them in a 7 game series? Maybe, maybe not.
Central Scouting just released their rankings, Button just released his January rankings. He has players like Ziemmer and Wood in the 20s. RWs that are goal scorers. They happen to fill a need. Regardless of need, Dower Nillson is ripping the Swedish junior league, ranked as a 1st/2nd rounder. Maybe one of the USDP guys slips down there? Lots of high end talent available down there. Even for competitive teams, the more picks the better in a draft like this
Rangers made a deep run last year because of their deadline acquisitions (NONE of whom they retained). Without them, Rangers are lucky to get past the first round. This is not a team built for playoff hockey....hasn't been since Torts was coach (can't count AV because he used what Torts has built).I dont get why this is so difficult for some to understand. The Rangers are a Cup Contender who made a deep run last year with multiple first round picks in an allegedly deep draft. Do the math. No one should be surprised if one of them gets moved.
I heard it was closer to $7M.I hope you're right, and I know you are a cap expert, but aren't they projected to have $5M+ at the deadline? If so I would be surprised if they didn't use most of that either in smaller deals or a bigger move with retention.
I dunno - I just looked @ Capfriendly and it says 6M this year and RFA with arbitration rights this summer. Am I missing something?
It varies based on roster moves. As of right now, it's at 5.3 mil at the deadline. When Gauthier is healthy, one of Brodz/Leschyshyn will be sent down, so our projected number will go up. But of course further injuries and callups will push it the other way.I heard it was closer to $7M.
Thanks.It varies based on roster moves. As of right now, it's at 5.3 mil at the deadline. When Gauthier is healthy, one of Brodz/Leschyshyn will be sent down, so our projected number will go up. But of course further injuries and callups will push it the other way.
Rangers made a deep run last year because of their deadline acquisitions (NONE of whom they retained). Without them, Rangers are lucky to get past the first round. This is not a team built for playoff hockey....hasn't been since Torts was coach (can't count AV because he used what Torts has built).