NYR Viper
Registered User
If Vegas receives a few 1st rounders and wants to flip a couple along with Dumba for Stepan, I'd be game. Say Anaheim + NYI 1st's?
I think that's the hangup. I see all of the reasons Step is beneficial to the Yotes, but how beneficial is he if they deal a guy like Dvorak who is as proven commodity? Strome could use some time in the AHL, but if they deal Dvorak for Stepan, he's almost forced to step in right away. It makes more sense for them to deal the unproven Strome, than the somewhat proven Dvorak. It's the opposite for the Rangers. Hence why I think that's the hangup in the deal. Could very well be Strome and #7 or Dvorak and #23 as the base of each option, with another piece added in.
The Brassard deal had some other considerations though. They wanted a lefty who could create plays, as opposed to a righty who preferred to shoot. They also had Turris already and didn't need to insulate younger players.
Dallas has Anaheim's 1st. Would have to be CLB 1st or whatever Anaheim is sending them pick-wise.If Vegas receives a few 1st rounders and wants to flip a couple along with Dumba for Stepan, I'd be game. Say Anaheim + NYI 1st's?
Can someone give me a scouting report on:
Fischer
Hickey
I know next to nothing about either of them
Dallas has Anaheim's 1st. Would have to be CLB 1st or whatever Anaheim is sending them pick-wise.
Good point
Here's a hypothetical:
If, as rumored, Vegas takes Marchessault from Florida that leaves Florida with too many RD's. Could the Rangers trade Staal to Florida and in return take Demers and Bjugstad? More money and cap coming back but the Rangers can buy out Bjugstad if desired. I would probably give him a year to see if he can round himself back into form. From my understanding the Rangers liked him in his draft year.
So, that would mean the other assets in the deal would have to have more value. And, frankly, if the Rangers have a player in mind, I don't think it matters if that player can step in right away. I think Gorton is looking to make the best deal regardless of how immediate the impact on the NHL roster is.
I've seen Hickey play with BU a bit and he reminds me of Brandon Smith. Not that great offensively, but he's a guy who clears the zone in a "modern way" so to speak. LH shot but not elite. Could be a good 3rd pair option once we find a way to get rid of Staal.
McDonagh
Skjei
Hickey
Fischer is a very good forward prospect, with an all-round good game. He still needs a year or two before he can be a quality player for the Rangers, but his first season in the AHL looked very promising.
Fischer is Stepan 2.0 in many ways, even the non-hockey aspect. 2nd round pick, underrated by many at the time. He could be a good piece if they don't want to trade Dvorak, but in my opinion, Dvorak is the better player long-term.
I'd do the deal with FLA just to get rid of Staal. Demers and Bjugstad are bonuses. I agree, give Bjugstad a year to try and bounce back.Good point
Here's a hypothetical:
If, as rumored, Vegas takes Marchessault from Florida that leaves Florida with too many RD's. Could the Rangers trade Staal to Florida and in return take Demers and Bjugstad? More money and cap coming back but the Rangers can buy out Bjugstad if desired. I would probably give him a year to see if he can round himself back into form. From my understanding the Rangers liked him in his draft year.
Good point
Here's a hypothetical:
If, as rumored, Vegas takes Marchessault from Florida that leaves Florida with too many RD's. Could the Rangers trade Staal to Florida and in return take Demers and Bjugstad? More money and cap coming back but the Rangers can buy out Bjugstad if desired. I would probably give him a year to see if he can round himself back into form. From my understanding the Rangers liked him in his draft year.
Same deal in Arizona though, the Rangers are okay with a left handed center as they have Zib and Arizona is specifically looking for a RH C
I would hope that is the case, but I'm trying to be rational about it as well. I don't think Gorton is as concerned about the immediate impact of players either, but I'd bet he'd prefer guys who are more proven.
If I had to guess what Gorton has on the table right now, I think it's probably Strome and #7, or Dvorak and #23, with a third piece involved in each option. Chayka is probably saying Strome, #23, and that third piece.
Good point
Here's a hypothetical:
If, as rumored, Vegas takes Marchessault from Florida that leaves Florida with too many RD's. Could the Rangers trade Staal to Florida and in return take Demers and Bjugstad? More money and cap coming back but the Rangers can buy out Bjugstad if desired. I would probably give him a year to see if he can round himself back into form. From my understanding the Rangers liked him in his draft year.
The value on here is very, very far off.
Staal has negative value. He is unmovable without retaining money, or adding assets to him. On the other side, Demers is a legitimate d-man, on a friendly deal. Florida isn't going to trade Bjugstad when his value is at an all-time low.
Right, but as of right now, the Yotes have two centers under contract for next season with NHL experience. Dvorak and Bolland. Only one of them is playing next year. If they deal Dvorak, then they're stuck in the same spot. At least if they keep Dvorak, they can play him behind Stepan. That's really the perfect outcome for them.
From my POV, Ryan McDonagh for Honka and the 3rd would be a deal I would do. If we got an opening at LD -- I would definitely not be against taking Erik Br�nnstr�m with the 3rd or preferbly trade down a bit to take him. The kid has elite offensive abilities, would be a really good pick. With Honka and Br�nnstr�m we would get a dimension offensively that we haven't had since Leetch and Zubov. Wouldn't be against keeping Stepan if we could get that type of fire power from the blueline.
Honka is ready to be a very good NHL player from October this year. Br�nnstr�m might also be ready for a bit smaller role right away. Played in the SHL last season. Realistically a year away.
This is Honka in a nutshell, he played like this all the time he got the puck in the WCHs:
I agree with this 100%. I doubt Dvorak is the guy. Domi...
The value on here is very, very far off.
Staal has negative value. He is unmovable without retaining money, or adding assets to him. On the other side, Demers is a legitimate d-man, on a friendly deal. Florida isn't going to trade Bjugstad when his value is at an all-time low.
I'm not 100% sure the Panthers view Demers as others do. Their analytics guys aren't in control anymore. They took a pretty bad step backwards last year after spending big $$ on Yandle and Demers and they have Pysyk and Petrovic who are both RD's. They left him specifically available
Let's say we have Strome+7OA OR Dvorak+23OA on the table. What would you guys choose? Not saying it's happening or anything, or is a fair deal, just building on posts I've seen..