NYR Viper
Registered User
I think we should also consider the fact that there appear to be a few teams looking for centers. Minnesota. Vegas. Montreal. Arizona.
I could see the NYR believing in Strome as a 1C. I also think there is more pressure to get a deal done by 6/30 than some are admitting. I also think AZ is the best combination of assets and desire.
We wouldn't be looking for fair, we'd be looking for something that would make moving Stepan worthwhile. What does a "fair" offer do for the Rangers, it doesn't make us any better.
I think the NYR will value NHL readiness over potential. I think they will go for a better prospect who is closer (DeAngelo/Fischer) or an NHL player (Murphy) over #7.
If they get DeAngelo and Strome both are possibly on the roster in October. #7, not so much. I don't think they will go as all in on futures as we would like.
"Get a deal done by 6/30", why because after that he goes into a 10 year contract with a full NMC at 10.5 AAV? Let's be real, even with his ****ty playoff performance he is still one of our best players. He's locked into a good contract that has a NTC for ONLY 2 years. Hardly hampering in the least sense.
I think the 7th is definitely part of the deal. There were reports that last year's 7th was on the table in a deal between the Rangers and Coyotes, so I expect it's still on the table. Add in the Rangers interviewing Makar and Suzuki, players not likely to be be available at 21, and, in my mind, the 7th pick is a priority.
Because trading Stepan at 27 will return a **** ton more than trading Stepan at 29 or to a team via a waived clause.
There's a reason why players often get traded right before clauses kick in. I'm just speculating on what I think may happen, not what I think should happen.
I feel like there are always reports that they interviewed top picks. I'm not sold that it means anything except building files. We'll see I guess.
This is what I keep coming back to. Why are we moving him for a meh deal? There has to be a strategic rationale, otherwise you keep him.
The #7 in a weak draft plus some mediocre JOrts style thrown-ins? Why on earth would the Rangers do that? Are there compromising pictures of Stepan? Of Gorton?
This is what I keep coming back to. Why are we moving him for a meh deal? There has to be a strategic rationale, otherwise you keep him.
The #7 in a weak draft plus some mediocre JOrts style thrown-ins? Why on earth would the Rangers do that? Are there compromising pictures of Stepan? Of Gorton?
#7, 2018 1st, Crouse, and Hickey for Stepan and Raanta
I'd bite the bullet.
I haven't posted much lately but to be completely unbiased I just don't see Stepan worth a top 10 pick with others pieces coming back. He's never hit 60 points. Yes, his defense is good, and he's a pretty good passer, but what you see is what you get. If we were doing ratings by let's say EA Sports, would Stepan be a 90? Is he a top 10 or top 15 center in this league? A top 10 pick is a potential game changer, either a top 6 forward or a top 4 Dman down the road.
Only way that #7 pick is even in question is if Raanta is involved.
Realistically I see it as something like Murphy/Duclair or Perlini/#23 for Stepan
or Murphy/Duclair or Perlini/#7 and Calgary or Detroit's 3rd rounder for Stepan/Raanta and a 4th.
I'm honestly fine with that return if it means the winger lets the Rangers trade Nash for even more assets. He's not going to suddenly turn into Claude Lemieux next April.
Unrelated, if Lindberg is picked by Vegas, I'd look into signing Boyle for 3 years at $2.25. Guy can still play, shows up in the playoffs, and can also play wing well.
I'm still fine with Stepan/Nash/Raanta/Holden and unfortunately one of Lindberg/Grabner/Fast out, and replacing them at least to start the year with Darcy Kuemper/Bonino/Boyle/Smith/Shattenkirk/winger acquired in AZ trade.
And I'd rather give Bonino and Boyle $6.5 combined than Hanzal a dime. Guy is an IR waiting to happen. Also no to Barrie, he'd be getting the Huber/Malkhov/Poti/Malik treatment from the crowd 5 games in and never recover.
What does corsi say about ARI future?
When you propose some of these trades ask yourselves, "would Gorton let my 1-2 center go for 'tis return"?
The logical conclusion on most proposals is no deal. GMJG will want a big return IF he makes a deal. While I still think the chances of a deal are small, it is not contract driven. It would be return driven.