bert
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2002
- 37,576
- 23,899
You're manipulating the conversation that is trying to prove your point. So much of this entire argument is inaccurate.Am I? They've played C at different times during the year so not sure if that's considered reaching.
Well, Chartier and Luccini played in the bottom six this year and are not considered grinders. Soooo, that kinda blows your theory out of water.
As for Watson's skating, I guess it's a he said she said as we won't agree on this without them having 1v1 race. I still maintain Watson is a better skater in term of first step, quickness, and edges. Maybe Soko touches him in straight ahead skating, but Watson is much better in every other aspect.
I grouped them as I grouped all the callups this year. The point was that he hasn't been called up even once, when there were numerous opportunities to do so. If they were higher on him, you would have seen him play already this year. I'm just trying to read the tea leaves. Perhaps I'm wrong, but it sure seems like even though he's ppg in the AHL, he still isn't seen improved enough to make impact in the bigs.
Watson can't keep up his Edgework is terrible. He is playing because he fights. Sokolov is a better skater.
Lucchini and Chartier are grinders. We're brought up to play that role.
Grieg was brought up to play center on a scoring line. Sokolov is a winger. Brassard was ineffective in that role he doesn't skate well enough. Giroux doesn't skate well enough.
Sokolov will get a chance at some point.