OD99
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2012
- 5,200
- 4,416
Generally more skill is better and with size being similar and Sillinger not being considered soft I think you could have banked on his upside.The pre draft info on Silinger had him as offence first type winger. You can’t just convert Logan Browns into elite third line players.
The Sens were drafting for need - say the next Nick Paul. Do you get that by converting Silinger or Converting Boucher ?
Silinger may end up you better than Boucher, but so will 15+ other players selected after Silinger/Boucher including guys taken in rounds 2-6.
All I’m saying is I don’t think the Sens though Silinger could play the roll that this team needs - which is elite 3rd talent that can core grotty goals and lean on the oppositions top players. They basically need a more physical pinto at 3RW and they gambled Boucher could become that over Silinger.I’m okay with the gamble with the way this roster is constructed and what’s in the system (Jarventie, Soko etc).
Perhaps best shot in the draft and sniped wherever he went. Plus is a C.
Team Canada went away from brining in role players years ago and it proves good players can adapt.
Doesn't matter now but teaching a goal scorer to check is much easier than vice versa.