An observation on Nash from Elliotte Friedman on TSN 690 Montreal:
http://www2.tsn.ca/window/podcastcentre/#id=22
A pretty solid take imo.
It's uncomfortable for me to say it, but this was one of my main points and reservations before the deal was made. That Nash would not be able to handle the expectations put upon him. A quiet guy who had had minimal pressure in a small market moving to a much bigger market with much bigger expectations.
Compare Nash's game last night and Krieder's. Yes, they are different players who will make things happen in different ways... but Kreider makes things happen. He used every tool he has to create his opportunities. I know that people are being sincere when they talk about Nash's effort, but I respectfully disagree.
Rick Nash just does not looked fully engaged much of the time.
The way you know this is that there have been games where he is much more fully engaged. Moving his skates. Driving the net. Working the boards. Moving the puck up the ice or into the zone. Creating his own chances. Not waiting for them to come.
It was a better game for him last night, but the more I look at it...just marginally.
Th excuses I read here are baffling. The reason the Rangers acquired this guy was not for him to be playing some secondary, defensive role in a playoff run. They got him because he was an elite talent with tons of untapped big game potential who would score big goals on the way to a Stanley Cup Championship.
My position has always been that I doubted very much that he was the guy to accomplish that task. He has never displayed the temperament, track record, drive or any other thing that made me think he was a key final piece.
The thing that that frustrates most people is that you can see Nash's talent. It just never manifests itself when it really counts.