RD Seth Jones (2013, 4th overall, Nashville) II

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Umm, not sure which WJC you were watching. Jones looks awesome out there, and made smart plays with the puck. Trouba demonstrated poor shot selection most of the time - too trigger happy, didn't make smart plays with the puck. I would take Jones over Trouba any day.

That said, Jones isn't generational yet. Time will tell if he can play himself into that stratosphere, although that is extremely hard for DMen, given how stat happy everyone is when discussing greatness.

Just saying, Trouba was awarded best defenceman of the tournament and the tournament all-star team consisted of Trouba and McCabe on the back end. Jones was great too and has all the potential in the world, but Trouba was definitely better in Ufa.
 
what are the chances that he has a late growth spurt and grows about 5 more inches coming out to about 6 foot 8 like his dad?
 
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=535445&highlight=erik+johnson

People still thought Johnson would go #1 overall if he was 18 drafted in the 2008 NHL draft. Jones is being hyped just as much as Bouwmeester or EJ was. Theres just as good of chance Jones doesn't live up to the expectations as it was with the other two.

Next time there's a forward who is going to go #1 I'll just shout "DAIGLE! STEFAN!" in a dismissive tone, since someone who plays the same position is exactly like previous #1 picks at that position.
 
Umm, not sure which WJC you were watching. Jones looks awesome out there, and made smart plays with the puck. Trouba demonstrated poor shot selection most of the time - too trigger happy, didn't make smart plays with the puck. I would take Jones over Trouba any day.

That said, Jones isn't generational yet. Time will tell if he can play himself into that stratosphere, although that is extremely hard for DMen, given how stat happy everyone is when discussing greatness.

What? Jones was outplayed by both Trouba and McCabe. McCabe was definitely better defensively, while Trouba scored a lot more goals and more points, and came through for the team at critical times (3-3-6 +8 for McCabe; 4-5-9 +2 for Trouba; 1-6-7 +7 for Jones) and were acknowledged as the more valuable players by being designated to the WJC All-Star team.

Not to say Jones isn't the better prospect, but I watched all but one of USA's games, and he was never the team's best defender, IMO.
 
WJC in general is still not a great general basis for talents. Especially when you play over a full season, plus playoffs against teams that have actually played together for several months. Wasn't Jones also the only D-man that wasn't even drafted yet for USA?
 
Next time there's a forward who is going to go #1 I'll just shout "DAIGLE! STEFAN!" in a dismissive tone, since someone who plays the same position is exactly like previous #1 picks at that position.

How are EJ and Bouw comparables to those two outliers? All i'm saying is that people are making him to be a generational talent, which he isn't based on the games I've watched him in, and the defenseman that were just as highly touted as him didn't live up to their expectations.

Nice to know you love Jones so much that you must act like a child.
 
I would not want Jones to grow anymore, might effect his skating.

And RS said it best, he's close to it and has the potential to develop.
 
Everytime defenseman are chosen top 5, or even #1 overall they seem to disappoint.

Hopefully Jones is different.

Hard to live up to the hype when everyone's expecting another Pronger, Lidstrom, or Neidermayer
 
Hard to live up to the hype when everyone's expecting another Pronger, Lidstrom, or Neidermayer

Definitely, there is a different measure for a DMan - especially when you consider that it took Pronger 7 years to win his first Norris, Lidstrom 11 years and Neidermayer 13. These guys didn't just come out of the box as the best of their generation.
 
I think he can be a generational talent, only time will tell. Erik Johnson was considered as one back then, well, didn't work out.
 
I think he can be a generational talent, only time will tell. Erik Johnson was considered as one back then, well, didn't work out.

He's 24 and has been solid this year regardless of the Avs. That is of course minus the injuries which is the only knock against him.
 
He could settle in anywhere from a solid #2 to the best defenseman in the league to be quite honest, predicting the track records of 17-year-old defensemen has sort of proved to be a little difficult to pinpoint over the years. Has some amazing qualities though. He's not Johnson, he's his own player.
 
Actually, his defence partner (Trouba) outplayed him badly at the WJC. I know Trouba has a year on him, but this shows he's not a generational talent.

Trouba doesn't actually have a year on Jones, they were in the same age grouping for NTDP. They're both born in '94.
 
Definitely, there is a different measure for a DMan - especially when you consider that it took Pronger 7 years to win his first Norris, Lidstrom 11 years and Neidermayer 13. These guys didn't just come out of the box as the best of their generation.

Not to mention Chara who took 12 years.

I wouldn't look to throw EJ in the bin at this point, and it is difficult to measure what type of player Jones will be, when it is unlikely he'll hit his prime for a decade.
 
Jones has something to him that sets himself above the rest. I am not sure quite what it is, but he just has that quality.
 
doesn't generational talent just mean you have to be the best of your generation at the position you play?

doesn't just mean "top 5 player in the history of the sport." that's a bit ridiculous.

If you were actually trying to be logical about it, yes. That's not necessarily the way things work around here obviously.
 
I don't know if this has been posted yet, but even if it has it deserves being posted again given the misunderstanding many have regarding the term generational.

If posters wish to make up their own definition of generational they are welcome to do so, but then they should probably make a new term for what hockeys future consider generational, or define what their term implies.


The ranking system they use is not perfect and to avoid misunderstanding it would probably be good if they rated players like Bourque, Crosby (based on his play when healthy), etc because it is not easy to get a read on some players in the Elite level vs Generational level, mainly the gap between a guy like Lidstrom and Staal.

However, seeing defenders such as Lidstrom, Chara and Pronger on the Elite talent list give huge warning signs to anyone who thinks Jones is a generational talent, based on what he has done thus far.

I guess if your HF you get to re-define what a generation is. It certainly does not even remotely equate, in any other context, to "for the ages".

That said, Jones is what he is. Which is a future cornerstone player for whatever team gets him.
 
This whole "to be considered generational you have to be Gretzky, Orr, Howe!"

I consider a player who is the best in his position of his generation (say roughly +/- 5 year age difference) to be a "generational talent". Jones definitely has a chance to be that. Other "generational defensemen" in my book would be Chara, Pronger, Lidstrom, Bourque..
 
Everytime defenseman are chosen top 5, or even #1 overall they seem to disappoint.

Hopefully Jones is different.

Pietrangelo has been a huge exception, and Doughty to a lesser extent.

Definitely, there is a different measure for a DMan - especially when you consider that it took Pronger 7 years to win his first Norris, Lidstrom 11 years and Neidermayer 13. These guys didn't just come out of the box as the best of their generation.
And on the flip side, you get guys like Tyler Myers who went from Calder to a healthy scratch
 
Definitely, there is a different measure for a DMan - especially when you consider that it took Pronger 7 years to win his first Norris, Lidstrom 11 years and Neidermayer 13. These guys didn't just come out of the box as the best of their generation.

Since defensive play is all but impossible to quantify, realize that a lot of the Norris relies on reputation. It's unlikely that Lidstrom's 7 Norris seasons were his 7 best actual seasons.
 

Ad

Ad