Raccoon Jesus
We were right there
and an ability to learn which isn't always there with every players
And a physical capacity/ceiling that basically no one in the league has.
and an ability to learn which isn't always there with every players
Grundstrom actually works hard away from the puck and in pursuit of the puck. His physicality allows him to win puck battles and to keep the puck possession in the cycle. AA does none of that. It's why a rebuilding team gets rid of him less than a year after a 30-goal season. And why nobody else wanted him as a free agent. I guess the Kings thought that they could fix him and round out his game. Nope.
LA signing him the first time made total sense. We weren't even half the team we are now and you hope you can catch lightning in a bottle and he recaptures his 30 goal form. Why tf we resigned him for this year is the baffling part. We didn't need him, he's grossly overpaid and doesn't seem to fit what we're doing here at all.
Maybe it's me, but I don't think Byfield is/was ready for the force...of the NHL, the force of the passes, the speed of the passes etc, I know he's young, and you gotta think he will grow/figure it out, but man, pucks are bouncing off his stick like no one's business.....and not just when he's pressured, but when he's in the clear.....
It's that f***ing Sherwood composite, get this man a Jetspeed!
They arent ruining him. His play away from the puck is already getting better especially in the defensive zone. He was playing hard on his coverages yesterday and missed none. His plus minus is even now. (a lot of rookies are big time minuses) I havent looked up their record with him in the lineup but it is definitely a winning record.I would have drafted QB 1st overall. But my thinking was he'd need at least one more year in the OHL - probably two. And then maybe even another year in the AHL.
QB has all the raw talent in the world. But he was beating OHLers on nothing but on physical ability. He needed time to hone his IQ, to develop his skill. We saw this at the WJCs in his draft year. Against other guys with size/strength or elite skill, he couldn't elevate his game the same way.
I thought he was so-so last year in the two AHL games I watched. But I understood it, given that the OHL season was a waste due to COVID.
What I don't understand is why the Kings are forcing him in the NHL this season. They could have kept him in the AHL all year, learning to play against men with size and speed and skill, developing confidence in his ability to use skill against pros.
They're treating him like the 2nd overall pick - and not like the raw prospect he is.
And they're ruining him, if they keep this up.
I would have drafted QB 1st overall. But my thinking was he'd need at least one more year in the OHL - probably two. And then maybe even another year in the AHL.
QB has all the raw talent in the world. But he was beating OHLers on nothing but on physical ability. He needed time to hone his IQ, to develop his skill. We saw this at the WJCs in his draft year. Against other guys with size/strength or elite skill, he couldn't elevate his game the same way.
I thought he was so-so last year in the two AHL games I watched. But I understood it, given that the OHL season was a waste due to COVID.
What I don't understand is why the Kings are forcing him in the NHL this season. They could have kept him in the AHL all year, learning to play against men with size and speed and skill, developing confidence in his ability to use skill against pros.
They're treating him like the 2nd overall pick - and not like the raw prospect he is.
And they're ruining him, if they keep this up.
i think it’s pretty counter intuitive to say you’d draft him 1st overall and say he’d need 2-3 years to play in the NHL. Stutzle would be first overall and everything else is a toss up. Stutzle showed more talent than Byfield in all the stuff I’ve seen. I always felt like Stutzle was easily the safer pick, and I feel like that reason has come to fruition. Do I think Byfield can turn it around? Absolutely. Can he live up to second overall? Absolutely. Has he been very underwhelming? Absolutely. Is it the fault of the coach ? Absolutely. Is it his fault too? Absolutely. Only time will tell but I guess my feeling is there’s nothing to really bank on with him other than the fact he looked good in the preseason and that’s that.
I hope he proves all of them and their parakeets wrongHopefully Quinton will prove some of you wrong
I disagree. I think the team is picking the player they think can be the best NHL player/career. Not the best D+1 or D+2 player. Best career.Also, if you are taking a guy at #2 overall and expect him to play 2 more seasons of junior and another season in the AHL you should probably not be taking that guy at #2. Part of picking that high is the expectation of an immediate or atleast semi-immediate ROI.
This couldn't be any farther from the truth.Also, if you are taking a guy at #2 overall and expect him to play 2 more seasons of junior and another season in the AHL you should probably not be taking that guy at #2. Part of picking that high is the expectation of an immediate or atleast semi-immediate ROI. Taking a guy #2 overall and not having him in the NHL until his D+4 is pointless asset management.
This couldn't be any farther from the truth.
Half right so far.With all this wisdom here we all know what's going to happen AA is going to heat up and the talk of resigning him will follow.
You’re acting like a guy who’s not going to debut until his D+4 is going to immediately step in and be a star in this hypothetical scenario? Or that players who debut earlier won’t keep getting better?
How many teams have drafted a player high in the 1st round and returned them to junior for 2 years and then a full season in the AHL.
Do you think there is a reason for that is never the path of development?