AchtzehnBaby
Global Matador
They use Microsoft Project which produces a GANTT chart and/or a critical path analysis in multi-billion dollar that I've been involved with. Nice try.
Real projects do not use ms project.
P6
They use Microsoft Project which produces a GANTT chart and/or a critical path analysis in multi-billion dollar that I've been involved with. Nice try.
Sure, there are multiple different software packages besides MS Project. You are getting hung up on something tangental (what tool is used) and doesn't negate the point or points I was making. Can't see the forest for the trees. In the large projects (see #275) that I worked on, the client usually told us what software tool they wanted used as part of the RFP & Primavera was required in some.Real projects do not use ms project.
P6
Try to keep up with your own argument, champ.As usual you resort to ad hominem attacks and stawman arguments when faced with the slightest pushback.
No one has said Dorion has done nothing good. I liked many moves he's made.
He added and then re-signed Zub, made a smart decision to sell high on Pageau and got excellent value, the Chychrun trade was a good (assuming he re-signs, which I'm hopeful he will given his ties to Ottawa) and picking Forsberg off waivers and re-signing him looks like a great move.
My point has always been that the good is outweighed heavily by the bad, and the aspects of the job where a GM makes the biggest difference and speaks most to their competence (acquisitions via trade/signing) are what he is worst at.
Exactly. Hence, we start judging him now on regular season results. After that, if he's still here, we judge him on postseason results. There's no excuse not to make the playoffs this year, it's time for this roster to put up or shut up.A lot of the talking heads are also saying that this year Ottawa has to make some noise as well. We haven't played a game yet. The potential part I agree with & the team does look poised as well. Let's hope we can put our 2C & 3C into games and resolve the cap issues without too much detrimental long term impact.
Exactly. Hence, we start judging him now on regular season results. After that, if he's still here, we judge him on postseason results. There's no excuse not to make the playoffs this year, it's time for this roster to put up or shut up.
Agree 100%.While he was far from my ideal target in the DeBrincat trade, I actually get why Dorion went after Kubalik. We needed more depth scoring and he got a stop gap option in the short term.
He didn’t know Tarasenko would sign so it makes sense to cover his bases.
What’s more questionable is to then sign Tarasenko to that dollar amount knowing how close they were to the cap.
It’s also bizarre to double dip with two guys who are relatively similar offensively in that they rely on their shot and aren’t play drivers who create their own offense.
Tatar isn’t an ideal fit but having him at three million right now, + Pinto in the lineup, would certainly look better than Tarasenko. He’s also got more of a playmaking flavour which would fit better with Norris or Pinto.
after 8 years of being GM we can only START judging dorion NOW?
I agree with your overall point (planning) but I suggest a pencil, a piece of paper and maybe an eraser would be sufficient to foresee the Pinto situation.Maybe, but that doesn't address the sequencing question.
Do you commit so much money to wingers (i.e., Tarasenko) or bottom of roster players when you have your 2C returning from surgery and your 3C without a contract?
Professional project managers plan & strategize (use GANTT charts, critical path, etc.) the steps that are required to meet a goal and the sequence in which they need to occur. Sequencing is very important and not addressing it correctly is often the cause of failed projects.
While he was far from my ideal target in the DeBrincat trade, I actually get why Dorion went after Kubalik. We needed more depth scoring and he got a stop gap option in the short term.
He didn’t know Tarasenko would sign so it makes sense to cover his bases.
What’s more questionable is to then sign Tarasenko to that dollar amount knowing how close they were to the cap.
It’s also bizarre to double dip with two guys who are relatively similar offensively in that they rely on their shot and aren’t play drivers who create their own offense.
Tatar isn’t an ideal fit but having him at three million right now, + Pinto in the lineup, would certainly look better than Tarasenko. He’s also got more of a playmaking flavour which would fit better with Norris or Pinto. He’s also a natural LW which fits more of a need.
I'd rather have Tarasenko than Kubalik. In hindsight, would have been nice to get another prospect or something instead, but hard to say if Detroit was willing and the unknown of Tarasenko.Agree 100%.
Signing Tarasenko was a miss on Dorion's part. I was not a fan. I was very surprised when he was signed.
I hope I'm proven wrong and Tarasenko lights it up.
True, but I'd rather have Kubalik + Tatar (or other bottom 6 winger) instead of just Tarasenko.I'd rather have Tarasenko than Kubalik. In hindsight, would have been nice to get another prospect or something instead, but hard to say if Detroit was willing and the unknown of Tarasenko.
I don't think I would tbh, I still think Tarasenko is gonna show out this year and prove to be important, but I see the reasoning for that line of thinking.True, but I'd rather have Kubalik + Tatar (or other bottom 6 winger) instead of just Tarasenko.
Agree 100%.
Signing Tarasenko was a miss on Dorion's part. I was not a fan. I was very surprised when he was signed.
I hope I'm proven wrong and Tarasenko lights it up.
I respect Tarasenko and what he has done and he has talent... I just don't think he is a great fit. He is slowing down ... His limited dimensions as a player he is good at .. Poor choice imo, to go over the cap with and not be able to sign your 3C with such a bright future.Tarasenko signing is great in a vacuum. He's not the player he once was but he'll probably provide good 2nd line scoring. Maybe 50-60 points, albeit with some laziness and defensive issues.
The issue of course is that we just didn't have the cap space to fit him in, and after adding Kubalik we really didn't NEED another left-handed sniper.
Which begs the question, why the heck did Dorion sign Tarasenko knowing that Pinto wanted 2-2.5M? Well that answer seems obvious to me, given the 5.5M x 4YR contract he offered to Tarasenko earlier in the off-season.
Sens management and the pro-scouts are awful at identifying talent and still thought Tarasenko was a star and worth getting into cap trouble to rent for a year.
I think we'll find that probably isn't the case, especially since we'll need to deal Kubalik or (god forbid) Joseph to open up enough space to re-sign Pinto.
Yes, I agree. I mentioned that the software was NOT really necessary in a post a bit later (#275). The way things unfolded, you do have to wonder what the plan was, or whether there was one. The software bit was not the actual main point of the post. The main point was the importance of planning and that a good plan includes the sequencing of the steps that must occur. Ultimately I think it created a tangent that posters got focused on unfortunately. It's a lesson learned I suppose.I agree with your overall point (planning) but I suggest a pencil, a piece of paper and maybe an eraser would be sufficient to foresee the Pinto situation.
I confess I am old school.
NHL Videos - Highlights and Analysis from the National Hockey League
Watch highlights and analysis video from the National Hockey League. TSN's NHL Insiders and analysts deliver video content, betting information, and fantasy hockey advice.www.tsn.ca
I think any GMs body of work will be part of any examination that is done as well. A POHO will be inclined to look at the dead cap as an example that has led to the current cap crunch situation. PD has been the GM for a while now, so there's a body of work to look at.Exactly. Hence, we start judging him now on regular season results. After that, if he's still here, we judge him on postseason results. There's no excuse not to make the playoffs this year, it's time for this roster to put up or shut up.
Of course it should be and would be taken in to account for any assessment. 100%.I think any GMs body of work will be part of any examination that is done as well. A POHO will be inclined to look at the dead cap as an example that has led to the current cap crunch situation. PD has been the GM for a while now, so there's a body of work to look at.
It's the Stepan situation all over again. Dorion acquires a player for who he was years ago, and seems completely uninformed about who the player is right now.Tarasenko signing is great in a vacuum. He's not the player he once was but he'll probably provide good 2nd line scoring. Maybe 50-60 points, albeit with some laziness and defensive issues.
The issue of course is that we just didn't have the cap space to fit him in, and after adding Kubalik we really didn't NEED another left-handed sniper.
Which begs the question, why the heck did Dorion sign Tarasenko knowing that Pinto wanted 2-2.5M? Well that answer seems obvious to me, given the 5.5M x 4YR contract he offered to Tarasenko earlier in the off-season.
Sens management and the pro-scouts are awful at identifying talent and still thought Tarasenko was a star and worth getting into cap trouble to rent for a year.
I think we'll find that probably isn't the case, especially since we'll need to deal Kubalik or (god forbid) Joseph to open up enough space to re-sign Pinto.
I am with you and believe your initial point was clear (Dorion seems unable to plan and act with foresight). My response was my attempt to say the Pinto situation should have been obvious and planned for without the need for sophisticated planning.Yes, I agree. I mentioned that the software was NOT really necessary in a post a bit later (#275). The way things unfolded, you do have to wonder what the plan was, or whether there was one. The software bit was not the actual main point of the post. The main point was the importance of planning and that a good plan includes the sequencing of the steps that must occur. Ultimately I think it created a tangent that posters got focused on unfortunately. It's a lesson learned I suppose.
Ok. So will the, approximately, $14M+ of cap space next year with 15 roster players already signed be taken into account as well? Cause that seems like the kind of long term cap management that everyone wants, no?I think any GMs body of work will be part of any examination that is done as well. A POHO will be inclined to look at the dead cap as an example that has led to the current cap crunch situation. PD has been the GM for a while now, so there's a body of work to look at.