Glendale will do what it thinks it's best for it's citizens. They have decided to open up bids for arena management. They can either decide to go with the best bid, and the group with the best bid will want to maximize their revenue, or they can decide to give NHL the arena. In Houston, Les Alexander decided to kick out their AHL team for additional concert revenue. This can make sense, since an AHL team really shouldn't be playing in a major league venue. However, it seems that he isn't even interested in an NHL team, otherwise, he'd be first on Bettman's list. Concerts and other area events are starting to out-compete the NHL in the south. If it really is true that marginal additional concert revenue is preferable to an NHL team, then the NHL simply has to leave Phoenix. Maybe the NHL was afraid of this when they had control of the arena, and decided to book as few events as possible for this very reason. Even though they'd make a short term profit, eventually the CoG would realize this and kick the Coyotes out. The NHL's south expansion strategy seemed to hinge on local TV revenues making up the difference in profitability, something that arena managers don't see. Either that, or they control the arenas themselves, taking the middleman out of the equation.
I really can't see how the NHL can compete in the south, given that there are more entertainment dates and opportunities due to the warmer climate. So why would the CoG allow the NHL to retain control, when the NHL won't allow other events to compete with them? It would be completely counter-intuitive. Sure they'll see 41 dates, but they'll only see 41 dates, which takes out ANY advantage of having a primary tenant in the first place. So logically, if there is no owner, the CoG will sell off to the best bid. Since the NHL can't compete with concerts and other events, especially with no owner, they would be on their way out. Again... logically. Maybe if there are NO bids to run the arena, you give Arena rights to the NHL.
So why hasn't the NHL left already? Why are they dragging their feet. Well I suppose one reason would be that we still don't know the bids that were submitted. If the CoG is comfortable with a particular group, the NHL would not hesitate to leave, and they wouldn't even feel that much backlash, as the arena that Glendale built was still going to be used to its potential, and that they didn't waste taxpayer money on a building just to house the NHL. I'm sure the new mayor and council would rather blame the past administration for its mistakes than the NHL itself, politically. We're waiting for two specific dates. 1. The bids for the arena are made public. 2. A decision on who will manage the arena. Nothing else really matters. It looks like the NHL is going to wait out the CoG until this happens. If they have to, they'll add on an additional 2 weeks break "because of the lockout". So the end of May turns into the end of June. "Because of the relocation to Winnipeg, Quebec will know what to expect, and will be able to avoid some shortfalls that Winnipeg had. Therefore I, Gary Bettman think that Quebec City will be ready for the NHL next season, especially since we're starting the season so late because of the lockout incurred during the 2012-2013 season." Gary Bettman's going to grasp as much straw as he can. For the draft, it doesn't really matter which city is represented, since it appears that the same GM will be used.
Gosbee has 0 chance of owning the team. No way. The owners would be furious. He's just being used as a pawn right now. Every piece of news pertaining to Gosbee is filler. The offer is a complete and utter joke.
Most of this speculation, relies a little too much on logic.
Edit: If the NHL has to, they'll start Quebec on the road for the first month. I think there's no depths that the NHL is not willing to sink to.