I think the drop dead day is the draft.
I sense Quebecor is already to go just waiting for the go ahead.
I sense Quebecor is already to go just waiting for the go ahead.
I think the drop dead day is the draft.
I sense Quebecor is already to go just waiting for the go ahead.
I don't think we can assume that, with the Illuminati-like secrecy that surrounds the NHL we can't really know. It's more than likely they have a mountain of relocation offers, not only from the usual suspects but also from places we haven't even considered.
The reason for not pursuing them I believe has more to do with ego more than anything else. Much like the silver age comic book super-villain, it doesn't occur to Bettman that there are easier ways to accomplish ones goals...
I agree. There's not a hard deadline here. I'd give it till mid-June.
Is that not wayyyy to late?
Is that not wayyyy to late?
I don't think the NHL did put a back up offer for staying in Glendale for another year while still running the arena for two reason.
First it undermine RSE bid by taking the threat of relocation off the table. Glendale could take that offer kick that can down the road another year in the hope that a new better deal for them come up.
Second Glendale is not interested in the NHL running their arena anymore they did such a crappy job that nobody want them to do it again. They know that the city is better off giving the management to a third party who would actually work on booking the place than the NHL who will do the bare minimum to pocket most of the AMF.
I don't think we can assume that, with the Illuminati-like secrecy that surrounds the NHL we can't really know. It's more than likely they have a mountain of relocation offers, not only from the usual suspects but also from places we haven't even considered.
The NY Times looked at the relocation options.
Is that not wayyyy to late?
Very good points madhi. Your quite right. Renaissance would lose leverage, it takes the threat of immediate relocation off the table and thirdly, Weiers & some of the Councillors appear unwilling at this stage to further entrust the NHL with Arena Management at any price despite the guaranteed 41 home dates and importance on having the team remain. They could very well be thinking they let the NHL swing for it, as there can be no love lost due to the leagues appalling track record in maximizing revenues over the past 4yrs along with its obstinacy in failing to facilitate a local sale that doesnt include massive subsidies from the taxpayer, pushing Glendale to the brink of having to declare municipal bankruptcy.
I think Nate make a big mistake by making the assumption that Hockey fans are only male. Especially in Canada that "% of avid fans" is way off the rail because of that assumption. For that matter he should have included Laval Qc with 401,553 pop and right next to Montreal if they had an NHL level arena they could make a nice juicy target for a third Quebec team.Don't get me wrong, I did enjoy the piece, but that was actually one bit of it that I thought was particularly nonsensical. Seems extremely useless to compare the number of hockey fans in American markets without NHL teams but teams in other sports versus the number of hockey fans in Canadian markets without NHL teams and no teams in other major sports, or only one if you include the CFL.
Does anyone think that Seattle would only have 240,000 fans if the NHL set up shop there? Or Houston only having 140,000? Those are both big sports markets with their fair share of professional and collegiate sports alternatives that do more than enough to draw interest from a league that doesn't have a team there and is only really ever on a channel buried in cable that most people pass over.
If they got teams, there would be an upswing in the number of people interested in the NHL just from the fact that they'd actually be on local TV on a regular basis and have media coverage, even if still scant compared to other teams in their market. If Houston's percentages increased to a mere 5%, the lowest of any NHL market given on that list, then they'd have about 307,000 fans and be above six other NHL teams, and I'd be willing to bet that they'd be even bigger than that.
On the other hand, that chart, if accurate, does just about say all you can say about Saskatoon's chances. Their fanbase is l but maxed out when talking about a proportional basis. Everywhere else obviously has room to grow, they have almost no room to grow.
Of course, this could change if the NHL says they would be willing to manage the arena for a nominal fee (or even for free).
I think Nate make a big mistake by making the assumption that Hockey fans are only male.
For whatever it's worth: I don't think the NHL has a valid relo offer for the 13-14 Season.
I think that explain his reticence in relocating the yotes. If the Yotes are relocated the NHL does not have another Quebec City to bail them out if the crap hit the fan somewhere else. It got nothing to do with conspiracy or long term planning but with juggling a bunch of live grenades.The NHL under Gary Bettman always has a Plan B
I think that explain his reticence in relocating the yotes. If the Yotes are relocated the NHL does not have another Quebec City to bail them out if the crap hit the fan somewhere else. It got nothing to do with conspiracy or long term planning but with juggling a bunch of live grenades.
I think that explain his reticence in relocating the yotes.
Yeah, if the Coyotes move to Quebec City, there's one less option for future relocations and/or relocation threats. Winnipeg's off the table too. If the Panthers, for example, need to move in 2015, where could they go?
I think that explain his reticence in relocating the yotes. If the Yotes are relocated the NHL does not have another Quebec City to bail them out if the crap hit the fan somewhere else. It got nothing to do with conspiracy or long term planning but with juggling a bunch of live grenades.
I'm starting to get the feel that the NHL is willing to commit to Phoenix to the point where it would receive no money whatsoever from the CoG, and to the point of paying rent to the new arena manager. Add this to the weakening talent base, we could start seeing losses not thought feasible. How does 50M per year in losses sound? But hey... Quebec's not ready!
Maybe the NHL would be willing to go back to US Airways Center just to stay in Phoenix. I think there would be far less losses than in Glendale while keeping market presence. This only works if Glendale hires an arena manager before the NHL makes a decision. They're walking the razor's edge. Would US Airways Center be willing to accept the Coyotes as a tenant?
I can't believe the NHL entered the pot with 2-7 off-suit against the CoG's pocket pair. Now here comes the flop...
Yeah, if the Coyotes move to Quebec City, there's one less option for future relocations and/or relocation threats. Winnipeg's off the table too. If the Panthers, for example, need to move in 2015, where could they go?
Hell, it they keep that up and there's still no owner in a couple of years, the price of the team could reach, oh let's say, $225 million ($25 million losses per year) or using your $50 million per year reaching a whopping $270 million.
I think that explain his reticence in relocating the yotes. If the Yotes are relocated the NHL does not have another Quebec City to bail them out if the crap hit the fan somewhere else. It got nothing to do with conspiracy or long term planning but with juggling a bunch of live grenades.