pth2
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2018
- 3,495
- 2,772
Of course, there is also what I'd call "indirect retention", by sending back a lesser, cheaper, player.That tough. First off there are only 10 teams that can take even that meager cap hit. Several of them already have a lot tied up in retention including slots. Buffalo and Detroit, in their division and fighting for a playoff spot with the sens are not likely to help out at all. Teams with their eyes on the playoffs likely want to save cap space. And some, like Columbus, if looking past this year will have to really up their spending next year.
The hard truth is I do not see a great candidate for anyone to take on even that meager a retention for 3 years. And if one like Arizona did, no reason to think it would be cheap as they know Ottawa is over a barrel.
For example, Montreal could give Ottawa Kovacevic for Brannstrom, saving Ottawa about 1.2M while maintaining an equivalent lineup (in terms of players at various positions). (I'm not suggesting this is likely, since Montreal has Hutson coming up, and no one needs two 5'10 offensive D).
Not quite the same thing, but I wonder if something like Jake Evans for Joseph and a pick (2nd?) might be possible, saving Ottawa roughly 1.3M. This only makes sense if Montreal thinks Joseph could be reclaimed into a more useful player, though, and if they have a plan B for 4th line C.