Proposal: SJS - CAR

ViD

#CBJNeedHugs
Sponsor
Apr 21, 2007
31,716
22,393
Blue Jackets Area
:canes

G Mackenzie Blackwood (50% retained)

:sharks

CAR 2025 3rd round pick

To be honest, I would be surprised if this or a similar trade doesn’t happen

Canes need a reliable goalie given the injuries and the Sharks need an opening for Askarov
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,373
19,874
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
Sharks can’t retain so if you need it, it’ll require a 5th to a 3rd team or something like that.
I would not be surprised if the 3rd party team actually gets a better asset than the Sharks do (assuming 50% retention). I’m not sure that’s happened before, but I also am not sure a team has been in the same position as the Sharks are with their retention slots.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Grinner

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,404
102,399
Some things to think about when looking at a goalie, is that it needs to be the right fit in Carolina.

Canes play a systems that allows few shots on goal. 2nd fewest in the NHL so goalies will often go stretches without getting shots against them. SJ, on the other hand, allows a LOT of shots on goal, 2nd MOST in the NHL, so their goalie is always seeing some action. Canes also play a system that when it breaks down, can lead to more high danger chances. Canes allow the 11th MOST 5v5 HD shots / game in the NHL at 7.18 HD Shots/60 (SJ is 10th at 7.21, so the same amount at Carolina).

Point being that a goalie won't get a ton of action and needs to be able to stay sharp, because when he does see action, there's a higher % of the action that will likely be high danger chances.

Carolina has the best 5v5 HDSV% at 88.5%. SJ is middle of the pack at 82.3%. Kochetkov has a .908 5v5 HDSV% (Last year, Freddie had .894). Blackwood has .842 5v5 HDSV%.

I haven't watched Blackwood enough in SJ to say if he'd be a good fit one way or another but for the years I've seen him in NJ, my assessment is that he would be a bad fit. Maybe he's changed though, as players do develop and confidence is a big part of a goalies performance.
 

Patty Ice

Mighty Luca
Feb 27, 2002
14,497
4,671
Not California
Anything short of a 2nd round pick, I want the Sharks to re-sign Blackwood and move out Vanecek.

He's a better 1 or 2 year stopgap and eventual backup for Askarov. A perfect teammate for a young goaltender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OversKy

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,404
102,399
Anything short of a 2nd round pick, I want the Sharks to re-sign Blackwood and move out Vanecek.

He's a better 1 or 2 year stopgap and eventual backup for Askarov. A perfect teammate for a young goaltender.
While I've learned to never say never, I'll be surprised to see Blackwood get a 2nd round pick or more.

GMs are often dumb though, so you never know.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,404
102,399
Another stat-looker.
What did I post that is wrong? I watched a lot of Blackwood in NJ. He wasn’t good. He was below average last year as well.

And yes, when it comes to Blackwood in SJ, it’s stat watching. Why would I stay i up to watch the Sharks?
 
Last edited:

Patty Ice

Mighty Luca
Feb 27, 2002
14,497
4,671
Not California
That’s very understandable. IMO, goalies don’t have as much trade value as fans like to think. They are more valuable to the team that has them, so I get what you are saying.

To be sure, I don't necessarily think Blackwood would (should?) return a 2nd but if they are moving a goaltender below that value, I would rather it be Vanecek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boom Boom Apathy

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,404
102,399
Blackwood has been decent his entire time in SJ.
Fair enough. I'll take your word for it as I don't watch SJ.

What do you think changed between NJ and SJ? A change of scenery? Less pressure because expectations are lower in SJ? More consistent playing time?

My concern with goalies that come to Carolina is that if a guy is used to seeing a lot of shots and regular #1 playing time, that likely won't be the case in Carolina. Carolina plays a systems where goalies don't see a lot of shots for stretches, but when it breaks down, it's often a high danger shot.
 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,382
6,856
Some things to think about when looking at a goalie, is that it needs to be the right fit in Carolina.

Canes play a systems that allows few shots on goal. 2nd fewest in the NHL so goalies will often go stretches without getting shots against them. SJ, on the other hand, allows a LOT of shots on goal, 2nd MOST in the NHL, so their goalie is always seeing some action. Canes also play a system that when it breaks down, can lead to more high danger chances. Canes allow the 11th MOST 5v5 HD shots / game in the NHL at 7.18 HD Shots/60 (SJ is 10th at 7.21, so the same amount at Carolina).

Point being that a goalie won't get a ton of action and needs to be able to stay sharp, because when he does see action, there's a higher % of the action that will likely be high danger chances.

Carolina has the best 5v5 HDSV% at 88.5%. SJ is middle of the pack at 82.3%. Kochetkov has a .908 5v5 HDSV% (Last year, Freddie had .894). Blackwood has .842 5v5 HDSV%.

I haven't watched Blackwood enough in SJ to say if he'd be a good fit one way or another but for the years I've seen him in NJ, my assessment is that he would be a bad fit. Maybe he's changed though, as players do develop and confidence is a big part of a goalies performance.
his ability to stay healthy was a major problem with the devils. fully healthy he had good stretches. but the lack of alternatives ruined his health, confidence, performance and relationship with the organization.
blackwood is better than his rep from the devils days. a team lacking the depth to give him rest and cure his injuries, should stay away tough.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad