FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 54,812
- 90,268
Man it just said "Block or Charge" with a skybox view of the guy.What did it say?
My low-key fav part is the blue-42 because ever since Necessary Roughness that's been my go to cadence.
right, i forgot , you are hurts number 1 fan, he who despises hurts.You do realize that I was calling for Hurts to play, I believe, before you were, right?
I did that when Wentz was ACTUALLY playing bad and not in your fantasy world. I have nothing to admit fault to in this situation.
Starting two tight ends isn't a tanking strategy, IMO, so that one is BS. Ekeler had also done jack shit up until last week so not really sure that that that is either BUT it isn't the best optics, IMO.View attachment 590733
@Hollywood Cannon thoughts? This is from Dolphins fan not friend hot pot ditcher. I feel like I should just tell him to f*** off.
Just reply with "trust the process"View attachment 590733
@Hollywood Cannon thoughts? This is from Dolphins fan not friend hot pot ditcher. I feel like I should just tell him to f*** off.
It's only a $30 yearly league fee. We literally have no rules or bylaws written. There's a whole bunch of backstory of why I don't believe anything this guy says anymore and he's a giant hypocrite.Starting two tight ends isn't a tanking strategy, IMO, so that one is BS. Ekeler had also done jack shit up until last week so not really sure that that that is either BUT it isn't the best optics, IMO.
I mean as long as you're putting in a full lineup I don't think that you're in the wrong. There's logic behind the things in at least some capacity.
Then you get into the if you're paying money into a league you can play it however you wish to do so. If you think your team is going to be bad then what's the sense in trying to compete?
While you're here...
I'm going to be making a trade with my Uncle. He asked me what it would take to get Rodgers from me. I said Josh Jacobs (RB on his bench). He countered with my Rodgers and Mostert for his Jacobs and Garoppolo.
I think that he'll accept the Jacobs for Rodgers straight up but is there reason that I should do the larger deal?
QB's available are:
Tannehill
Mariota
Jones
Mills
Smith
Wilson
Fields
Mayfield
Watson
So the pickings are slim but if he accepts the straight up deal he'll likely drop one of his QB's (Cousins or Garoppolo)
I really want to reply with a Sam Hinkie/Embiid gif but I'm holding off my response trying to properly formulate it.Just reply with "trust the process"
It's only a $30 yearly league fee. We literally have no rules or bylaws written. There's a whole bunch of backstory of why I don't believe anything this guy says anymore and he's a giant hypocrite.
I would do Rodgers straight up for Jacobs. I don't see the value in Jimmy G since you have Justin. Unless the worse case scenario happens. But I feel like you can find an adequate bye week replacement. Also Mostert feels like a free lotto ticket that I wouldn't want to give up.
I really want to reply with a Sam Hinkie/Embiid gif but I'm holding off my response trying to properly formulate it.
I always am the first one to pay dues since I'm the one that initiates the conversation about starting up the league again during the off season. But this is a power f***ing move.Fired off the Jacobs for Rodgers counter offer.
Oh, well then, guy is taking a way too aggressive stance. Hit him up with $30 in advance for next year and tell him to keep the change.
That would be the only thing that would ever scare me off with teams "tanking" in my league is if they weren't coming back next year so that should shut that up.I always am the first one to pay dues since I'm the one that initiates the conversation about starting up the league again during the off season. But this is a power f***ing move.