achdumeingute
Registered User
Lions had a nice trade down at least. Don't love what they did with it.Lions
WTF was that RB selection?
ATL....for me.
Lions had a nice trade down at least. Don't love what they did with it.Lions
WTF was that RB selection?
Now if we can trade up in day 2 and come away with Brian branch this will be perfect
Um, don't they need a RB still?
But they just took their quarterback. They’re not doing that again next year. If Stroud wasn’t their guy, they take Anderson 2OV and move on.
You’re not planning to be a 3-win team next year, so you’re not getting on getting someone as good as Anderson.
I think if anything, the Cardinals should’ve made sure they were in fact getting the higher pick.
Who's QB3? My brain is hazy from chocolate milk and Jamaican beef patties.But you can't toss out all context like this. This is the team that by all reports had no idea what they were doing at 2 hours before the draft despite knowing Young was going 1. Lance Zierlein is as plugged into Houston as anyone and he's been saying for a month now that they liked the QBs, but didn't love them and were all over Anderson and Wilson.
QB 1st rounders have extra value. There's a saying that "Next year's QB class is always better," but in this case, you've got at least 3 guys who probably would have gone before every QB taken this year last night. And right at the top is the guy in the conversation with Luck and Lawrence for the most valuable asset to enter the NFL this century. Some teams will disagree, of course. Maybe the Texans were even one of them. But on consensus, that's going to be the case. Then you've got Harrison, Fashanu, and Bowers who all would have been the best player in this year's draft. That's not even counting any of the supremely talented guys who could break out and make that class even better. LSU has 3 players alone that wouldn't surprise me being above Anderson on a consensus board next year.
"We're not planning on being a 3 win team next year," has got to be the most prevalent thought process among the worst trades in modern sports history. We're confident everyone else is wrong. Probably not! To be clear, I think you're absolutely correct about their thought process. It's just a terrible one. This is the same exact discussion I've had with deady for the last ~5 years about the Flyers.
Who's QB3? My brain is hazy from chocolate milk and Jamaican beef patties.
Wouldn’t shock me if they went TE with one of their next 2 picks. None of their backups are anything special and they like running the 12 formation. With the other day 2 pick I expect it to be OL.Gainwell is the guy. This RB stuff mystifies me
Secondary a need as always. Wouldn't hate a WR. Definitely want them to go after some uber athletic freak OT for Stoutland
Ohhhhhh I have him going back to school cause he's gonna not do well and Arch is taking over. I was like Penix? No shot it's Bo Nix.Ewers
They rushed the 2OV pick in. They knew exactly what they were doing, just no one could figure out which player they wanted. Turned out it was both.But you can't toss out all context like this. This is the team that by all reports had no idea what they were doing at 2 hours before the draft despite knowing Young was going 1. Lance Zierlein is as plugged into Houston as anyone and he's been saying for a month now that they liked the QBs, but didn't love them and were all over Anderson and Wilson.
QB 1st rounders have extra value. There's a saying that "Next year's QB class is always better," but in this case, you've got at least 3 guys who probably would have gone before every QB taken this year last night. And right at the top is the guy in the conversation with Luck and Lawrence for the most valuable asset to enter the NFL this century. Some teams will disagree, of course. Maybe the Texans were even one of them. But on consensus, that's going to be the case. Then you've got Harrison, Fashanu, and Bowers who all would have been the best player in this year's draft. That's not even counting any of the supremely talented guys who could break out and make that class even better. LSU has 3 players alone that wouldn't surprise me being above Anderson on a consensus board next year.
"We're not planning on being a 3 win team next year," has got to be the most prevalent thought process among the worst trades in modern sports history. We're confident everyone else is wrong. Probably not!
Question about Smith.
He's projected to be an edge rusher, but . . .
How good is his COD, hips and instincts?
Because at 6'2 238, with 4.4 speed and a ridiculous 10 yard split (1.47), if he can read and react and cover in space, he has the athleticism to be an elite WLB.
Next year’s draft class is a whole year away. This time last year, this QB class was supposed to be the generational one. Way too many things change during the draft process much less the actual season. Matt Barkley and Spencer Rattler were once a generational QBs, too. Players might be better, they might be worse. 6 months ago the suggestion of Joey Porter, Jr falling out of round 1 would have most people laughing.
Barkley and Rattler were both absolutely, at worst the #1 QB (but still top 5) if not #1 OV going into the season in which they were Heisman favorites. Barkley actually stayed in school in a year he could’ve been 1 OV. Of course, there’s examples on the other side - nobody had Joe Burrow as that type of guy until he beat Alabama, and then solidified it by shitwrecking teams led by Hurts and Lawrence in the playoff. Every draft process and evaluation is different. I’m not saying there’s no risk here for Houston, but having the chance to take guys who are 1 and 2 on your board at the highest-leverage positions is a Bedard-like situation, it simply doesn’t happen.Matt Barkley and Spencer Rattler were never generational QBs in the NFL draft cycle. You're confusing being projected near the top of the draft with what I'm saying here. Barkley for example was a super hyped QB1 recruit out of Mater Dei who started as a Freshman and played well. There's the infamous quote from Kiper about how he could be a 1OA NFL pick before he had ever played a college game. Then he completely fell on his face his Sophomore year before having the excellent Junior season. But he was still ranked clearly behind Luck, and would have fallen behind RGIII no matter what Barkley did. He didn't have the physical tools to hold off any of those guys if they hit.
Caleb Williams has been the best QB in the country since he started playing. Every QB gets picked apart in their draft year. That is an undeniable truth of the draft process. That's going to happen to Williams to some degree too. It happened to Luck. It happened to Lawrence. But those guys were still wire to wire, no doubt about it 1OAs over multiple years. Those are the only two semi-recent comps we have for what Williams has done.
Remember the U18s when you could watch Bedard and Wright play in the same environment? And one was really good, but the other was an alien? Houston decided to risk trading the pick that becomes the alien.
Barkley and Rattler were both absolutely, at worst the #1 QB (but still top 5) if not #1 OV going into the season in which they were Heisman favorites. Barkley actually stayed in school in a year he could’ve been 1 OV.
Ok, I mixed there years. He was getting that type of buzz though a year out, he was the next great USC QB. Zero people on earth had him as a 4th round pick one year before he was drafted. And then when played himself out of it, it was supposed to be Geno Smith, who was left in the green room and fired his agent I believe. And then the Bills took EJ Manuel who was supposed to be like a 3rd round pick, but ‘they had to take a quarterback.’Respectfully, Matt Barkley was never going 1OA above Andrew Luck. Never. That is the year in which he went back to school.
Matt Barkley himself told us one of the reasons he went back was that he couldn't be 1OA. Even he knew they weren't on the same level.
Ok, I mixed there years. He was getting that type of buzz though a year out, he was the next great USC QB. Zero people on earth had him as a 4th round pick one year before he was drafted. And then when played himself out of it, it was supposed to be Geno Smith, who was left in the green room and fired his agent I believe. And then the Bills took EJ Manuel who was supposed to be like a 3rd round pick, but ‘they had to take a quarterback.’
He would be that level if he does what is expected. Although I would say he’s the best QB next year, I’m not sure there’s his 1OV by acclimation on Williams quite yet because a lot of people like Drake Maye, but I do know people consider the QB class overall to be better.All completely true. But the illustrative point here is that Barkley's arc is a great example of the difference between generational and very good.
No one could displace Luck. No one could displace Lawrence, even after getting clearly outplayed by Fields in 2020 (their D-1). That's the level of college prospect Williams is considered to be.