BringBackHakstol
Registered User
Anyone that thinks for themselves could see that Hodgson was trash. Literally only one person here ever mentioned him as a "piece"
No, it wasn't "Mr. know it all." He had a good season with the Phantoms the year before,
46g 16-10 26 at ES, Sh% was elevated at 21%, but 8-10 18 shooting 10% isn't bad
Foerster this year
56g 11-11 22 at ES shooting 13.3%
Now did they have to guarantee the second season, probably not.
His upside was bottom six, maybe that physical fourth liner that can actually score goals.
Why he fell so far this season? Maybe he was an illusion, more likely there's an injury that hasn't been rep
Don't worry we are paying Adam Brooks 1.1 mil guar for 2 seasons as well .We missed celebrating Hayden Hodgson's 27th birthday on Thursday.
Between this year and next, the lucky guy is getting paid $1,000,000 by the Flyers to play for the Phantoms, where he has 8 points in 40 games this season.
Hayden Hodgson signed a 2 year, $1,600,000 contract with the Philadelphia Flyers on Aug. 29, 2022.
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]SEASON[/TD]
[TD]CLAUSE[/TD]
[TD]CAP HIT[/TD]
[TD]AAV[/TD]
[TD]P. BONUSES[/TD]
[TD]S. BONUSES[/TD]
[TD]BASE SALARY[/TD]
[TD]TOTAL SALARY[/TD]
[TD]MINORS SAL[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2022-23[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$0[/TD]
[TD]$50,000[/TD]
[TD]$750,000[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$175,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2023-24[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$0[/TD]
[TD]$0[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[TD]$800,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]TOTAL[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]$1,600,000[/TD]
[TD]$1,600,000[/TD]
[TD]$0[/TD]
[TD]$50,000[/TD]
[TD]$1,550,000[/TD]
[TD]$1,600,000[/TD]
[TD]$975,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
MINIMUM GUARANTEED SALARY: 2022-23: $200,000
He did not fall. This has always been him. He had one season with an elevated sh%, and you are falling for it. He’s not a good player.No, it wasn't "Mr. know it all." He had a good season with the Phantoms the year before,
46g 16-10 26 at ES, Sh% was elevated at 21%, but 8-10 18 shooting 10% isn't bad
Foerster this year
56g 11-11 22 at ES shooting 13.3%
Now did they have to guarantee the second season, probably not.
His upside was bottom six, maybe that physical fourth liner that can actually score goals.
Why he fell so far this season? Maybe he was an illusion, more likely there's an injury that hasn't been reported.
Chuckles is not very good at his job, is he?Don't worry we are paying Adam Brooks 1.1 mil guar for 2 seasons as well .
He had one season with an elevated sh%, and you are falling for it.
Anything less than $1.25M doesn't matter, b/c you can stash the contract in the AHL.
It's only money in that case. Comcast has lots of money.
It's actually a contract slot, which is more important. Now admittedly, 1 slot should not be a problem on a team with a decent GM, but that is not us.Anything less than $1.25M doesn't matter, b/c you can stash the contract in the AHL.
It's only money in that case. Comcast has lots of money.
You have to use some contract slots to add top AHL veterans.It's actually a contract slot, which is more important. Now admittedly, 1 slot should not be a problem on a team with a decent GM, but that is not us.
I think when they see someone like Hodgson they immediately think Mike Knuble, who blossomed after about 6 years in the NHL. However, not everyone is Mike Knuble......
Forgot to post this. My bad if someone did already.
There was just no need to give him more than a one year deal.Anyone that thinks for themselves could see that Hodgson was trash. Literally only one person here ever mentioned him as a "piece"
Forgot to post this. My bad if someone did already.
One is an individual stat one is a team stat. It's not a 1:1 relationship.I'm confused by how his rel xGF and rel xGA can be that poor based on his other metrics.
Something doesn't seem right.
He's great at transitions and getting shots, but yet if he weren't the luckiest offensive player in the world his mediocre team would be getting abused more than normal while he's on the ice?
Hodgson is Exhibit A for why Fletcher's plan to get better through drafting (without tanking) and finding reclamation projects is doomed to fail.Hidden gem late bloomer
I get that. But you think the metrics jive? I don’t. Something is wrong somewhere.One is an individual stat one is a team stat. It's not a 1:1 relationship.
They don't support your agenda, so they don't jiveI get that. But you think the metrics jive? I don’t. Something is wrong somewhere.
Not necessarily, these metrics are descriptive rather than predictive - it’s not that they have to jive, but they’re describing what’s already happened. Describing what’s happened to fit those puzzle pieces together, considering outliers, is done via context. I haven’t watched a Cutter Gauthier game, so I don’t have the context behind how his game is played to back up the statistics.I get that. But you think the metrics jive? I don’t. Something is wrong somewhere.
Oh, not just him. Even worse. The team doesn't understand the concept of shooting %. Or context at all.
Forgot to post this. My bad if someone did already.
I'm still interested in why his production has shifted from goal scoring to assists the last ten games.
Until we get some scouting reports, or see him in a couple weeks, we won't know.
I mean he just turned 19, he moved from LW to Center, maybe we should expect some growing pains?
I'm still interested in why his production has shifted from goal scoring to assists the last ten games.