Rumor: Peter Chiarelli is not done?

PensFreak

Registered User
Jun 5, 2007
2,331
1
I hope Chia's not done, and that he has a trade in the works for the Penguins.

Klefbom for Kunitz? Losing Hall has really left a hole on that wing... :)
 

thadd

Oil4Life
Jun 9, 2007
26,864
2,923
Canada
Hopkins for Barrie is probably a target for him and if it works out he goes to free agency for a 3rd line center he can sign for 3~4 years.
 

Srsly

Registered User
Feb 8, 2011
2,511
978
Upland
If Larsson is a true #2 Dman in the vein of Josi, Shattenkirk, Bowmeester, Seabrook, then the trade was worth it. But if the Kid can't put up points, he's not a #2, he's a #3.

That's an interesting classification. I would argue that a shutdown role can be just as integral as a puck moving defender and that New Jerseys offense probably stiffled his performance to begin with.

For the record, I personally believe that Hall was a massive overpayment and was baffled there wasn't a plus headed Edmonton's way, I just feel that defensemen shouldn't be judged based upon points.
 

fsanford

Registered User
Jul 4, 2009
7,808
3,195
Strongly agree with this. If there was a better deal to be had, PC would have made it. Defenseman's values are just at a premium compared to wingers, and EDM had to make a deal, which reduces their leverage.

Still like the makeup of the Oilers more today than yesterday.

There are what maybe 5-6 elite #1 defensemen in the NHL that would get you an equal value for Hall. The teams with those guys are not going give them up.

Much easier to develop forwards than D men. Edmonton just is paying a tax on picking all those forwards for years when they had the top picks and avoiding D.

If you look at it Larsson is probably the type of guy they should have taken in one of those years when they took the likes of Yakupov.

They are just doing a "market" correction, when that happens, you lose on the short term, but eventually you get back what you have invested.
 

McDoused

Registered User
Feb 5, 2007
17,264
15,968
Katy <3
If Larsson is a true #2 Dman in the vein of Josi, Shattenkirk, Bowmeester, Seabrook, then the trade was worth it. But if the Kid can't put up points, he's not a #2, he's a #3.

So Greene, Valasic and McDonaugh are all number three defenceman as well? Please.
 

tucker3434

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 7, 2007
20,300
11,358
Atlanta, GA
Hopkins for Barrie is probably a target for him and if it works out he goes to free agency for a 3rd line center he can sign for 3~4 years.

I like RNH, but I don't see that move making much sense for us, especially after drafting Jost. Before the draft, it could have made sense if we also traded Duchene for defense at the same time. But now I don't see us wanting a long term $6m barrier for Jost at the 2C spot. At least with Duchene, we could just move him to the wing.
 

BJD

Registered User
May 26, 2011
376
10
Producing 20+ more points per year is significant. Offense from the back end is very important.

If you guys are happy with Larsson, all power to you, I just think Shattenkirk would have been a better option. It does offer extra cap space that having Shatty wouldn't allow.

Honestly, I wished a Shatty deal had happened because I think Hall would have been lights out on the Blues. Tarasenko, Hall, Pietrangelo on the PP...

Larsson and shattenkirk has the same number of ES points and the devils scored 40 less ES goals then the blues this past season. Shattenkirk's point differential come soley from the PP in which larsson didn't play at all last year
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
I hope Chia's not done, and that he has a trade in the works for the Penguins.

Klefbom for Kunitz? Losing Hall has really left a hole on that wing... :)

Ye they are still missing a top pair RH defensemen. Girardi is their guy :laugh:
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
16,132
12,909
Montreal
Charelli has traded Seguin, Hall, and Kessel, and did not receive the proper compensation from any of those trades.

I've seen this brought up several times this thread.

Do you realise the Kessel trade was considered Brian Burke's biggest mistake ever and one of the worst fleecings of the past decade??

Kessel was traded for Tyler Seguin Dougie Hamilton and Jared Knight.


So.. if you're trying to tarnish Chia for bad trades, this example works against you.
 

nickschultzfan

Registered User
Jan 7, 2009
11,558
909
Chia is looking at where the Oilers are going to be 3-5 years from now, not next season.

And looking 3-5 years down the road, I think the Hall-Larsson deal makes a lot of sense for the Oilers. At that point in time, Hall will had peaked and have even less value. Larsson will have developed and would likely be unavailable. You'd then be looking at a Hall trade for a #4 Dman with no ability to grow beyond that.
 

MoonDragn

Registered User
Mar 28, 2007
9,528
45
Maryland
Larsson and shattenkirk has the same number of ES points and the devils scored 40 less ES goals then the blues this past season. Shattenkirk's point differential come soley from the PP in which larsson didn't play at all last year

Exactly! Larsson also CAN play on the PP but was not put there because he was needed on the PK and going up against other team's top guys. On a team with more balanced D he might produce a lot more pts.
 

CornKicker

Holland is wrong..except all of the good things
Feb 18, 2005
12,154
3,622
Chia was hot fire yesterday so im expecting a mcdavid for cody ceci trade sometime today
 

fsanford

Registered User
Jul 4, 2009
7,808
3,195
From TSN this A.M.

"Lucic is believed to have turned down a six-year, $36 million offer from Los Angeles, allowing him to hit the market. He's reportedly being courted by 10 or more teams with the thought that his new deal will exceed $40 million - perhaps at $42 million - over seven years."

If he signs Lucic 7 years 42 Million, that would be a questionable deal.
 

The List Of Jericho

Judas effect
Mar 1, 2002
18,024
3,500
Toronto
Pretty sure everyone knows that the Oilers are a better, more balanced team as a result of the trade. It's just hard to believe that Larsson was the absolute best return that they could have gotten for one of the best LWers in the league who's 25 years old.

Are the Oilers a better team? No, they lost that trade. Are they a more well balanced team? Sure
 

The List Of Jericho

Judas effect
Mar 1, 2002
18,024
3,500
Toronto
I've seen this brought up several times this thread.

Do you realise the Kessel trade was considered Brian Burke's biggest mistake ever and one of the worst fleecings of the past decade??

Kessel was traded for Tyler Seguin Dougie Hamilton and Jared Knight.


So.. if you're trying to tarnish Chia for bad trades, this example works against you.

It was only considered a fleecing because the Leafs finished so poorly in the standings, how was Burke suppose to see that playing out the way it did. He acquired a quality sniper for a bunch of what if's....if Boston had drafted a bust instead of Dougie Hamilton, no one would be saying anything.
 

CantHaveTkachev

Cap Space > NHL players
Nov 30, 2004
52,341
34,392
St. OILbert, AB
Avs need RNH why? They have a bunch of centreman already.

because Roy and Sakic are crazy...they flat-out said last year that ROR wasn't available then turn around and trade soon after

Oilers will be monitoring the Barrie arbitration situation very closely...is Colorado willing to pay upwards of 6 million for Tyson?
 

PatrikOverAuston

Laine > Matthews
Jun 22, 2016
3,573
989
Winnipeg
No, but Hall really wasn't worth what HF thought or, more specifically, what Edmonton fans thought. I've been telling them for years D-men are more valuable then wingers, but "noooooooo". Yesterday was a great day for me.

Me: "How about Fowler + Ritchie + 2nd for Hall"
EDM fans: "Ha... you want Hall, we want Lindholm"
Me: "Nah... Lindholm is worth more".
EDM fans: ":facepalm: Hall is a top 3 LW. He's worth a #1D".

This just in, Hall has been trade for Adam Larsson in a 1-for-1. :laugh::laugh::laugh:

One of those gloating posts. If you get a lot out of constructing strawmen and beating them down, then sure, I guess you won the day. If that's important to you, that's great.

But the thing you don't want to discuss- the Oilers becoming a more balanced team- was the real win for Chiarelli and company. It's also not a deal that should surprise anyone from a value perspective; Jones for Johansen set the table. This was just the winger version of that.
 

tempest2i

Jigsaw Falling Into Place
Oct 25, 2009
9,118
91
Cowtown
From TSN this A.M.

"Lucic is believed to have turned down a six-year, $36 million offer from Los Angeles, allowing him to hit the market. He's reportedly being courted by 10 or more teams with the thought that his new deal will exceed $40 million - perhaps at $42 million - over seven years."

If he signs Lucic 7 years 42 Million, that would be a questionable deal.

He's going to be a UFA. He's probably going to be offered multiple questionable deals and be able to take the one he likes the best. That's just what happens.
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,009
31,483
Buffalo flatly turned down Ristolainen for Hall because there is a line of how good a D a winger will get you. The line is somewhere between Ristolainen and Larsson.

The lesson is maybe drafthe a D or 2 with all the picks you were handed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad