Rumor: Peter Chiarelli is not done?

mdobbs

Registered User
Oct 21, 2010
2,149
507
Larsson is on the upswing but he hasnt established himself to be better than a 2nd pairing guy yet.. Same can be said for Klefbom. It is really not a knock on Larsson when he is called a 2nd pairing player.

Larsson was 45th in the league in TOI\game (22:30) and 68th in shifts\game.

Not sure if I buy Chiarelli's comment that Larsson can play 26 or 28 mins \ game.

I completely disagree. Larsson has already shown when paired with Greene that they were one of the best defensive pairings in the NHL. He was a + player on a significantly - team and together with Greene had the best GA/60 in the league.

This was playing some of the toughest minutes in the NHL. If you look at OppCF/60 the only players ahead of him and Greene were Keith, Hjallmarsson, Erik Johnson and Matt Hunwick.

While it's not clear how much Greene helped him (he definitely did) I think Larsson is already a top pairing dman based on his defense alone.
 

mytduxfan*

Guest
No player is as valuable as hf thinks. Most valuations are completely laughable.

No, but Hall really wasn't worth what HF thought or, more specifically, what Edmonton fans thought. I've been telling them for years D-men are more valuable then wingers, but "noooooooo". Yesterday was a great day for me.

Me: "How about Fowler + Ritchie + 2nd for Hall"
EDM fans: "Ha... you want Hall, we want Lindholm"
Me: "Nah... Lindholm is worth more".
EDM fans: ":facepalm: Hall is a top 3 LW. He's worth a #1D".

This just in, Hall has been trade for Adam Larsson in a 1-for-1. :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

Got One Cup

Registered User
Jun 3, 2008
4,102
1,284
No, but Hall really wasn't worth what HF thought or, more specifically, what Edmonton fans thought. I've been telling them for years D-men are more valuable then wingers, but "noooooooo". Yesterday was a great day for me.

Me: "How about Fowler + Ritchie + 2nd for Hall"
EDM fans: "Ha... you want Hall, we want Lindholm"
Me: "Nah... Lindholm is worth more".
EDM fans: ":facepalm: Hall is a top 3 LW. He's worth a #1D".

This just in, Hall has been trade for Adam Larsson in a 1-for-1. :laugh::laugh::laugh:

Have to agree with you. I don't know how many Oiler fans said Hall would bring back Petro. They did get low value for Hall but he wasn't bringing back the caliber dman edm fans thought he would. If he was a center playing at that level then I could see it.
 

behemolari

öh¨ns-ä
Dec 1, 2011
6,458
3,059
Have to agree with you. I don't know how many Oiler fans said Hall would bring back Petro. They did get low value for Hall but he wasn't bringing back the caliber dman edm fans thought he would. If he was a center playing at that level then I could see it.

it just seems top centres and defenders are much more valuable in reality that HF people generally thinks, Edmonton have drafted too much wingers and now they need to fix that and price is ugly.

they will become a proper team eventually
 

varano

Registered User
Jun 27, 2013
5,161
1,917
Oh gosh how is this guy going to get fleeced next....

Eberle for flames season tickets?
 

Got One Cup

Registered User
Jun 3, 2008
4,102
1,284
it just seems top centres and defenders are much more valuable in reality that HF people generally thinks, Edmonton have drafted too much wingers and now they need to fix that and price is ugly.

they will become a proper team eventually

Just goes to show you taking the BPA is not always the best thing to do.
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,008
31,479
Every GM in the league is furiously rubbing their hands together like a cartoon villain with a scheme in mind.

Bergevin is doing it wrong
 

mytduxfan*

Guest
Have to agree with you. I don't know how many Oiler fans said Hall would bring back Petro. They did get low value for Hall but he wasn't bringing back the caliber dman edm fans thought he would. If he was a center playing at that level then I could see it.

Yeah, if Hall was an elite #1C, he'd be bringing back at #1D or at least a Jones/Ekblad/Lindholm level future #1D. IMO, Larsson's ceiling is only #2D.
 

KPower

Registered User
Jan 17, 2012
9,383
4,393
I completely disagree. Larsson has already shown when paired with Greene that they were one of the best defensive pairings in the NHL. He was a + player on a significantly - team and together with Greene had the best GA/60 in the league.

This was playing some of the toughest minutes in the NHL. If you look at OppCF/60 the only players ahead of him and Greene were Keith, Hjallmarsson, Erik Johnson and Matt Hunwick.

While it's not clear how much Greene helped him (he definitely did) I think Larsson is already a top pairing dman based on his defense alone.
Well he won't be playing with Greene in Edmonton and won't have Schneider behind him.
 

blueshead

Registered User
Jun 22, 2004
166
0
No, we need an offensive D.

To Edmonton
Shattenkirk
Vannelli

To St Louis
RNH
Conditional 1st if Shatty re-signs

Gives Edm a year to convince Shatty to re-sign and decide if cost is worth it and Vannelli gives them a prospective replacement if they dont.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
To Edmonton
Shattenkirk
Vannelli

To St Louis
RNH
Conditional 1st if Shatty re-signs

Gives Edm a year to convince Shatty to re-sign and decide if cost is worth it and Vannelli gives them a prospective replacement if they dont.


The conditional is on the wrong side. Edmonton gets the Blues 1st in 2018 if Shatty doesn't re-sign.
 

ulvvf

Registered User
May 9, 2014
2,744
150
it just seems top centres and defenders are much more valuable in reality that HF people generally thinks, Edmonton have drafted too much wingers and now they need to fix that and price is ugly.

they will become a proper team eventually

They have to many centers not wingers. What winger do they have now?`None of really good caliber unless Puljo works out. While they have RNH as a third line center.

Btw, Edmonton have drafted a lot of d-men. They drafted 3 in the third round this years, pretty much only d-men last years beside McDavid etc, and do not forget players like Nurse and Klefbom. They have drafted d-men.

The only really bad top draft-pick they have done is Yakupov.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
They have to many centers not wingers. What winger do they have now?`None of really good caliber unless Puljo works out. While they have RNH as a third line center.

Btw, Edmonton have drafted a lot of d-men. They drafted 3 in the third round this years, pretty much only d-men last years beside McDavid etc, and do not forget players like Nurse and Klefbom. They have drafted d-men.

The only really bad top draft-pick they have done is Yakupov.


Wingers? We trade one and suddenly don't have any?

Left - Pouliot, Maroon, Hendricks, possibly Lucic.

Right - Eberle, Kassian, Puljujarvi, Draisaitl was solid on the right wing last year.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
I completely disagree. Larsson has already shown when paired with Greene that they were one of the best defensive pairings in the NHL. He was a + player on a significantly - team and together with Greene had the best GA/60 in the league.

This was playing some of the toughest minutes in the NHL. If you look at OppCF/60 the only players ahead of him and Greene were Keith, Hjallmarsson, Erik Johnson and Matt Hunwick.

While it's not clear how much Greene helped him (he definitely did) I think Larsson is already a top pairing dman based on his defense alone.

At worst his is among the best #3 defensemen. Still has #1 upside too.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad