Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 30,525
- 26,043
There'll be emerging top 6 talents that go UFA just like every year. We'll find someone if Zucker is being let go.
That being said, I'd like Bertuzzi the most off that list, at least in terms of realistic acquisitions.
I wouldn't have given 6.5 this summer to a winger unless he's a difference maker on PP1, which Kane or Miller would have been.
A few maybe. Zacha if he's playing wing rather than C. Otherwise, Trevor Lewis and Andrei Kuzmenko look like the only two candidates at this point. Not enough to shake my belief that it's a weak pool and the more people fishing in it, the worse it goes for our chances of achieving good things.
I agree that the 4M doesn't do us favours relative to other teams, but I disagree in that I think it will make us more likely to go big game hunting for that winger. Hextall viewed things more like me this summer, where he preferred balance. He'll have more leeway now to change that approach a little.
But handing out 6.5m - more than most are worth as you point out - or so to a top 6 winger would be balanced. That's just Zucker's money plus the cap increase, rebalancing the rest of the team (plus JJ's lower buyout hit) to cope with Jarry's increased cap hit. Even just handing out Zucker's money again probably gets a top 6 wing. That extra 4m is only needed if he planned to spend less on the top 6 than he currently does, which isn't balance, it's skewing away from spending enough.
Honestly if the team really looks strong at the deadline then I'd just say to hell with it and pay what it takes for Kane. The window is almost gone, and I don't see anyone else giving us a better chance this season.
If it fails then it fails, but at least they'll have given themselves a shot. It will take something special to help us beat contenders now. May have to face New York again or Carolina in R1.
It seems to me the success rate of integrating guys like Coleman and Goodrow, Hainsey and Schultz, Lehkonen and Cogliano, Vermette and Kempney, is a lot higher than that of integrating your big name top 6 forwards. Lower expectations, easier roles, less noses out of joint.
As such, I'd far rather go that route if we're looking to go all in than put it all on one guy.