Empoleon8771
Registered User
So off the top of my head, it's quite common for lines involving big time netfront guys to have high xGF that doesn't convert because calling those net front scrambles high danger chances in the same way cross slot passes are high danger doesn't really carry through.
And by off of the top of my head I mean this fits my memories of pouring through stats of previous Penguins lines involving Hornqvist.
But Zucker-Malkin posted a 3.04 gf/60. That beat Sid and Jake. Yeah they probably left money on the table but I'm not overly inclined to point fingers at that outcome and suspect it was probably fair. I would worry more about them conceding so much.
That said, more goals would be nice, but I think it would depend on being around a stronger transition game to get them on the rush more.
I think it's both, the 2nd line should have produced more and they should have conceded less based on how they played.
I don't think a difference between a 3.04 GF/60 and a 3.65 xGF/60 can be just explained with Zucker being a net front guy. And beyond that, I also think Zucker scored a lot of goals from afar with his shot.
I honestly think it's mostly because Rust had such a bad season in terms of finishing, and just replacing Rust with Smith on last year's 2nd line would yield a substantially better producing 2nd line. Rust only shot 9.5% last year, which was way down from where he was at in the 3 previous years (17.9, 14.3 and 13.3). That difference doesn't seem that big, but that's a difference of 8 or 9 goals over a full season with how many shots Rust takes. If Rust would have shot 15.1% like he did in the 3 previous years, he would have had 32 goals instead of 20 goals.
Rakell also falls in that category as well. His production was masked by his PP production, but he was also underproducing a fair bit relative to expectations at 5v5. He only shot 9.41% at 5v5 and was about 5 goals below expected at 5v5. Rakell got a bunch of powerplay luck though, so it ended up evening out to him producing about what he should have produced. For comparison, Rust shot at 8.24% and was 6 goals below expected at 5v5.