Rumor: Pens and Canucks talking trade

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,434
84,643
Redmond, WA
Show me the bolded. I didn't read that anywhere.

You've had 2 people say Kapanen was redundant in Vancouver (despite him fitting literally every single bullet point mentioned in the OP) and you also had someone else suggest the Canucks would put no value on Kapanen whatsoever.

That seems to be pretty clearly pretending Kapanen is a nothing asset.

So did Kapanen never even get PP2 time?

Boeser got 681 powerplay minutes from 2018-2020. Kapanen got 212.

Boeser is a better powerplay player, and you can see that from their per 60 production on the powerplay (3.8 for Boeser, 2.0 for Kapanen). But it's not an apples to apples comparison, because Kapanen doesn't get the same minutes with the same caliber of teammates on the powerplay that Boeser has received.
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,409
7,333
Rutherford said that teams already calling him on players before he even before he landed in Vancouver about certain players. Words spread fast around here.
 
Last edited:

Your Boy Troy

Registered User
Sep 19, 2013
2,833
776
Brampton, Ontario
I know that the Canucks’ penalty kill has been in shambles, so maybe someone like Zach Aston-Reese would make sense. The management might be eager to give Drew O’Connor a permanent spot.
 

Boondock

Registered User
Feb 6, 2009
5,780
2,390
You've had 2 people say Kapanen was redundant in Vancouver (despite him fitting literally every single bullet point mentioned in the OP) and you also had someone else suggest the Canucks would put no value on Kapanen whatsoever.

That seems to be pretty clearly pretending Kapanen is a nothing asset.



Boeser got 681 powerplay minutes from 2018-2020. Kapanen got 212.

Boeser is a better powerplay player, and you can see that from their per 60 production on the powerplay (3.8 for Boeser, 2.0 for Kapanen). But it's not an apples to apples comparison, because Kapanen doesn't get the same minutes with the same caliber of teammates on the powerplay that Boeser has received.
So 2 people stated that since the Canucks already have Miller, Boeser, Podkolzin, Garland, Hoglander and Pearson playing top 9 winger it wouldn't make a lot of sense to trade away assets to add another winger when our biggest need is RHD - and in your view saying Kap is redundant translates to "He's a nothing player and Boeser is amazing". I don't know how I didn't see it the same way now....
 

3074326

Registered User
Apr 9, 2009
11,681
11,231
USA
Rutherford said that teams already calling him on players before he even before he landed in Vancouver about certain players. Words spread fast around here.

I don't blame them. If we know one thing about JR, it's that he will trade players like he's playing a video game. Sometimes, it works. But those other times....
 
  • Like
Reactions: lawrence
Feb 19, 2018
2,682
1,870
I don't blame them. If we know one thing about JR, it's that he will trade players like he's playing a video game. Sometimes, it works. But those other times....
Well he clearly has a vision of what he wants. That is a major step in the right direction for the Canucks
 
Feb 19, 2018
2,682
1,870
With Rutherford, I imagine he has set targets he wants and sometimes needs to make a trade with another team in order to acquire the asset the other team would like.
 

Peter Griffin

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
35,065
7,479
Visit site
JR said he’s not likely to do anything until after their roadtrip in mid-January. They also play 5 games in that span against teams directly ahead of them in their division so should have a better idea whether a playoff spot is even within reach by that point.
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,409
7,333
I don't blame them. If we know one thing about JR, it's that he will trade players like he's playing a video game. Sometimes, it works. But those other times....

funny during the q and a, one guy asked that he said he uses analytics, but he proceeds to bring up jack Johnson and gudbranson as pieces he’s brought in, and questioned him about those transactions if he really did use analytics.
 
Feb 19, 2018
2,682
1,870
Marino+ for Miller.
That would not be a target of mine. Marino would be on the low end. Better come with a first and second and that won’t be happening due to roster makeup of the pens. We retain 50% and with two playoff runs at 2.75 million the second year and pro rated the rest of this year he is one of the best trade assets in the league.
 

mriswith

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
4,411
8,023
I can't imagine Rutherford makes a significant trade before hiring a GM. That would be extremely stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: elitepete

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
15,032
12,306
I think if it was Marino + 1st + 2nd, That's a much more realistic proposal, and fits team needs much more.
But based on what pens fans are saying, Marino is a bit of a fan favorite, Doubt that happens.

Marino + 1st + 2nd for Miller and what else?
 

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
15,032
12,306
I am Legit starting to think you are Kasperi Kapanen.

And just like you think that Brock Boeser is incredibly Overrated,
You are Incredibly underrating JT MIller in the same context.

Boeser is a PP specialist, he does not do a whole lot at ES. Considering how much players like that are looked down on HFboards, I don't see why you're picking on him for what he said.
 

CascadiaPenguin

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2017
4,262
3,925
The Salish Sea
Rutherford loves Zucker. He tried to trade Kessel for him and ended up trading a first rounder for him the following season. I'm not saying it's a great idea...just that it's absolutely a Rutherford move.
Wait until POHO JR calls Colorado regarding Jack Johnson. Poor Canucks, they deserve better...
 

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
15,032
12,306

As was posted previously, he was compared to and put up identical stats to Kapanen over the last 4 year at ES in both points/game and per60.

Boeser does not put up good numbers at ES, while he does on the PP. If that is not a PP specialist then show me what is.

Also, please refrain from 1 word posts like "wrong" if you want to have an actual conversation. Otherwise it makes you look ignorant
 

elitepete

Registered User
Jan 30, 2017
8,178
5,514
Vancouver
As was posted previously, he's identical to Kapanen over the last 4 year at ES in both points/game and per60. Boeser does not put up good numbers at ES, while he does at PP. If that is not a PP specialist then show me what is
He had 4 less even strength points than Guentzel last year, despite Guentzal's point totals being inflated due to playing with Crosby.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,434
84,643
Redmond, WA
Calling Boeser a PP specialist is fake news. The point I was making with showing those stats was that Kapanen was as good of an ES producer as Boeser, not that Boeser was a bad ES producer.
 

elitepete

Registered User
Jan 30, 2017
8,178
5,514
Vancouver
At worst, Kapanen is a 45-50 point top-6 winger who brings a ton of speed. At best, he clicks with a star player and can elevate into a 50-60 point top-6 winger.
"At worst, Kapanen is something he has never accomplished in his career"

Lol.
It's because Boeser is comically overrated on this webstie. Boeser and Kapanen have virtually identical ES stat lines over the last 4 years.
Boeser's stats from 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 are not that relevant to what he is now, he wasn't far enough removed from his injuries.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad