Speculation: Penguins off day talk thread: Yes, Sully is still the coach

Status
Not open for further replies.

vodeni

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
30,691
15,631
Pittsburgh
They’re both dynamic offensive players (well, Geno not as dynamic anymore lol) and they are not really a fit to play in a NZ trap system that Sullivan wants to employ…he has to do a better job putting them in positions to utilize their best attributes and he’s not…for example, G and EK give up more goals when theyare on the ice together than when they play with other D pairs or forward lines respectively…yet they were on the ice together for the final Vegas goal
that was a stinker of a game, and it all comes down to his effort and skating...One thing that I have been pondering all these years...Has anyone tried to coach him the last 6-7 years...As he was losing this burst and first step ...If I were Penguins coach I pulled him over in the camp and just drill him: Skate, stop, skate stop skate stop, forecheck, stop, the dman have tape on Malkin, they just need to skate to their side and He is already flown by, leaving a ton of room for dman to brake out of their zone easily...in our zone, he fights hard on the wall, but once in open, he again cheats leaving most of the time someone open, hence a lot of goals against...he also lost confidence, not charging forward, towards the goal, seeing their net as ultimate end point, instead, looking for atrailer, looping around, etc...
We know he is not player he used to be, but I think he could be coached and put in position to help more
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

DesertedPenguin

Registered User
Mar 11, 2007
7,429
8,342
The mentality issues are on Sully though. It happening one game is on the players. It's been happening for 6 years now, with players that have previously been far better at it.
It's on both. The veteran players should have an understanding of what to do, but if Sullivan's system is too complex or confusing, then he also needs to modify it.
 

cygnus47

Registered User
Sep 14, 2013
7,597
2,693
It's on both. The veteran players should have an understanding of what to do, but if Sullivan's system is too complex or confusing, then he also needs to modify it.

I don't think it's a system thing, I think it's a coach that's been around too long and doesn't have the distance needed to motivate the team.
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,608
34,408
Pens are back to being alone in 7th place in the Metro and now 5 points out of WC spot, which is now 53 points with the Wings win tonight and Tampa yesterday…Isles got a new coach bump and win…I hope Dubas is looking to make some trades soon or fire Sullivan lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Invalid cuz QoC

Josey Wales

Registered User
May 16, 2022
3,556
1,331
Pens are back to being alone in 7th place in the Metro and now 5 points out of WC spot, which is now 53 points with the Wings win tonight and Tampa yesterday…Isles got a new coach bump and win…I hope Dubas is looking to make some trades soon or fire Sullivan lol
GOOD LORD ! take Your Meds, Nothing is going to make a Difference
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,608
34,408
That's not nice, Andy.

I might not agree much with DP but he's not a blathering, boot-licking hack like Yohe.
You’re right…much more intelligent defense of Sullivan but a defense of Sullivan that still justifies almost everything he does lol
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,248
78,126
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Yeah, it's a bit much.

"• He needs a different level from Erik Karlsson, whose impact in recent weeks has been minimal. His performance on the power play has been subpar and his decision-making has been puzzling. The talent is there. So is his desire to make this work. But it’s not, and Sullivan must find the key to turning Karlsson’s season around."

He does realize EK65 is on an 8 game point streak and has 10 points in his last 10 right?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BusinessGoose

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,608
34,408
I'm actually willing to criticize Sullivan when warranted.
Ok, it’s just that your view of when it’s “warranted” is pretty restrictive imo…

the coach still doesn’t use his personnel well and put them in the best positions to succeed..he also has a lot of players on his roster, a roster he helped put together, who aren’t great defensive players and yet he wants to play stifling defensive style…if it wasn’t for the goaltending, we’d probably be last in the East lol
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,993
30,913
Josh Yohe will be at the beck and call for stalwart defense of Sullivan up until the day he's fired in like 2050 or whatever. And then on that day he'll claim he never much cared for him and will start connecting all kinds of past missteps to him long after it matters at all.

DP actually says stuff like "yeah this is kind of f***ed and if it continues requires consequences."
 

DesertedPenguin

Registered User
Mar 11, 2007
7,429
8,342
Josh Yohe will be at the beck and call for stalwart defense of Sullivan up until the day he's fired in like 2050 or whatever. And then on that day he'll claim he never much cared for him and will start connecting all kinds of past missteps to him long after it matters at all.

DP actually says stuff like "yeah this is kind of f***ed and if it continues requires consequences."
I'm at the point where the power play's failure is a fireable offense on its own. I just have a huge philosophical issue with midseason coaching changes. I would rather play out the season, waste a season, and hire the best candidate in the offseason. You have a greater likelihood of creating a sustained impact rather than a two-week bump that then falls apart spectacularly.

This team is Minnesota, not Edmonton. It has some solid pieces and parts, including a still elite Sidney Crosby, but it doesn't have McDavid and Draisatl going on tandem heaters.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,993
30,913
I'm at the point where the power play's failure is a fireable offense on its own. I just have a huge philosophical issue with midseason coaching changes. I would rather play out the season, waste a season, and hire the best candidate in the offseason. You have a greater likelihood of creating a sustained impact rather than a two-week bump that then falls apart spectacularly.

This team is Minnesota, not Edmonton. It has some solid pieces and parts, including a still elite Sidney Crosby, but it doesn't have McDavid and Draisatl going on tandem heaters.

Eh. I understand what you mean but I feel like this can just lead to an endless cycle of complacency. When the dust is settled it becomes easier to sit back and excuse everything away and eventually circle back around to "well we still like Mike enough that there just aren't QUITE enough compelling reasons to fire him so let's give him another year to work his magic. He's still under contract, after all!"

Just rip the damn bandage off and see what happens. If your interim staff blows then you're still out of the playoffs but the pick gets ever better. Boo hoo. At least you've removed the rot and at the same time had a good look at the options you already had in-house. THEN take it to the off season. With an empty bench and MOTIVATION to fill it.
 

DesertedPenguin

Registered User
Mar 11, 2007
7,429
8,342
Eh. I understand what you mean but I feel like this can just lead to an endless cycle of complacency. When the dust is settled it becomes easier to sit back and excuse everything away and eventually circle back around to "well we still like Mike enough that there just aren't QUITE enough compelling reasons to fire him so let's give him another year to work his magic. He's still under contract, after all!"

Just rip the damn bandage off and see what happens. If your interim staff blows then you're still out of the playoffs but the pick gets ever better. Boo hoo. At least you've removed the rot and at the same time had a good look at the options you already had in-house. THEN take it to the off season. With an empty bench and MOTIVATION to fill it.
If there were other internal options, maybe I'd be for it.

But my biggest fear is that if they fire Sullivan, they'll promote either Reirden or Vellucci, and I am convinced that they'll be an abject disaster. I think they're terrible assistant coaches. I desperately want an outside voice and perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlindWillyMcHurt

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,993
30,913
If there were other internal options, maybe I'd be for it.

But my biggest fear is that if they fire Sullivan, they'll promote either Reirden or Vellucci, and I am convinced that they'll be an abject disaster. I think they're terrible assistant coaches. I desperately want an outside voice and perspective.

A legit concern but at this point I just don't care. So what if those guys suck? Only the most rosy-eyed optimist sees this team as even playoff caliber. Nevermind winning anything of significance. So what... Toddddddddd and/or Looch fly the plane into the ground and that middling like 15th overall suddenly becomes top ten AND you have legit reason to tell them to sit and spin their way out the door. Sounds like kind of a win to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,904
10,864
I'm at the point where the power play's failure is a fireable offense on its own. I just have a huge philosophical issue with midseason coaching changes. I would rather play out the season, waste a season, and hire the best candidate in the offseason. You have a greater likelihood of creating a sustained impact rather than a two-week bump that then falls apart spectacularly.

This team is Minnesota, not Edmonton. It has some solid pieces and parts, including a still elite Sidney Crosby, but it doesn't have McDavid and Draisatl going on tandem heaters.
How a Penguin fan of all people could come to this conclusion is very confusing to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad