majormajor
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 26,774
- 32,925
This is what happens when a team is bad. We start flinging spaghetti against the wall, all the players are bad now.
When Gaudreau and Laine are on the ice they're not bad. They don't have a 1C between them and they frequently don't have any NHL caliber D out there with them. The team as a whole has no rhythm. But those two are still at least breaking even in chances and goals. So we can critique elements of their play but it's silly to connect their play to "this is why the Blue Jackets suck".
Bjorkstrand's retrievals and board work were pretty remarkable though. He always has that to fall back on when the shooting luck ebbs. He just becomes a strong checking forward until the shooting comes back.
It's kind of like the Mitch Hedberg joke about escalators temporarily becoming stairs. They still work!
I don't think Laine brings that when he isn't scoring. He's not a big drag like he was in his first year as a Jacket but he's often not helpful either.
I feel the same as you. We had a hardworking team that had a chance to beat almost any team and plenty of folks hated it and wanted to throw it away for fancy skill. The grass isn't greener.
I still don't think you get it with Bjorky if you think he's just going to be a third liner forever. Don't judge a guy when he is shooting at about 1/3 of his career percentages.
Laine has some great backchecks but he is still subpar on boardwork and retrievals. Could be probably use some lessons from Bjorkstrand.
Yeah we're not even getting a 2C for Laine. He isn't a movable property. Let's just hope he plays well and stops getting injured because he isn't going anywhere.
I think we're probably 2+ years away from being good again but it is really harder and harder to predict the further you go out. We really don't know what's going on five years from now. Who predicted three years ago that Jason Robertson and Tage Thomson would be top 4 in league scoring?
When Gaudreau and Laine are on the ice they're not bad. They don't have a 1C between them and they frequently don't have any NHL caliber D out there with them. The team as a whole has no rhythm. But those two are still at least breaking even in chances and goals. So we can critique elements of their play but it's silly to connect their play to "this is why the Blue Jackets suck".
VT you are completely obsessed with both Laine and Bjorkstrand.
They are different players and bring different things. “Forechecking” and “playing the boards” is NOT what Bjorkstrand brought to the team. He was a GREAT shooter/goal scorer who ALSO did those things more consistently than many offensive players of the same quality/ability.
While Laine s a better pure shooter than most NHL players, he SIGNIFICANTLY LACKS SO MANY OTHER THINGS, whether in relation to Bjorkstrand, ACTUAL SUPERSTARS, or middling grinder 3rd-4th line guys.
Laine doesn’t do the things needed to play up to his “potential”. Like Roslovic, at some point, the “potential” should be seen as unattainable.
All some of you care about is fantasy stats. The record of SEA this year and the records of many “Bjorkstrand led”- PLAYOFF BOUND CBJ teams, is not a coincidence, as is the play and overall health of “Laine led” teams, as shown over MULTIPLE TEAMS.
Bjorkstrand's retrievals and board work were pretty remarkable though. He always has that to fall back on when the shooting luck ebbs. He just becomes a strong checking forward until the shooting comes back.
It's kind of like the Mitch Hedberg joke about escalators temporarily becoming stairs. They still work!
I don't think Laine brings that when he isn't scoring. He's not a big drag like he was in his first year as a Jacket but he's often not helpful either.
The point/joke is that I HATE all the IDIOTS who called all the guaranteed playoff CBJ teams (and HOW they played) MEDIOCRE year after year.
Congrats!!
Doesn’t get much more EXCITING than Tage Thompson!! Oh wait, other than Laine!!
I feel the same as you. We had a hardworking team that had a chance to beat almost any team and plenty of folks hated it and wanted to throw it away for fancy skill. The grass isn't greener.
I'm not against Bjorkie, I never considered trading him (well, only when I wanted to tease you and @majormajor ), what happened was quite an unpleasant shock for me. Also you know damn well that I was one of those who said his horrendous +/- meant nothing.
It's just that you keep failing to notice that Laine is improving in other aspects of the game. Besides he isn't only a sniper anymore but he's better in backchecking for example. I only used Bjorkie as an example of your selectivity.
Play-off?
I still don't think you get it with Bjorky if you think he's just going to be a third liner forever. Don't judge a guy when he is shooting at about 1/3 of his career percentages.
Laine has some great backchecks but he is still subpar on boardwork and retrievals. Could be probably use some lessons from Bjorkstrand.
I disagree with this premise.
The problem is that nobody is trading a higher-end C or D for a winger. Any winger. Especially if said winger is as one-way as you assert Laine is. And before you point out to how Laine got here to begin with - PLD was forcing his way out to the point of skipping shifts with effort so poor it made national news. 1) That's not happening again anytime soon and 2) even if it did I don't want that kind of player anywhere near this team and I don't think you do either.
Yeah we're not even getting a 2C for Laine. He isn't a movable property. Let's just hope he plays well and stops getting injured because he isn't going anywhere.
The problem is that the “timelines” do not fit with these guys and the vet’s currently on the roster. And we’ve already played the BS best case scenario with every prospect 5 year plan thing before.
At minimum these young guys are nearly a half decade away from being some “powerhouse” or playoff team. Johnson is going to be a top line guy, and Sillinger looks to be a good 2C. Chinakhov a top 6 winger. IN THE FUTURE. When that actually occurs, who knows.
On defense there is even more question marks. Jiricek/Mateychuk/Ceulemans may be no more than #3-4 D Men. Maybe top pairing. But when? This is assuming it’s quick enough where Werenski is still playing at a high enough level to be considered a #1.
Your out of your mind if you think Jenner/Gaudreau are just hanging around 3-4-5 years for all these young guys to POSSIBLY “blossom”.
We have assets. Again, we need a top 6 “veteran” center, and a RIGHT NOW top pairing defender. Things could be ADDED to Laine of actual value, not a Roslovic.
Even if they give up on this year and let everything play out terribly, this summer I think you see unexpected (to some) moves.
Is there some sort of limit on how many players you can add into a trade that I don’t know about??
A Laine+ package could be put together.
I think we're probably 2+ years away from being good again but it is really harder and harder to predict the further you go out. We really don't know what's going on five years from now. Who predicted three years ago that Jason Robertson and Tage Thomson would be top 4 in league scoring?