ArGarBarGar
What do we want!? Unfair!
- Sep 8, 2008
- 44,074
- 11,863
Parents who force a vegan diet on to their children would face prison under a new law
- Thread starter John Price
- Start date
kmart
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2008
- 4,358
- 675
i actually wrote
you can interpret/word it for you as u please
nice deflection btw
Siamese Dream
Registered User
Actually you wrote: "its like rasing ur kid gay or forcing the kid to have a religion, u just dont have to do it."
Kid, you're gay? Sorry to hear, but I'm not going to raise you that way. I just don't have to do it.
Siamese Dream
Registered User
I think you're completely misunderstanding what he's saying.
He's saying it's like conditioning a kid to be gay literally from birth, before they have any concept of what sexuality actually is. It's like the opposite of how society has always conditioned kids to be heterosexual through every medium possible for example popular culture.
irunthepeg
Board man gets paid
I'm glad someone can translate the nonsensical garbage he's spewing.
We shouldn't be conditioning children to be any sexuality. They should dress who they want, play with what and who they want, watch what they want, etc. **** gender stereotypes.
That said, again, I see no comparison in allowing a child to be who they want to be and teaching a child compassion, non-violence, and love (veganism).
It's far more ****ed up to teach a child that it's okay to kill animals for your own selfishness than it is to "force" a child to practice a life of non-harming.
Mantis
I am a doctah
Siamese Dream
Registered User
And yet you still miss the point
He didn't say anything about "allowing a child to be who they want to be"
He is saying it's like doing the opposite of what society currently does (even though this is changing in modern times)
Before kids had any understanding of the concept of sexuality they were still always taught about male/female companionship which they understand because of their parents and things like toys (Barbie and Ken) and Disney movies with Princes and Princesses.
When he says "forcing a kid to be gay" it's not entirely forcing because you can't magically make them gay but you can condition them that homosexuality is the "normal" accepted lifestyle in society. It's the fear of those who disagree with same sex couples adopting children, that they will try to raise them to be homosexual.
Guerzy
I'm a fricken baby
- Jan 16, 2005
- 39,830
- 3,111
John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 384,988
- 30,519
Zorf
Apparently I'm entitled?
- Jan 4, 2008
- 4,946
- 1,566
So eating a healthy, balanced diet is being selfish?
I hate this argument on killing an animal. The animals are bred to be eaten. That's their purpose in life. If we don't eat chickens, then what purpose would they have? they are crap at flying, so all they would be is easy targets for predator animals. So you want these poor, defenceless birds to suffer the horrible experience of being chewed to death? That's terrible. You should save the chickens from such torture and eat them after they have been given a quick, clean death.
Mantis
I am a doctah
Siamese Dream
Registered User
Zorf
Apparently I'm entitled?
- Jan 4, 2008
- 4,946
- 1,566
And it's not even a joke when I say this. It sounds completely mental, but think about it for a second.
If we were to stop eating chickens tomorrow. The whole world went vegetarian or vegan. That's billions of birds that will just be released to the wild. IT would be mayhem. Predator animal populations would boom, crops would be destroyed by these stupid chickens eating everything. Their crap would poison the dirt in fields. It would be an ecological disaster.
So, if we were to stop eating chicken tomorrow, the first thing we would have to do would be to actually kill all of the chickens and not set them free. Which is hilarious to me. Hey animal lovers! We're not eating chicken anymore! But because you are so dumb and didn't think of what would happen next, we now need to kill every chicken.
And I didn't even mention other farm animals.
If we were to stop eating chickens tomorrow. The whole world went vegetarian or vegan. That's billions of birds that will just be released to the wild. IT would be mayhem. Predator animal populations would boom, crops would be destroyed by these stupid chickens eating everything. Their crap would poison the dirt in fields. It would be an ecological disaster.
So, if we were to stop eating chicken tomorrow, the first thing we would have to do would be to actually kill all of the chickens and not set them free. Which is hilarious to me. Hey animal lovers! We're not eating chicken anymore! But because you are so dumb and didn't think of what would happen next, we now need to kill every chicken.
And I didn't even mention other farm animals.
John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 384,988
- 30,519
Siamese Dream
Registered User
Well then they wouldn't be bred. Would it be okay to breed humans to be slaves with the justification that "well that's what they were bred for, they wouldn't even be alive otherwise so it's fine to make them our slaves"?
How is it any different? Animals have feelings just like we do. They don't want to live confined to a cage before being brutally slaughtered any more than a human wants to be chained up and live their life as a slave.
Killing all the chickens one time and being done with it is hardly comparable to killing all the chickens anyway and then continuing to breed and kill every other chicken for the rest of our existence.
Once again just the stupidest logic I've ever come across.
