Interesting article, thanks for sharing.
The fight in case anyone missed it, or just wants to see it again.
He requested a trade.The Bryant trade is looking very bad at this point. I don't see goaltending as the issue, the shaky defence is for sure.
Hindsight is always 20/20, no way anybody would have predicted that a 17 year old who scored 28 times last year would fall off a cliff offensively at 18. As much as it hurts to lose a player like Bryant, if they don't want to be here then you have to move on. I personally thought the trade looked good for the Attack when it happened considering the circumstances so it would be tough for me to sit here and criticize Dale for it now. Sometimes it just doesn't work.He requested a trade.
Twice
Does his job become clear or does his job security become in question as well... I love DD and most of his trades have been decent enough however this team deserves a chance to actually go for it one time and not just be status quo for the 30 win seasons. At what point does that not become enough and the fans, owners and players want something more. I for one am ready to live with a few down seasons if it means we took a legit Crack at it one time but that's not the way he does business.It's going to be a very telling weekend for the Attack. They essentially had their character questioned, very publicly at that through the media, after Wednesday's no show performance. If we don't see any form of response this weekend then I think that seals this team's fate in terms of what direction DeGray chooses to take the team. The weekend's games will show if the players are willing to fight for their season. If we don't see any improvements in terms of effort and compete then Dale's job becomes quite clear moving forward.
I don't think Dale's job is in jeopardy, nor do I think it should be. I think this is where having an experienced steady hand at the helm is a good thing. I don't expect Dale to make any irrational moves. While we all expected better this season I don't think Dale will try and push the round peg in to the square hole. He'll make the course correction that's required.Does his job become clear or does his job security become in question as well... I love DD and most of his trades have been decent enough however this team deserves a chance to actually go for it one time and not just be status quo for the 30 win seasons. At what point does that not become enough and the fans, owners and players want something more. I for one am ready to live with a few down seasons if it means we took a legit Crack at it one time but that's not the way he does business.
Stewart won't be the only one not in the lineup.....Tonight will be a test for you guys. There was zero emotion in the game Wednesday, and yes I'm going to say it because many others have. Stewart was not there to bring enrgy and drag the boys along. It will be a tough rink tonight with 10000 fans. I think it will be up to Barlow to bring his team up. Although it looked to me like he has had a nagging injury by the way hes been playing. I hope he is able to play, although it wouldn't surprise me if he is hurt more than he or the team is letting on.
Good luck tonight, I'll maybe watch replay when I get home from our Remembrance Day game.
The Only real problem I have is Dale never goes all in either direction. IMO if we are going to sell we should try to sell as much as possible to help put us in the best spot for the future or if we are going to go for it do the same.. Actually go for it. Obviously not every season but atleast once in a while. If we put our selves jn a situation this season that we are not what we hoped and the season looks somewhat in trouble then just make the necesary trades. Give up your Barlow, Sedley, Guindon or Goure. All these guys will net decent returnsI don't think Dale's job is in jeopardy, nor do I think it should be. I think this is where having an experienced steady hand at the helm is a good thing. I don't expect Dale to make any irrational moves. While we all expected better this season I don't think Dale will try and push the round peg in to the square hole. He'll make the course correction that's required.
The way I look at it is if the team doesn't turn it around then you have to sell. If they tear it down they will get good picks and/or players in return for their talents. If they want to make a serious run, the next window is around the 06/07 group when George is 19. Selling now means they would have the assets necessary to be serious players in deadline dealing during that season. In theory they would be better positioned that year than they are now but between now and then you would need a couple of stars to come out of the 06/07 class and potentially 08 group. The only 05s rostered that would be back are Brennan, Waddick and Petrovski as OA candidates.
I think in general everything has to been done in consideration of ownership and with respect to the market we are in. The games I've attended this year haven't had great turnouts minus the hockey fights cancer game. Attendance figures affect gate revenue that keep the organization afloat. I'm not confident the ownership group would stomach the financial impacts of a few down seasons. We are the smallest market in the league and I think we have to do things a little differently than the rest of the league.
I don't buy the fair weather market argument, because attendance has stayed relatively steady by the looks of it even in "rebuilding" years for this club (like 2018-2019 and the year after). And it's an attitude that if the team does have at the top, has held them back tremendously.I don't think Dale's job is in jeopardy, nor do I think it should be. I think this is where having an experienced steady hand at the helm is a good thing. I don't expect Dale to make any irrational moves. While we all expected better this season I don't think Dale will try and push the round peg in to the square hole. He'll make the course correction that's required.
The way I look at it is if the team doesn't turn it around then you have to sell. If they tear it down they will get good picks and/or players in return for their talents. If they want to make a serious run, the next window is around the 06/07 group when George is 19. Selling now means they would have the assets necessary to be serious players in deadline dealing during that season. In theory they would be better positioned that year than they are now but between now and then you would need a couple of stars to come out of the 06/07 class and potentially 08 group. The only 05s rostered that would be back are Brennan, Waddick and Petrovski as OA candidates.
I think in general everything has to been done in consideration of ownership and with respect to the market we are in. The games I've attended this year haven't had great turnouts minus the hockey fights cancer game. Attendance figures affect gate revenue that keep the organization afloat. I'm not confident the ownership group would stomach the financial impacts of a few down seasons. We are the smallest market in the league and I think we have to do things a little differently than the rest of the league.
I think if it comes to it and the team sells, and strips it right down, they would be positioned well to be buyers two seasons from now and not completely deplete the cupboard. I think that's the biggest thing holding them back is not wanting to completely deplete the draft picks. With this being such a cyclical league, draft picks are really important to keep the talent flowing into the roster year over year. If they completely empty the cupboards it takes longer to build back to relevancy. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see them be a player in the market but I totally understand why they can't.The Only real problem I have is Dale never goes all in either direction. IMO if we are going to sell we should try to sell as much as possible to help put us in the best spot for the future or if we are going to go for it do the same.. Actually go for it. Obviously not every season but atleast once in a while. If we put our selves jn a situation this season that we are not what we hoped and the season looks somewhat in trouble then just make the necesary trades. Give up your Barlow, Sedley, Guindon or Goure. All these guys will net decent returns
I get it. I think the thing we have to keep in mind is the GM represents ownership and acts on their wishes. DeGray acts as the voice of the team but a lot of decisions he has to make are being done on behalf of or with the approval of the ownership group. If the ownership group says we need the playoff gate every year to sustain the franchise then the GM needs to manage accordingly. I don't know that it's entirely up to DeGray to buy big or sell big. At the end of day, the moves made directly impact the ownership group and team revenues.I don't buy the fair weather market argument, because attendance has stayed relatively steady by the looks of it even in "rebuilding" years for this club (like 2018-2019 and the year after). And it's an attitude that if the team does have at the top, has held them back tremendously.
Two seasons ago was a "build up" year, and the team got 3 home playoff dates. Last year the team wanted to be contenders and got 2 home playoff dates. This year the team wanted to be competing for the championship, and they'll be lucky to get more than 2 home dates right now.
While I agree that selling would be beneficial to go for it in the next year or two, our GM has been too timid to pull the trigger until it's too late far too many times to have faith in it.
I'm fully on the train that DeGray's time has come and I think the team would do even better if we had a GM that was willing to ride the all in nature of the OHL. Winning a couple rounds every few years and none for a couple is an improvement on the mediocrity the fans and players have been served the past number of years. Every season the owners hold on and give him this kind of leeway is a year we fall further behind the times.
If we start counting after 2011's championship run, the team has won four playoff rounds. Four. In 10 completed seasons. That's a maximum of four home playoffs games per year in 7 of those seasons. And that's with some incredible teams that could have done more.
Anyway, back to the hockey...
Barlow sitting tonight. Injury related or performance? If he's not injured that's a pretty big statement to the rest of the team. Have to think it's injury.Stewart won't be the only one not in the lineup.....
The team is lacking confidence in themselves.WTH was with the OT it felt like we spent the whole time retreating from the offensive zone in OT while in possession of the puck. Possession is great but we did literally nothing with it and it was so frustrating to watch. The longer it went on you just new London was going to score.
Their best two games recently against London .Big point for you guys, must have played well
Will be interesting to see what's in store for tonight, the league's highest PIMS vs the leagues fewest PIMS. See how they respond to Mississauga's brand of hockey.Their best two games recently against London .
Go figure