Team_Spirit
95% Elliotte
- Jul 3, 2002
- 38,885
- 20,193
Development failure my ass how they got this guy to score 25g for 4 years straight years with his 1996 dekes and shitty off ice habits is a miracle. 4-6 other teams tried and failed.
Yeah his on ice development was fine initially. Made the team D! year but that was the lockout shortened season that started in January. He was ready to leave Jr. Him and gally started together he put up 27 pts and gally 28 in a shortened season (48 games). The next year he put up 31 to gallys 41 but he missed close to 20 games to injury. year 3 final year of ELC he puts up 20G and 46 pts and gally had 47. similar development lines.Development failure my ass how they got this guy to score 25g for 4 years straight years with his 1996 dekes and shitty off ice habits is a miracle. 4-6 other teams tried and failed.
Until proven otherwise, and based on his past, the guy isn't mentally ill.
There is this thing called personnal responsability that needs to kick in.
And if you do see that you are going the wrong way, you need to take matters in your hands to correct it. Strangely, he did that after when he joined the NHLPA program. He took responsability. And address it.
So I don't agree with you that NO ONE chose who they are. Some do. Whether it's positive or negative.
No amount of development was going to overcome the toxicity that his family created.I don't think he was either of those things…he just didn't prioritize his own career.
It had nothing to do with making the Habs at 19 years old.
I mean sure the coaching staff could have done a better job of bringing him along but you guys think they didn't all know all the mess he was getting into off the ice?
He did not take his job as a professional hockey player seriously and he surrounded himself with “yes people” who enabled his behaviour.
It's 100% on him.
Ya, they had a tussle at a house party.Funny you mention Nate, because wasn't he and his dad also involved in some bar fights?
The caricature of a caricature.
Isles fan let him have it:
“Bro looks ridiculous”
“We need to discuss those socks.”
“Looks like he’s manning a table at the supermarket asking for donations for needy vets. At least get that table a skirt.”
“Billion dollar arena and they had a 2 dollar table for the press conference.”
“Why did they give him a setup that makes him look like he’s helping kids sign in for their peewee hockey tournament.”
“At least he’s ready to go clam digging after the game.”
“Wait, this can’t be a real photo. I mean, the Isles don’t even have a podium in their media room but instead a picnic folding table?”
“Thats what he should be doing, sitting and selling programs up in the corridor’s during games. The man is not well !”
The caricature of a caricature.
Isles fan let him have it:
“Bro looks ridiculous”
“We need to discuss those socks.”
“Looks like he’s manning a table at the supermarket asking for donations for needy vets. At least get that table a skirt.”
“Billion dollar arena and they had a 2 dollar table for the press conference.”
“Why did they give him a setup that makes him look like he’s helping kids sign in for their peewee hockey tournament.”
“At least he’s ready to go clam digging after the game.”
“Wait, this can’t be a real photo. I mean, the Isles don’t even have a podium in their media room but instead a picnic folding table?”
“Thats what he should be doing, sitting and selling programs up in the corridor’s during games. The man is not well !”
The caricature of a caricature.
Isles fan let him have it:
“Bro looks ridiculous”
“We need to discuss those socks.”
“Looks like he’s manning a table at the supermarket asking for donations for needy vets. At least get that table a skirt.”
“Billion dollar arena and they had a 2 dollar table for the press conference.”
“Why did they give him a setup that makes him look like he’s helping kids sign in for their peewee hockey tournament.”
“At least he’s ready to go clam digging after the game.”
“Wait, this can’t be a real photo. I mean, the Isles don’t even have a podium in their media room but instead a picnic folding table?”
“Thats what he should be doing, sitting and selling programs up in the corridor’s during games. The man is not well !”
True. Nothing wrong with the ensemble. The table on the other handSocks are fine. The table though. Ouch. Ça fait BS en tabarnac.
If that's your take on what I said, then you really don't understand what I'm talking about.
Personal responsibility is not some magical automatic behavioral component. It's bred through empathic development and learned values. If someone is not raised properly, through attachment relationships that create our emotional empathy and neither receives cues to the proper values that lead to personal responsibility, that person will be clueless about it or quite simply will not give a rat's ass.
That's a narrative based on an assumption. His agent probably advised him to do so. It probably had nothing to do with taking responsibility per se, but much more likely it was simply actions that were meant to rehabilitate/save his NHL career.
This is completely bonkers. Your arguments have nothing to do with the relevant facts that try to explain where choice comes from. I have to repeat myself often about this, but whatever, here it goes, again: you do not chose your genes, you do not chose your epigenetic markings whether inherited or acquired, you do not chose your parents nor do you chose your formative bio-psycho-social environment, you do not chose the city, state/province and country you are born in, you do not chose what you like or dislike, you do not chose who you fall in love with.
Pretty much everything that makes us who we are is almost entirely out of our control. By the time the actual volative part of us starts evolving, almost at the end of our teens, we've already been imprinted by the gazillion environmental cues that have rattled in our minds and created what we like or dislike. Our attractions and aversions.
The deck is literally stacked against our limited volition.
Furthermore, if you really want a bit more insight on his predicament; we can easily infer that Alex Galchenyuk is impulsive. He has a history of addiction. Those are two big telltale signs of childhood stress/trauma. Impulsivity comes from childhood, but lack of impulse control in adulthood is more related to our late teen years when that significant part of the brain starts to bloom and does so until our late twenties.
The fact he's having more problems as a full grown adult is a sign that the development of his impulse control was partly, or even greatly, staunted.
You say he's not mentally ill, yet his behavior could certainly be categorized as anti social tendencies. All the earmarks are there. Aggressiveness, impulsivity and substance abuse.
How would you have handled Galchenyuk's development given what's known, and what would you have tried to find out to fill in the blanks?
Shame he had to go to that shitweasel organization.Connor Bedard is having quite a night against Tampa. 2g 1a so far
Shame he had to go to that shitweasel organization.
Several teams rumoured to be talking to Patrick Kane. Chris Johnston believes they include Rangers, Buffalo, Detroit & Florida. Apparently, he had the same surgery as Nick Backstrom so will be interesting to see if he is able to come back.
How would you have handled Galchenyuk's development given what's known, and what would you have tried to find out to fill in the blanks?
Until proven otherwise, and based on his past, the guy isn't mentally ill. There is this thing called personnal responsability that needs to kick in. And if you do see that you are going the wrong way, you need to take matters in your hands to correct it. Strangely, he did that after when he joined the NHLPA program. He took responsability. And address it. So I don't agree with you that NO ONE chose who they are. Some do. Whether it's positive or negative.