HF Habs: Out of Town Thread: Off-Season Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

DavePeak

Lane Hutson will win the Calder, Norris and Vezina
Jul 15, 2009
3,052
4,540
Montreal


Fedotov has been *signed* to a 2 year contract in KHL. The KHL had been refusing to allow this contract to register previously because Fedotov has a legitimate NHL contract for next season with Philadelphia Flyers.

The KHL was recognizing that Philadelphia had a legal contract with Fedotov and refused CSKA's extension of him - initially.

They have reversed course, and have allowed the extension to go through.

Bill Daly has already commented that the extension is in violation of his contract with Philadelphia.

We'll see what happens here. The NHL & KHL had an understanding that each would respect the other's contracts. This challenges that agreement.

If a player can get himself out of Russia, NHL may no longer recognize KHL contracts.

4d chess move by Brière to get the NHL-KHL agreement canceled and have Michkov with the Flyers next season? :sarcasm:
 

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
54,889
69,114
Toronto
4d chess move by Brière to get the NHL-KHL agreement canceled and have Michkov with the Flyers next season? :sarcasm:

He won't. Russians have to do military service. There's ways to get out of it legitimately (like going to university which Michkov is doing). He has to complete those requirements before coming over, or else he risks becoming another Fedotov.

It's more for players who have contracts and have also completed those requirements like Carolina's prospect Nikishin or even Montreal's just recently drafted player Konyushkov, who just signed a three year extension while still having a year left on his contract (so 4 years).

Normally, he wouldn't be able to come over for 4 years due to that contract, but maybe he comes over in 2 if NHL decides not to recognize KHL contracts due to this.

It's a contract that was forced on Fedotov too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapala and DavePeak

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
90,651
39,507
Who was this guy one day who hit a veteran during a camp and was pratically fired on the spot and it took time for him to comeback from this...

Anyway, it's one thing to be remembered....but there's a limit.
 

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,887
25,467


Fedotov has been *signed* to a 2 year contract in KHL. The KHL had been refusing to allow this contract to register previously because Fedotov has a legitimate NHL contract for next season with Philadelphia Flyers.

The KHL was recognizing that Philadelphia had a legal contract with Fedotov and refused CSKA's extension of him - initially.

They have reversed course, and have allowed the extension to go through.

Bill Daly has already commented that the extension is in violation of his contract with Philadelphia.

We'll see what happens here. The NHL & KHL had an understanding that each would respect the other's contracts. This challenges that agreement.

If a player can get himself out of Russia, NHL may no longer recognize KHL contracts.


Lol, what an unforseeable turn in the Fedotov saga.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,025
12,369
Lol, what an unforseeable turn in the Fedotov saga.
There's so much 'fog' between the KHL and NHL and it seems very few reporters are interested enough to actually look into the topics at hand.

Like when some bozos insisted that Russia or its president held Kaprizov back last summer when the reality was that the US Gov did not renew Kaprizov's visa on time and restricted consular services in Russia, thereby requiring Kaprizov to apply through a consulate in the Mid East. To this day some commentators insist otherwise.

I don't know the story of Fedetov but there is an opportunity for the NHL and KHL to demonstrate that a full, permanent divorce between their respective leagues is not good for anybody. I hope they come to terms and the IIHF plays a positive role.
 

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,887
25,467
There's so much 'fog' between the KHL and NHL and it seems very few reporters are interested enough to actually look into the topics at hand.

Like when some bozos insisted that Russia or its president held Kaprizov back last summer when the reality was that the US Gov did not renew Kaprizov's visa on time and restricted consular services in Russia, thereby requiring Kaprizov to apply through a consulate in the Mid East. To this day some commentators insist otherwise.

I don't know the story of Fedetov but there is an opportunity for the NHL and KHL to demonstrate that a full, permanent divorce between their respective leagues is not good for anybody. I hope they come to terms and the IIHF plays a positive role.

Yeah you're right, we need an objective and neutral mediator like René Fasel on the case.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,025
12,369
Yeah you're right, we need an objective and neutral mediator like René Fasel on the case.
The Player Transfer Agreement Fasel oversaw hurt all the Euro leagues in a major way. They did not get adequate compensation for their valuable player-assets -- that's partially why these leagues don't care about developing young talents for the NHL, their compensation is peanuts. How much do you know about the Malkin case?

The IIHF is a very poorly run organization in any case.
 

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,887
25,467
The Player Transfer Agreement Fasel oversaw hurt all the Euro leagues in a major way. They did not get adequate compensation for their valuable player-assets -- that's partially why these leagues don't care about developing young talents for the NHL, their compensation is peanuts. How much do you know about the Malkin case?

The IIHF is a very poorly run organization in any case.

You're right, René Fasel isn't pro Russia enough for us to get a fair settlement. The only fair mediator I can think of at this point is probably Roman Rotenberg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,025
12,369
You're right, René Fasel isn't pro Russia enough for us to get a fair settlement. The only fair mediator I can think of at this point is probably Roman Rotenberg.
How much do you know about the Malkin case?

It has nothing to do with Russia -- the sport would benefit from a fair PTA between the leagues.

From 2006:
"We've put so much effort, resources and money into Malkin's
development as a player. He was our gold diamond, our prize
possession. He had a contract with us, we were building the
whole team around him and now he is gone," Velichkin said.

"But don't think we'll just sit there and do nothing. We'll
go to court to get what we believe is proper compensation."

Under the transfer deal Magnitogorsk would have received a
basic $200,000 fee for Malkin while Metallurg reportedly wanted
at least 10 times more.

Velichkin declined to specify the sum he was seeking for
Malkin, pointing to similar deals involving soccer players.

"In soccer, a fee for a player of Malkin's caliber would be
into tens of millions of dollars," he said. "He is a franchise
player and we won't be satisfied with anything less."
2.0M USD would've been fair for one of the best prospect of all time, 0.2M USD is a slap in the face. Because the American courts and IIHF sided with the NHL in this case, European leagues (not just Russian) had very little incentive to develop NHL talents. That's why you get caveats about how these leagues are not feeder leagues or development leagues... their profit motive with player development has been smashed to bits and limited to a measly 200,000K USD.


Very plainly the IIHF dropped the ball.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: NotProkofievian

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,887
25,467
How much do you know about the Malkin case?

It has nothing to do with Russia -- the sport would benefit from a fair PTA between the leagues.

The NHL's players? No. Our players.

I don't think much would change, and I don't think negotiations with the KHL on a PTA would be fruitful. The best players go to the best league, and the rest go to the rest. What's interesting about the current arrangement is that there's any compensation at all.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,025
12,369
The NHL's players? No. Our players.

I don't think much would change, and I don't think negotiations with the KHL on a PTA would be fruitful. The best players go to the best league, and the rest go to the rest. What's interesting about the current arrangement is that there's any compensation at all.
If there is a will there is a way, and negotiations and agreements are always better than inextricable conflict (ahem...). The problem is the IIHF is smaller than the NHL and holds no leverage -- if they suspend the involvement of Hockey Canada, USA Hockey, or the NHL in their tournaments the leadership of those organizations would probably shrug it off.

If there is no PTA, players can sign multiple contracts with multiple teams and jump between them. That's chaos and will hurt the NHL's vice-grip on rookies and RFAs. Only the very best prospects would bet that they can earn more than 0.8m/year after their 3-year rookie contract. Players at around the 1-1.5m mark will have options abroad, giving them leverage over their rights-holding clubs in the NHL. Players sent down to the AHL would jump over to Europe in a moment. No professional sport would tolerate this sort of contract mayhem, it would look terrible.

If there is a PTA, where all leagues respect each other's contracts, it give clear boundaries to players and allow for better and more professional roster planning. Compensation is in question now -- a fixed fee is nonsense. If a player's contract rights are under control, the rights holder has the right to set the price to sell it. That's how it works in nearly all European professional sports leagues. I'd be for allowed a player buy-out option too, and NHL teams should be allowed to pay for it and have it count against the salary cap.

At the same time the IIHF has a lot to do to grow the sport's commercial viability in Europe and elsewhere -- so to grow the sport. It's not the NHL's job to grow the sport, it's the IIHF's and they've done an awful job at it. But I digress.
 

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,887
25,467
If there is a will there is a way, and negotiations and agreements are always better than inextricable conflict (ahem...). The problem is the IIHF is smaller than the NHL and holds no leverage -- if they suspend the involvement of Hockey Canada, USA Hockey, or the NHL in their tournaments the leadership of those organizations would probably shrug it off.

If there is no PTA, players can sign multiple contracts with multiple teams and jump between them. That's chaos and will hurt the NHL's vice-grip on rookies and RFAs. Only the very best prospects would bet that they can earn more than 0.8m/year after their 3-year rookie contract. Players at around the 1-1.5m mark will have options abroad, giving them leverage over their rights-holding clubs in the NHL. Players sent down to the AHL would jump over to Europe in a moment. No professional sport would tolerate this sort of contract mayhem, it would look terrible.

If there is a PTA, where all leagues respect each other's contracts, it give clear boundaries to players and allow for better and more professional roster planning. Compensation is in question now -- a fixed fee is nonsense. If a player's contract rights are under control, the rights holder has the right to set the price to sell it. That's how it works in nearly all European professional sports leagues. I'd be for allowed a player buy-out option too, and NHL teams should be allowed to pay for it and have it count against the salary cap.

At the same time the IIHF has a lot to do to grow the sport's commercial viability in Europe and elsewhere -- so to grow the sport. It's not the NHL's job to grow the sport, it's the IIHF's and they've done an awful job at it. But I digress.

Sorry, not interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino

Archijerej

Registered User
Jan 17, 2005
8,565
8,214
Poland

Attachments

  • DWpAgsOWAAA8QHB.jpg
    DWpAgsOWAAA8QHB.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 2

waffledave

waffledave, from hf
Aug 22, 2004
33,738
16,669
Montreal
Surprising, but apparently Michkov didn't want to play in Washington (and less surprisingly, in Arizona). I guess what Nikolishin said about the disrespect might have been true. Really weird predraft stuff around MM, it sounds a bit like Jagr back decades ago.


This is a total guess but based on the reports about how Michkov didn't seem to like questions about his defensive play in the interviews, was shaking his head/scoffing, I suspect he chose Philly because they didn't ask him about it. Briere doesn't care about playing defensively.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad