Riggins
Registered User
Detroit is still going to be trash, zero chance at making the playoffs. I'm just glad now they likely won't compete with us for last in the division. They're gunning for mediocrity for the next decade.
This will be us too next summer likelyDetroit is still going to be trash, zero chance at making the playoffs. I'm just glad now they likely won't compete with us for last in the division. They're gunning for mediocrity for the next decade.
Okay why can’t the Habs acquire “not premium” 40g scorers if they’re so hell bent on being competitive and having a good culture?Yes because he is NOT a premium player.
They’re both deployed in all situations, they’re both on crappy rosters, they’re both defacto not dejure 1Cs… but Suzuki has never hit 70pts and Larkin has twice. I think saying Larkin has a slight edge in overall ability at this moment in time isn’t such a controversial statement. Want to take it to the general board and poll? I’m actually curious now.He is slightly older not slightly better. I don't get why we assume Suzuki has peaked? He still has a number of seasons to go with hopefully a stronger team and cast of characters before he will reach his apex. His stats are very much in line with Larkin's first four seasons plus he has some post season pedigree Larkin does not have.
You either think Ottawa got a good deal and small wingers have little value or that ottawa got fleeced and small wingers can actually have value. You can't have both friend.No Dorion got fooled by thinking that he could sign an American UFA long term. It's hard to pull off for any Canadian team.
That doesn't change what I said though. Small wingers have little value.
You either think Ottawa got a good deal and small wingers have little value or that ottawa got fleeced and small wingers can actually have value. You can't have both friend.
Larkin hit 70 points in his later years maybe we shoud let Suzuki play out those years too? Like I said their first 4 seasons are a dead heat.Okay why can’t the Habs acquire “not premium” 40g scorers if they’re so hell bent on being competitive and having a good culture?
They’re both deployed in all situations, they’re both on crappy rosters, they’re both defacto not dejure 1Cs… but Suzuki has never hit 70pts and Larkin has twice. I think saying Larkin has a slight edge in overall ability at this moment in time isn’t such a controversial statement. Want to take it to the general board and poll? I’m actually curious now.
I agree with this but I'm not so sure he's executed it properly, haven't liked many of their free agent signings.Larkin is slightly better than Suzuki, imo. He’s been on some real crap teams too, don’t forget.
Detroit is well run — they’re not doing “drafting and development” OR “competing with the league” OR “instituting a winning culture”. They’re trying to do all three because they all feed into each other (ie it’s better for a young player’s development to happen in a winning environment).
Yzerman said his plan clearly and plainly: he signed those players this summer to get this team to the next level. He can deal them away when better young players come in or hold onto them as he sees fit.
And now he’s acquired a premium player from a divisional rival. Wild how some teams manage to do that.
desperation.How is it possible that DeBrincat got traded in the division?
;-)
What about it doesn't make sense?This makes no sense at all.
LA is paying the prima donna almost $135,000 per point based on last year's numbers. So, Nylander should be asking for roughly $11.75 million but settle for $10mil. as a favour and discount for the LaffsYou have a great point there. PLD has potential, and I was willing to pay for that. But what do guys regularly scoring 80 plus points or at least at that pace earn?
Nylander based on PLD's contract should be aiming for minimum 9.5.
Matthews will be bending that team over with a 14 mil per contract.
Different situations, Sens had no leverageDetroit paid almost the same price as the Habs paid for Newhook.
1st (31st), and conditional 1st are close.
Habs 2nd, 37th is better than Kubalik.
Fairbrother and Sebrango are pretty much similar.
4th - nothing.
I don’t know why this has to be an argument. That’s fine if you are certain that Suzuki will surpass him in the future but as of this very moment it isn’t controversial to think Larkin has the edge.Larkin hit 70 points in his later years maybe we shoud let Suzuki play out those years too? Like I said their first 4 seasons are a dead heat.
Well we don’t know until it plays out but it seems like he is certain he won’t be affected by the cap commitments they have. They’ve signed high-character players as far as I can tell so it’s easy to take Yzerman as this word: he wants a winning culture until the youngsters take the reigns.I agree with this but I'm not so sure he's executed it properly, haven't liked many of their free agent signings.
Hughes should in the future make deals with teams that have no leverage rather than teams that fleece him.Different situations, Sens had no leverage
DeBrindcat was open to multiple teams — this was widely reported.See that's the difference between this and the Dubois case. DeBrincat only wanted to go to Detroit and it got done. If Dubois really wanted to go to Montreal, it would have been done just like this.
DeBrindcat was open to multiple teams — this was widely reported.
The Habs didn’t get to the point to make an offer for PLD because they didn’t offer the best deal to acquire him. If Hughes wanted to acquire PLD, we would’ve had him as a Hab.
Incredible stuff from Yzerman.
Intra-division trade to acquire a premium player. None of the pieces sent out are going to be missed by DET. Wow! Just today I was told these trades don’t happen…
@Saundies what’s your take? Another trade which we shouldn’t count as evidence that teams can acquire premium players?
Same as @Boss Man Hughes . Pretty simple.Yes because he is NOT a premium player.
Yeah we’ll see with those signings but I definitely rate the approach of not putting all your eggs in the drafting/tanking philosophyWell we don’t know until it plays out but it seems like he is certain he won’t be affected by the cap commitments they have. They’ve signed high-character players as far as I can tell so it’s easy to take Yzerman as this word: he wants a winning culture until the youngsters take the reigns.
That's not always going to be possible, I don't mind making bold moves, they just better pay off.Hughes should in the future make deals with teams that have no leverage rather than teams that fleece him.
I heard DeBrincat only wanted to go to Detroit. if he was open to several teams the return should have been more unless they weren't willing to meet his contract demands.I don’t know why this has to be an argument. That’s fine if you are certain that Suzuki will surpass him in the future but as of this very moment it isn’t controversial to think Larkin has the edge.
Well we don’t know until it plays out but it seems like he is certain he won’t be affected by the cap commitments they have. They’ve signed high-character players as far as I can tell so it’s easy to take Yzerman as this word: he wants a winning culture until the youngsters take the reigns.
It’s a more aggressive, more forward approach than what the Habs have. But to be fair to Hughes, Yzerman has been at it for longer and also has a huge stud in Seider and we have no such player on the NHL roster yet.
Hughes should in the future make deals with teams that have no leverage rather than teams that fleece him.
DeBrindcat was open to multiple teams — this was widely reported.
The Habs didn’t get to the point to make an offer for PLD because they didn’t offer the best deal to acquire him. If Hughes wanted to acquire PLD, we would’ve had him as a Hab.
He did. From this clip of Bruce Garrioch on TSN. He's a really well connected reporter in Ottawa for the Sens.I heard DeBrincat only wanted to go to Detroit. if he was open to several teams the return should have been more unless they weren't willing to meet his contract demands.
I don't think so. Dorion said he said wanted to go to Detroit and he was traded there. Pretty simple, really. Stop trying to contradict things just to win an argument.
Same as @Boss Man Hughes . Pretty simple.
Plus he demanded to only go to one team and played hardball with the Sens. Pretty easy to try to win arguments when you leave all the context out, though, eh? I forget, when did Eichel only want to be traded here and force the Sabres to only negotiate with us? Must have missed that news report when it was happening.
I heard DeBrincat only wanted to go to Detroit. if he was open to several teams the return should have been more unless they weren't willing to meet his contract demands.
He did. From this clip of Bruce Garrioch on TSN. He's a really well connected reporter in Ottawa for the Sens.
Interviewer: Bruce, how did the DeBrincat deal finally come together?
Garrioch: Well I think in the end, Adam, Alex DeBrincat wasn't really willing to go anywhere else. He wanted to go to Detroit all along and he was focused on that with his agent Jeff Jackson. The Senators tried to talk to the Anaheim Ducks and the New York Islanders about deals, but they wanted to sign him to an 8 year contract extension. He didn't want to sign in any of those places because essentially, he wanted to go to the motor city and he was willing to take less money to go there as we saw.
Rebuilds take time. And sometimes you strike out on a top pick like Zedina and it extends the rebuild. Too early to judge Yzerman’s GM tenure in Detroit. It’s a marathon not a sprint.
4 seasons so far? I wouldn't say it's early but yeah, it does take time. I'm pretty sure around the 4/5 year mark, Bergevin frustration kicked in on his inability to get us over the hump. So I guess Yzerman gets the slack in Detroit but in Montreal, it's less patience. It will happen to Gorton/Hughes if we are in the Wings spot after 4 years.
Still a fan of Yzerman. All I was saying is I wonder how long it will take. Didn't say it was a sprint.
MB walked into a golden situation with two superstars and a young sniper entering their prime. He had Markov returning and a top three pick.4 seasons so far? I wouldn't say it's early but yeah, it does take time. I'm pretty sure around the 4/5 year mark, Bergevin frustration kicked in on his inability to get us over the hump. So I guess Yzerman gets the slack in Detroit but in Montreal, it's less patience. It will happen to Gorton/Hughes if we are in the Wings spot after 4 years.
Still a fan of Yzerman. All I was saying is I wonder how long it will take. Didn't say it was a sprint.