the valiant effort
settle down, bud
- Apr 17, 2017
- 4,815
- 5,851
Know who else sucks (despite having plenty of talent available)? Foo Fighters.
The problem is the singer is talented at drums and nothing else.Know who else sucks (despite having plenty of talent available)? Foo Fighters.
Yeah that's my point, they don't suck. They are very good at what they are.
Know who else sucks (despite having plenty of talent available)? Foo Fighters.
Yeah, you don't like them. Doesn't mean they suck. It's not the same thing.But i think spam sucks, so for me, so does Nickelback.
If i don't like them it's because i think their music sucks.Yeah, you don't like them. Doesn't mean they suck. It's not the same thing.
I think commercial success is a pretty fair metric for deciding if a band objectively sucks. If millions are buying the albums and they top the charts I just don't see how you can say they suck. You can say you don't like them, you can't say they objectively suck.If i don't like them it's because i think their music sucks.
What's actually happening here is you are deciding for others. Or trying to define "suckage" to your own bias.
Thinking something sucks is an opinion and you're not gonna define for others what sucks or not.
Gene Simmons burner account.I think commercial success is a pretty fair metric for deciding if a band objectively sucks. If millions are buying the albums and they top the charts I just don't see how you can say they suck. You can say you don't like them, you can't say they objectively suck.
... Of course, that had to be the line, hahah!I mean people can hate on Nickleback all they want, but they obviously have a LOT of fans:
I guess this is how I remind you that Nickelback is one of the most commercially successful Canadian rock bands, (...)
I think commercial success is a pretty fair metric for deciding if a band objectively sucks. If millions are buying the albums and they top the charts I just don't see how you can say they suck. You can say you don't like them, you can't say they objectively suck.
Sorry, your bipolar posting about the Habs and usual obsession with the Leafs is much more entertaining.All this music talk, it seems its 690 dumb afternoon Mitchy show....
I think commercial success doesn't define any art's relevance or beauty. Using the word objectivity when speaking about art tells me you don't indulge in creating art. The words belong in opposite worlds.
Nickelback sucks. Deal with it, cuz it's pretty much guaranteed you'll cross paths daily with people who think they suck.
I used to think STP were rip-off artists of PJ but it’s not the case. Go listen to Mighty Joe Young (their name before STP) he was singling like that long before PJ was big.I'll never stop giving cred to PJ. They were mavericks, trend setters and never sold out. All that came after them were just pale imitations. Bush, STP, Creed, Nickleback. Copy of a copy of a copy...
One of the most insane endings to a game that I can remember. Ducks will be very good very soon.Penguins, about two mins left to play, get a lengthened five on three that stretches until almost the end of the game.
They found a way to lose in regulation by SHG. Unbelievable.
Know who else sucks (despite having plenty of talent available)? Foo Fighters.
You know, the typical Erik KarlssonPenguins, about two mins left to play, get a lengthened five on three that stretches until almost the end of the game.
They found a way to lose in regulation by SHG. Unbelievable.