OT: Other Chicago & General Sports Thread XXVII: Baez Time!

Status
Not open for further replies.

clydesdale line

Connor BeJesus
Jan 10, 2012
25,447
24,129
Kershaw is the best in the MLB and it isn't close. Same with Felix in the AL.

It is close actually. Sale has a legit case though considering he doesn't face pitchers hitting three/four times a game and pitching in a pitcher's park. If he didn't get injured earlier, he and Felix would be neck and neck for the AL Cy. I still give the nod to Kershaw though. As cold steel said, he's done it longer plus he has the numbers (FIP, xFIP, SIERA, etc.) backing him up. Sale has had such a ridiculous year though. All are close, just amazing pitchers. I'll give Wainwright some love too.
 
Last edited:

Slopo

Registered User
Nov 3, 2011
2,035
0
Kershaw is the best in the MLB and it isn't close. Same with Felix in the AL.

Hernandez: 11-2, 1.99 ERA, 0.89 WHIP, .197 BAA, 173 Ks, 29 BBs, 158.1 IP
Sale: 10-1, 1.88 ERA, 0.86 WHIP, .194 BAA, 122 Ks, 19 BBs, 110 IP

Of course, Sale was injured and Hernandez has produced similar numbers with 50 more IP. Hernandez also has a higher K-to-BB ratio.
 

ColdSteel2

Registered User
Aug 27, 2010
34,759
3,578
Hernandez: 11-2, 1.99 ERA, 0.89 WHIP, .197 BAA, 173 Ks, 29 BBs, 158.1 IP
Sale: 10-1, 1.88 ERA, 0.86 WHIP, .194 BAA, 122 Ks, 19 BBs, 110 IP

Of course, Sale was injured and Hernandez has produced similar numbers with 50 more IP. Hernandez also has a higher K-to-BB ratio.

Where do you draw the line? WHIP trumps everything as far as I am concerned. Yeah, health is factor too. I just have a hard time taking away from a better season I think will continue.
 

madgoat33

Registered User
May 16, 2010
17,792
2,002
Hernandez: 11-2, 1.99 ERA, 0.89 WHIP, .197 BAA, 173 Ks, 29 BBs, 158.1 IP
Sale: 10-1, 1.88 ERA, 0.86 WHIP, .194 BAA, 122 Ks, 19 BBs, 110 IP

Of course, Sale was injured and Hernandez has produced similar numbers with 50 more IP. Hernandez also has a higher K-to-BB ratio.

Actually sales k:bb ratio is higher...
 

IU Hawks fan

They call me IU
Dec 30, 2008
28,859
3,149
NW Burbs
Here's how even they are.

Felix is at 5.5 fWAR in 158 1/3 innings pitched, Sale is 3.9 in 110.

Do the math, that puts Felix at 0.0347 per IP, and Sale at 0.03545.
 

madgoat33

Registered User
May 16, 2010
17,792
2,002
baseballreference>fangraphs.

Also, using war per start would be better since going deeper per start is better, if sale had the same amount of starts(i know he doesn't, just for argument's sake) then using WAR per inning would be super flawed.
 

Kurtosis

GHG
May 26, 2010
25,462
4,195
The Village Within the City
baseballreference>fangraphs.

Also, using war per start would be better since going deeper per start is better, if sale had the same amount of starts(i know he doesn't, just for argument's sake) then using WAR per inning would be super flawed.

I think a lot of people would argue the opposite from what I have read. I would be interested to hear your take.
 

madgoat33

Registered User
May 16, 2010
17,792
2,002
I think a lot of people would argue the opposite from what I have read. I would be interested to hear your take.

As far as fangraphs vs baseball reference? Or about the WAR per inning vs WAR per start?

If its the former than I was really just kidding. I don't really have a preference as long as comparisons are made using the same site(i think that's obvious though). If its the latter, then I'd be interested to hear why people think WAR per inning makes more sense comparing pitchers.
 

MurrayBannerman

I post about baseball on a hockey forum
Feb 18, 2012
34,493
659
CHI
Here's how even they are.

Felix is at 5.5 fWAR in 158 1/3 innings pitched, Sale is 3.9 in 110.

Do the math, that puts Felix at 0.0347 per IP, and Sale at 0.03545.

That's not hpw WAR is evaluated... Some of the inputs are already divided by IP.
 

IU Hawks fan

They call me IU
Dec 30, 2008
28,859
3,149
NW Burbs
That's not hpw WAR is evaluated... Some of the inputs are already divided by IP.

I don't even get how that's possible. It's a cumulative stat, so that really doesn't make any sense to me.

Fact is, they have nearly identical numbers, but 1 guy has pitched way more so his is significantly higher.
 

DisgruntledHawkFan

Blackhawk Down
Jun 19, 2004
58,711
30,284
South Side
The rage that came when the Cubs traded Ryan Theriot was insane. I also remember people being disappointed when we lost/moved Todd Walker, Mark Grudzielanek and Mark DeRosa. Chicago loves its white middle infielders.
 

DisgruntledHawkFan

Blackhawk Down
Jun 19, 2004
58,711
30,284
South Side
I missed Campana because that team was LOLful and he was at least something to watch.

DeRosa being moved to bring in Milton Bradley was the beginning of the end for this team.
 

AmericanDream

Thank you Elon!
Oct 24, 2005
37,513
27,058
Chicago Manitoba
The rage that came when the Cubs traded Ryan Theriot was insane. I also remember people being disappointed when we lost/moved Todd Walker, Mark Grudzielanek and Mark DeRosa. Chicago loves its white middle infielders.

I literally stopped watching the Cubs the day they traded DeRosa away...that one to this day still leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
 

MurrayBannerman

I post about baseball on a hockey forum
Feb 18, 2012
34,493
659
CHI
I don't even get how that's possible. It's a cumulative stat, so that really doesn't make any sense to me.

Fact is, they have nearly identical numbers, but 1 guy has pitched way more so his is significantly higher.

They take FIP, which is divided by IP, and adjust it to league average and park. You can't then divide it by inning again. It's nonsensical.

You have to look at the inputs. Yea, Sale is fantastic and that will be clearly evident. But what's also evident is how ridiculously good Kerhsaw is, despite less innings pitched.

And why those IP matter relate to the opportunities faced. Those averages, especially Sale's extremely high LOB% tend to trend downward. Felix already went through that and is still on track for a 7+ WAR season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad