Confirmed with Link: Oliver Kapanen loaned to Timrå IK in the SHL

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,115
155,622
Max Jones 2024-25 Edition

"I haven't seen anything in Jones that makes me think he should be on the roster at all. He isn't even a physical force. He just takes dumb penalties."

"Gotta feel for the guy. I had high hopes for his role but didn't see that fast hard hockey i was expecting come to think of it, only play i really remember from him is when he accidentally slashed the ref"

"A great day in Bruins Land. What a waste of money."

"Don’t know if injury got him or what. But he hasn’t shown anything to even be on an NHL roster early this season. If only we had got the guy I was familiar with. He would have been a fan favourite.

"Exactly how I feel. I like(d) the player a lot and thought he would be a great bottom six add for the team that was lacking grit and physicality. He's been terrible. I know he was hurt in camp (always the problem with him) and maybe never really got going and could still be hurt in some way. Best if he goes to Providence and tries to pull it together."

"I fully admit I thought Max Jones would be more impactful than he was. Which is sad because any sort of impact would have been better than he was."
Max Jones, Mac Jones — what’s in a name? Phonetically, they’re close enough to have been nothing more than a fail in Boston. 💀
 

MrNasty

Registered User
Jun 13, 2007
3,817
2,021
Nova Scotia
Do you think the Habs have done a good job developing prospects the last 10 years?

Timmins said he felt they made a mistake when they brought Collberg over for camp because when he went back, he lost his spot in the lineup. But then they repeated the same mistake with Norlinder, who I kept saying should stay in the SHL another year. Yet he bounced around until he finally went back home.

Whatever anyone's opinions are, the only thing that matters is results in the end. Everyone makes mistakes, but with drafting, development, the more mistakes you make, the worse things end up. Everyone should just want what's best for the future of the Habs and no one really knows what that is so I don't get why people get defensive over anyone having a opinion pointing out a possible mistake.
You are reaching here. The examples you are sharing are both old and not necessarily relevant. Not all players become the gem we all wish them to be and it’s not always because of ‘development’. Maybe the Collberg example is because Collberg didn’t deserve a better spot in the lineup. Norlinder had plenty of time to prove himself. There is absolutely nothing wrong with giving Kapanen some NHL games and then returning him to Timra. He proved he is a capable NHL player at an already young age and will further work on his game there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaP

Maitz

Registered User
Aug 3, 2006
3,507
2,345
Montreal
1M$. 2 years. But nope...that's too much. Small price to pay when you bring up Condotta, affecting Laval and not getting better too. And Jones fit the bill of the speed and toughness we needed.

But hey....i mean everything is going fine so who are we to judge....lol


condotta is already a proven bottom 6 in the nhL? When did that happen?
I think they are too close from the 50 contracts and they don't want to add more with all the prospect coming up eventually
 

Don D

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
453
561
Max Jones, Mac Jones — what’s in a name? Phonetically, they’re close enough to have been nothing more than a fail in Boston. 💀
Let us not forget Mack Jones:
1730931765638.png
 

CharleyHorse

Registered User
Sep 28, 2022
478
581
Are we in the mix now?
No. HuGo made a mistake hinting they’d be “in the mix.” Last year’s training camp showed how the media clutched their pearls when HuGo wouldn’t even mention the “P” word. So I get why they felt the need in the season’s postmortem to say they’d aim for it, but they’re not even just a little bit close to being in the mix. They probably knew it too, but to appease the media (that would be you, among others, Ray-Jean, whiner par excellence) and fans (who, let’s be honest, aren’t as sharp as they once were), they dun tole everyone that anyways. You can't be at the end of a rebuild only 2.5 years after your new coach takes the helm, and one of your star players returns from injury after missing the entire year of development.
 

Yasuo

Registered User
Sep 7, 2016
1,330
1,106
I don't know, man. I still think it's too early to tell.

I look around the league and there isn't one standardized development plan for all prospects. All teams have some that make the roster and some that cook in the ahl.

I can see an argument for guys like Arber, Struble, Barron to cook. But then guys like Guhle, Hutson, Slaf....it's very common for this calibre of player to play at the nhl level.

I think we just have to have reasonable expectations. We've made like 30 picks in the last 3 years. We're lucky if 5-6 make it on the club. The vast majority will bust regardless of the dev method. I sometimes feel like there is a legit expectation on this board that all 1st and 2nd round picks should be nhlers when that is just not going to happen.

Every prospects is playing against the odds.

Sorry for the tangent.
We should have high expectation from our first round pick we are a bottom feeder. We have been drafting top 5 from 2022 to now and i dont think i will change this year. I agree with mid to late first and later round.
 

MasterD

Giggidy Giggidy Goo
Jul 1, 2004
5,932
5,398
No. HuGo made a mistake hinting they’d be “in the mix.” Last year’s training camp showed how the media clutched their pearls when HuGo wouldn’t even mention the “P” word. So I get why they felt the need in the season’s postmortem to say they’d aim for it, but they’re not even just a little bit close to being in the mix. They probably knew it too, but to appease the media (that would be you, among others, Ray-Jean, whiner par excellence) and fans (who, let’s be honest, aren’t as sharp as they once were), they dun tole everyone that anyways. You can't be at the end of a rebuild only 2.5 years after your new coach takes the helm, and one of your star players returns from injury after missing the entire year of development.
Let's be fair, no way HuGo planned for this year to go the way it's going. No one did.

They brought in Laine, who even on bad years has a history of being close to PPG.
Montambeault was WAY, WAY better last year.
Primeau was not great, but much better than he is now.
Armia played better than now after going to Laval
Suzuki seems lost out there
Dach is playing worse than anyone ever imaged he would, despite knowing it'd take time to come back to 100%

We all knew we'd be bad, but no one thought we'd be THIS bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahad

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,115
155,622
Let us not forget Mack Jones:
View attachment 927149
Oh, I just chose to omit him as he didn’t play for the Red Sox.

However, if I were to have mentioned him, I would have brought up his first day ever as an Expo in 1969, when he had a particularly great day at the plate. He was not only dubbed the Mayor of Jonesville but it being Montreal, this happened:

“When I got back to the hotel, I had something like 150 phone calls from the hour of 12:00 to 6:00 the next morning,” recalled Jones. “And it was all females. I think I got the record for that.” ✨✨✨
 
  • Like
Reactions: Don D

rahad

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
1,945
2,359
montreal
Likely he stayed extra time because of injuries but definitely perplexing since he was three weeks away from being able to go to Laval. Wonder if rhp is close and that's why this timing.
I has sure they would keep him until December and send him to Laval.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,779
44,340
www.youtube.com
I don't know, man. I still think it's too early to tell.

I look around the league and there isn't one standardized development plan for all prospects. All teams have some that make the roster and some that cook in the ahl.

I can see an argument for guys like Arber, Struble, Barron to cook. But then guys like Guhle, Hutson, Slaf....it's very common for this calibre of player to play at the nhl level.

I think we just have to have reasonable expectations. We've made like 30 picks in the last 3 years. We're lucky if 5-6 make it on the club. The vast majority will bust regardless of the dev method. I sometimes feel like there is a legit expectation on this board that all 1st and 2nd round picks should be nhlers when that is just not going to happen.

Every prospects is playing against the odds.

Sorry for the tangent.

I didn't say it was too early to tell but it's not too early to be concerned imo.

No one should ever say there is one tried and true way to develop, but how many times of repeating the same things and it not working out before you think maybe try not rushing them?

If you can get 2 NHLers out a normal draft year (not like when you say had 5 top 40 picks) then that's a win, most prospects don't make it, the stats on success rate per round outside the 1st is flat out terrible. It's why I started my youtube channel so fans could see not just the highlights but the things they need to work on. I just point out what I see, that's it.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,779
44,340
www.youtube.com
You are reaching here. The examples you are sharing are both old and not necessarily relevant. Not all players become the gem we all wish them to be and it’s not always because of ‘development’. Maybe the Collberg example is because Collberg didn’t deserve a better spot in the lineup. Norlinder had plenty of time to prove himself. There is absolutely nothing wrong with giving Kapanen some NHL games and then returning him to Timra. He proved he is a capable NHL player at an already young age and will further work on his game there.

Most people don't seem to know or understand shit about development. The Collberg example was because it came directly from Timmins. Norlinder it's because on this board when we signed him, I said it was a mistake and that he wasn't ready so I added it because he was 100% in the same situation in regards to staying here or waiting till December and then sending him to Laval. I have said over and over all last year everything was on him for looking lazy and disinterested.

Kapanen to me did not look NHL ready, his strength, speed, skating all look like they still need a good bit of work, why then was he in the NHL, was he suddenly going to become a better skater or quicker or stronger? Why did they have to bring him over, mess with his season when he could have been on the top line in the SHL and then we'll see how the year goes. You get 4 years with Euros, why not use that to your advantage?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1909

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad