Senor Catface
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2006
- 16,397
- 21,250
He was playing with Caggiula and Pederson on the 1st line.
It might have been early 2024 instead of late 2023.
Maybe, but December it was 100 percent Tullio and McKegg
He was playing with Caggiula and Pederson on the 1st line.
It might have been early 2024 instead of late 2023.
He wasn't because he wasn't performing to stay there, it's part of the issue is doingNear the end of 2023 he was playing on a line with Tullio and McKegg. Mckegg, with his 7 goals and 29 points in 63 games.
You must be thinking of 1st line because of how the lines were listed on Twitter before gameday. But he certainly was not on the "1st" line at the end of 2023.
He wasn't because he wasn't performing to stay there, it's part of the issue is doing
Fair enough, what's done is done, this was the right move for the franchise moving forward.Right, but I was just detailing who he was playing with for the end of the year.
I'd say third or fourth behind Savoie, O'Reilly and maybe Akey.hey oilers fans, where would you put Jarventie in your prospect rank?
For the Sens he probably would have been our 5th best prospect.
Read this type of comment many times. When Wallstedt becomes a regular NHL goalie you will have reason but now he has 3 games of NHL experience. 2 against bottom feeders and 7 ga when playing Dallas.this trade makes me more mad at the trade where we acquired XB rights. I know many of us prefered Wallsted over the trade that happened
it takes goalies longer and how many games in the NHL do the guys we got in the trade have? 0. When the trade happened, those who were happy were saying that XB would have 2 seasons under his belt by Wall made the NHL.Read this type of comment many times. When Wallstedt becomes a regular NHL goalie you will have reason but now he has 3 games of NHL experience. 2 against bottom feeders and 7 ga when playing Dallas.
Not to nitpick, but he has 7 NHL games. Not zero.how many games in the NHL do the guys we got in the trade have? 0.
Not sure I see any similarities in their games.Jarventie seems like a lesser version of McLeod. Hopefully a bit more scoring but lesser player in every other sense.
Somewhere between Perlini and Elias Petterson. Much closer to Perlini tho hahaJarventie seems like a lesser version of McLeod. Hopefully a bit more scoring but lesser player in every other sense.
Jarventie seems like a lesser version of McLeod. Hopefully a bit more scoring but lesser player in every other sense.
I'd say third or fourth behind Savoie, O'Reilly and maybe Akey.
It's not just Bourgault; all of our recent prospects were not given top 6/top pair ice time. Even Holloway and Broberg were slow-played, pushed to lower lines/pairings, and kept down for seasons before they finally forced their way to the NHL club.I would say it’s more of a reflection of the prospect not being able to earn top 6 ice time in the AHL. Which is consistent with what he’s done since being drafted.
It's not just Bourgault; all of our recent prospects were not given top 6/top pair ice time. Even Holloway and Broberg were slow-played, pushed to lower lines/pairings, and kept down for seasons before they finally forced their way to the NHL club.
Oh so they earned ice time.It's not just Bourgault; all of our recent prospects were not given top 6/top pair ice time. Even Holloway and Broberg were slow-played, pushed to lower lines/pairings, and kept down for seasons before they finally forced their way to the NHL club.
It's not just the ice time; it's also playing with players who can excel together. Like another poster said XG was playing with Caggiula and Pederson, NHL skillsets aren't going to develop and flourish under those conditions.To this end, I agree to a certain extent, but a player has to perform when they are on the ice. Edmonton used to gift entitled 1st round picks ice time, in the decade of darkness. Players earn ice time and push their way into the NHL, not "Hey you were a 1st rounder, here's some cherry PP time for you."
And now they're RFAs when they finally break the roster. Yay, well done on player development and maximizing ELCs.Oh so they earned ice time.
There's the key difference. They performed in a role lower in the lineup and forced their way up. Borgault didn't, which makes sense because he isn't close to as good a player in talent and performance as the other two.
Are you suggesting we throw them in the NHL like we used to do?It's not just the ice time; it's also playing with players who can excel together. Like another poster said XG was playing with Caggiula and Pederson, NHL skillsets aren't going to develop and flourish under those conditions.
Will be interesting to see if anything changes, Playing Savoie with similar players would be criminal.
And now they're RFAs when they finally break the roster. Yay, well done on player development and maximizing ELCs.