BruinsBtn
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2006
- 22,080
- 13,548
I'd give up a haul for this guy.
A #1C making $5.25m. That's a major piece.
A #1C making $5.25m. That's a major piece.
Tweets , articles and interviews of hockey insiders discussing the availability of Chychrunwhere do you get he is worth 3 firsts.............
Yes from the Nucks, IMO. Smith isn't the type of D we need as we already have Hughes and Rathbone coming up, both playing the similar style of game as Smith. I guess we can either move Smith or Rathbone later on if they become redundant. But Mercer is going to be an excellent 2C behind Petey long term. I'll happily take this deal.Carolina , Rangers , Avs ,Panthers .
Not saying they would need JT but they technically are contenders with assets that could be used.
Is it for sure a contender that he goes to?
My Devils need a player of this type . Only way that it makes sense though is if he resigns for sure. No point giving up assets for 2 years while the Devils are still going to be crappy for at least one more year.
It gives the Devils some actual veteran presence and someone that can actually score on the PP and knows how to PK .
would any combination of this work?
2022 1st (top 2 protected )
Mercer
Holtz
Ty Smith
Severson
Bahl
Foote
Zacha
Okhotyuk
Boqvist
Mercer would be the last one I’d want to trade but I’m guessing him or Holtz would be a must included in a deal.
Mercer Smith and a 2nd ?
It looks like there’s certainly a bidding war going on, I can’t blame teams, it’s not every day at top 20 Top line player, Who plays three positions, costs only 5 million for 1.5 years, And can win face-offs like nobody’s business.
This is not a rental, should get a huge haul.
More likely the Canucks have contacted him about possibly re-tooling and asked him if he wants to be here long term. He’s an UFA after next season and the Canucks aren’t a contender, they gotta decide if he’s a fit long term.
I wonder if the Bruins somehow got Klingberg, would they part with Carlo for Miller one for one? I don't know the situation in Boston so this might be way off, but I always envision Carlo as the perfect D-partner for Hughes. He is still young enough to be part of our core if/when our next cup window opens.The cost is going to be outrageous but the idea of Hall-Miller-Pastrnak is quite tantalizing.
If we retain 50% on Miller then yes minimum is high end prospect + 1st + small add or 3 1sts value + small add. If we arent retaining on Miller, the main reason Coleman returned 2 late 1sts is the extra year and that its only 1.8M which makes it extremely easy to fit on a cap strapped team. 2 1sts + 2nd value is the minimum for Miller at full salary. I'd expect these teams would have to send salary back in the form of a roster player like Compher for the Avs, Lindgren from NYR, Demelo from WPG that could be flipped for an additional 3rd round pick.
Mark Stone returned a high end prospect + 2nd. Stone was a UFA to be but thats 2 1sts + 2nd value. i'd say Miller at full salary for 1.5 years is about as valuable as Mark Stone for 0.5 years. Miller might get a little more due to the term.
Lets say Canucks were the powerhouse contender. Would you trade Podkolzin + 1st + Hamonic for a JT Miller at 5.25M for 1.5 years? Probably not. We'd be offering 1st + Rathbone/Klimovich + 2nd +
I love Mercer so that’s a deal I absolutely takeCarolina , Rangers , Avs ,Panthers .
Not saying they would need JT but they technically are contenders with assets that could be used.
Is it for sure a contender that he goes to?
My Devils need a player of this type . Only way that it makes sense though is if he resigns for sure. No point giving up assets for 2 years while the Devils are still going to be crappy for at least one more year.
It gives the Devils some actual veteran presence and someone that can actually score on the PP and knows how to PK .
would any combination of this work?
2022 1st (top 2 protected )
Mercer
Holtz
Ty Smith
Severson
Bahl
Foote
Zacha
Okhotyuk
Boqvist
Mercer would be the last one I’d want to trade but I’m guessing him or Holtz would be a must included in a deal.
Mercer Smith and a 2nd ?
I can't imagine Bo Horvat is happy about this, he's in his prime years and would want to try to make a run at making the playoffs this year not build for the future.
I hope none of the Canucks players are happy about the way this season, last season or almost any of the last decade of seasons have gone.I can't imagine Bo Horvat is happy about this, he's in his prime years and would want to try to make a run at making the playoffs this year not build for the future.
There’s potentially motivation to move on other than just the return with either explanation. That makes this a bit different than dangling him just to potentially cash out, which was my initial point.
Which is fine. He can go too.I can't imagine Bo Horvat is happy about this, he's in his prime years and would want to try to make a run at making the playoffs this year not build for the future.
Well they’re definitely doing their due diligence and I’m sure Rutherford will have a price that has to be met in order to move him. There’s the option of dealing him at the draft where all 31 other teams could be interested in him if he’s willing to extend at that point.
I keep seeing "if we retain 50%, the return will be higher" type comments. Isn't significant retention pretty much a given right now in this flat cap environment? How many top teams can even take him on without significant retention?
Top 10 teams the NHL right now (Points %):
Carolina: Need retention
Colorado: Need retention
Florida: Doesn't need retention, but also doesn't really need JT Miller given their stacked forward line-up.
TB: Need retention
NYR: Do NOT need retention (for this year), but likely do because of next year.
TOR: Need retention
MIN: Do NOT need retention
PIT: Need retention?
WSH: Need retention?
STL: Need retention?
Now, instead of retention there are other ways to get cap space, but of the viable candidate, it looks like only the MIN and NYR's can accept Miller without retention, and NYR are likely going to want retention for next year.
If pretty much every team is going to want retention, then how does that add to the trade value?
you're assuming rather than listening to your fellow posters. If you read anything of what other fanbases have said, overwhelming majority have stated guys like Schneider/Newhook weren't available and were non starters for trade talks for Eichel IRL and here. So with that in mind sure we'd want those guys and are willing to retain on Miller to get them, but its a want and hope that other fanbases want no part of. They have also said if thats the price on Miller at 50%, they'd rather no ret on Miller.im assuming if hes going to a contender he would be retained. the player he is and the aspect of having him at 2 and change is why id be looking at 3 peices or high end and a 1st.
yes, if the canucks were a powerhouse contender id trade that for miller. its basically 2 pieces and a cap dump. hamonic is nothing to write home about.
Theres also taking roster players back in trade. Salary retention is definitely not a must and will cost more since the ret is dead cap space. A roster player is a tradeable or useable piece. If Vegas can fit Eichel's 10M with no ret, teams can fit Miller's 5.25M with no retI keep seeing "if we retain 50%, the return will be higher" type comments. Isn't significant retention pretty much a given right now in this flat cap environment? How many top teams can even take him on without significant retention?
Top 10 teams the NHL right now (Points %):
Carolina: Need retention
Colorado: Need retention
Florida: Doesn't need retention, but also doesn't really need JT Miller given their stacked forward line-up.
TB: Need retention
NYR: Do NOT need retention (for this year), but likely do because of next year.
TOR: Need retention
MIN: Do NOT need retention
PIT: Need retention?
WSH: Need retention?
STL: Need retention?
Now, instead of retention there are other ways to get cap space, but of the viable candidate, it looks like only the MIN and NYR's can accept Miller without retention, and NYR are likely going to want retention for next year.
If pretty much every team is going to want retention, then how does that add to the trade value?
I'd give up a haul for this guy.
A #1C making $5.25m. That's a major piece.
Name me 30 centers that are producing better than Miller. Bet you cant.Where? I thought we were talking about JT Miller?