(Official) Around the NHL 8.0

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dertell

Registered User
Jul 14, 2015
2,925
479
Only thing good for us with the Ehrhoff contract is if Franson comes here cheap because of the market.
 
May 27, 2012
17,070
856
Earth
Only thing good for us with the Ehrhoff contract is if Franson comes here cheap because of the market.

I would welcome it as well. The only thing I wouldn't like is Smid and Engelland as the 7th and 8th Dmen. 5M+ on two players sitting in the pressbox is horrid.
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,725
11,426
Really unsure on why Franson hasn't been signed yet. Is he just being too picky? I can't see no teams being interested in him.

I have a feeling he wants a longer term contract, and not many teams are willing to give it to him after the saga with the Preds.

It'd be great if Calgary could give Franson a one year deal for cheap.

Who knows if Smido will be available for the start of the season and Engels could be moved at half salary. There was a large market for him last summer.
 

Dertell

Registered User
Jul 14, 2015
2,925
479
I would welcome it as well. The only thing I wouldn't like is Smid and Engelland as the 7th and 8th Dmen. 5M+ on two players sitting in the pressbox is horrid.
Having either one of them on the ice is even more horrid. I doubt Nakladal was signed for more AHL depth and we all hope Wotherspoon gets a spot anyway.
 

Calculon

unholy acting talent
Jan 20, 2006
16,578
4,035
Error 503
Can't imagine the Flames being interested in Franson. Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton and Wideman are all safe bets to produce offensively and Russell is no slouch. Substituting Engelland with Franson would also result in a complete lack of truculence from the back end; can't see that happening either.

Both Smid and Engelland are untradeable at this stage. No team in this cap climate is going to be interested in bottom pairing/press box defensemen with hefty cap hits and multiple years left on their contracts. Especially one with concussion issues.

And Treliving will be cognizant of needing to keep spots available for the likes Wotherspoon, Morrison, Nakladal and other prospects. No need to return to a Sutter era reputation of burying prospects for mercenary free agents.
 

Dertell

Registered User
Jul 14, 2015
2,925
479
Can't imagine the Flames being interested in Franson. Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton and Wideman are all safe bets to produce offensively and Russell is no slouch. Substituting Engelland with Franson would also result in a complete lack of truculence from the back end; can't see that happening either.
Not sure you implied Russell is good offensively or not but in case you did: he had 0.28 primary points/60 at even strength last season (0.44 in all situation combined). His shooting% was way too low even for a defenseman so he'll probably score a few more goals next season but still, Russell is bad at producing offensively.

Not a big fan of going after Franson; would rather go after Wiercoch. But on a 1-year deal, it's a different story. And Engelland's "truculence" is barely existent; he's too slow to get the proper gap distance to make those hits and as a result, he was more of a stop post than a physical presence.
Both Smid and Engelland are untradeable at this stage. No team in this cap climate is going to be interested in bottom pairing/press box defensemen with hefty cap hits and multiple years left on their contracts. Especially one with concussion issues.
Well, duh. At this point it's more about "out of ice, out of mind" than trading the two.

And Treliving will be cognizant of needing to keep spots available for the likes Wotherspoon, Morrison, Nakladal and other prospects. No need to return to a Sutter era reputation of burying prospects for mercenary free agents.
Doesn't really work if Smid and Engelland are #6 and #7.
 
Last edited:

Lunatik

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2012
57,815
9,852
Can't imagine the Flames being interested in Franson. Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton and Wideman are all safe bets to produce offensively and Russell is no slouch. Substituting Engelland with Franson would also result in a complete lack of truculence from the back end; can't see that happening either.

Both Smid and Engelland are untradeable at this stage. No team in this cap climate is going to be interested in bottom pairing/press box defensemen with hefty cap hits and multiple years left on their contracts. Especially one with concussion issues.

And Treliving will be cognizant of needing to keep spots available for the likes Wotherspoon, Morrison, Nakladal and other prospects. No need to return to a Sutter era reputation of burying prospects for mercenary free agents.
Smid has neck issues, not concussion issues. And that Sutter era reputation is a narrative that [mod: is] completely inaccurate. It's time to accept facts, lots of kids got opportunities but our prospect pool sucked so they never became much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Calculon

unholy acting talent
Jan 20, 2006
16,578
4,035
Error 503
Not sure you implied Russell is good offensively or not but in case you did: he had 0.28 primary points/60 at even strength last season (0.44 in all situation combined). His shooting% was way too low even for a defenseman so he'll probably score a few more goals next season but still, Russell is bad at producing offensively.

Russell can't exactly be categorized as an offensive defensemen but the 20 to 30 points he'll put up as the teams number four or five defensemen is more than good enough.

Not a big fan of going after Franson; would rather go after Wiercoch. But on a 1-year deal, it's a different story. And Engelland's "truculence" is barely existent; he's too slow to get the proper gap distance to make those hits and as a result, he was more of a stop post than a physical presence.
Maybe, but management has made it clear they want a guy like that on defense. They've made it clear they're not going to ice a team incapable of pushing back. Pure fantasy hockey to to go for the names instead of trying to build a functioning, diverse roster. Engelland is mediocre to bad, sure, but it's pretty much a guarantee that when his time is done, his replacement will be in a similar mold (but hopefully better).

Well, duh. At this point it's more about "out of ice, out of mind" than trading the two.
Well, good luck with that. If they're not injured/on LTIR, and there's no legitimate reason to think either will be to start the season, keeping both as healthy scratches means risking an extra forward (e.g. Shore or Jooris) on waivers. And that's not happening either. Nor is it all that realistic to suggest that ownership would consent to paying either Smid or Engelland's NHL salaries while they toil in the AHL.

Doesn't really work if Smid and Engelland are #6 and #7.
Still better than if they're #7 and #8.
 

Anglesmith

Setting up the play?
Sep 17, 2012
46,717
15,124
Victoria
Sharks sign Frazer McLaren. Well, we might as well just give in to the 2016 Pacific division champion San Jose Sharks. No point in even playing. :sarcasm:

Kind of seems weird that they didn't just re-sign John Scott, who was apparently a favourite in the locker-room.
 

Johnny Hoxville

The Return of a Legend
Jul 15, 2006
37,560
9,364
Calgary
As much as I didn't mind Engelland last year, it would have been cool to sign Franson this offseason to fill that spot on the team. I'm guessing you could probably get Franson today for 3 year, @ 3 per, which is essentially what we signed Engelland for last offseason. Engelland is better in his own end no doubt, but Franson has a canon of a shot and is more truculent IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad