InfinityIggy
Zagidulin's Dad
I will continue to take a wait a see approach.
Same, but there is essentially no risk to this contract as its only 1 year.
I will continue to take a wait a see approach.
definitely no risk, but still won't call it greatSame, but there is essentially no risk to this contract as its only 1 year.
If his wrist is better he should be fine IMO.
That feel when Bouma makes more than Semin
Who would have predicted that?
It was somewhat expected. If GM's thought he was worth more than 2.2 Million he would have been signed earlier. Could have been other factors, but he got bought out so his value is low.
Pretty much everyone. Many thught Semin was KHL bound, others didn't think he would get a million.That feel when Bouma makes more than Semin
Who would have predicted that?
Holtby got 6.1m for 5 years, good deal I think.
Given it's a 5 years deal, it's fantastic for a goalie like him. In general? I'm not sure, good goalies tend to be overpaid.Holtby got 6.1m for 5 years, good deal I think.
Given it's a 5 years deal, it's fantastic for a goalie like him. In general? I'm not sure, good goalies tend to be overpaid.
That feel when Bouma makes more than Semin
Who would have predicted that?
Price's 6.5M$ deal was done a few years ago and before his numbers went nuts. Lundqvist/Rask is the new standard. I would rather save 4M$ of cap space usable to get guys who can prevent shots from reaching the goalie than add a whoopin 0.01 SV%. Especially considering how less shots against usually mean more shots for so more offense to boot.I think they're paid a little low, if anything. When you think about the difference between a top-end goalie making about $6M (like the Price/Rinne/Holtby's of the world) and a next-tier goalie making around $3M (like the Ramo's of the world), you typically would expect a drop-off of about 0.020 on the SV%. If you accept that 30 shots against per game is the norm, then that's nearly one goal per game difference. So the difference in price tag by that logic ought to be similar to the price tag of a 60-point scorer, right?
However, it's been a while since a top-end goalie has been re-upped on a long-term deal, so I imagine the market will be corrected over the next few years. I mean, Lundqvist comes to mind making $8.5M, and that will probably be the elite standard going forward.
Price's 6.5M$ deal was done a few years ago and before his numbers went nuts. Lundqvist/Rask is the new standard. I would rather save 4M$ of cap space usable to get guys who can prevent shots from reaching the goalie than add a whoopin 0.01 SV%. Especially considering how less shots against usually mean more shots for so more offense to boot.
This is why I thought it was a good idea to try to get Martin Jones; nothing like Lundqvist but very good underlying numbers hinting at a very high potential and very cheap for the cap. Too bad he wasn't quite as cheap to trade for.
There are reasons to believe Martin Jones is not just a system player. His AHL numbers were better than the other wildcards traded this summer (Talbot and Lehner) and his underlying numbers from the 2013-14 season were spectacular (1st in the league against high-danger shots, 5th vs middle-range and average vs low danger). It seems like the Kings knew all this given how much they really wanted him to be far away from the division. Bonus: He's also 25 so there's still much room for improvements.Hard to gauge what will happen to goalies when they switch systems, though. We'll see this season with San Jose, but as other posters were saying with regards to Kiprusoff in another thread, Darryl Sutter's system does seem to help goalies out.
And I guess that's another thing that's unique about goalies and why maybe they should be paid less than position players. They can be so hot and cold and unpredictable.
These contracts that keep coming up makes Brodie's look like highway robbery!
These contracts that keep coming up makes Brodie's look like highway robbery!