Apoplectic Habs Fan
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2002
- 30,343
- 19,369
DD is not the only one not raising his game at crucial times. I hope hés gonna be dealt away. No more ****ing stupid threads about him.
Whoa is davey.
DD is not the only one not raising his game at crucial times. I hope hés gonna be dealt away. No more ****ing stupid threads about him.
Was talking with a co-worker this morning, and he said he would give Subban (+picks/prospects) for Edmonton's first to fix our offense.
At first, I thought he was crazy, but then the more I think about it, I'm not sure anymore.
Let's say EDM would listen, would you guys do it to get McDavid?
We cannot have a transition year with Therrien behind the bench. He's simply far too stubborn to change his ways or his beliefs. He will not play youth unless they play his way. He will not change his perception of players. He will continue to over-depend on his favourites. He will continue to preach 'da system', which will continue to put an unfair burden on Price and stagnate development of key future pieces of our lineup, most importantly Galchenyuk & Beaulieu, and continue to get less out of players like Eller & even Subban himself than they are capable of delivering.I mean, I think I'm not the only one who would be okay with an actual transition year, as opposed to some mindless nonsense about it that simply isn't true.
And Therrein needs to go.
Hard to argue with that.This team makes me sad.
Sorry goal is to win a cup
Coaching is still a major weakness along with many roster issues.
Its a message board to discuss the team. A team who took a step back this year and certain players like markov and pleks are getting older.
have an opinion. Why are you here if all you wanna do is heap praises for a second round exit.
That's complete BS, Eller's creativity is circling the zone protecting the puck, it ends there. He plays hockey in a tunnel.
how many teams per year are not winning a Cup ? Even teams with better coaches and players never won a SC. I would had preferred a longer run, but I am realistic, which is something you are not. This team is not built yet to battle to the end. Any superior coaches according to your set of criterias would not had achieved more with this current team.
Again, i said mtl wouldnt win anything countless times without upgrading in many areas. How was i unrealistic.
your continued propaganda you spew about people believing its just davey and mt as issues is bordering trolling.
You purposely ignore when people write pleks and markov may need to be moved because they also mention davey and mt. Then you say "why is it always daveys fault"
Heck i mention it, and its back to therrien and davey
What are the rules for coaches? Can MB talk to Babcock without firing Therrien first? Like just a private quick chat to see his interest? Or get a guy like Carey to talk to his Olympic coach and see his interest. If Babcock is interested you promote Therrien to Vice President of some ******** and sack his coaching staff. Go hard after Babcock we should easily be his top choice if the money is there. Let Mike choose his coaching staff.
Trade Desharnais, Parenteau and Emelin for scraps, resign Petry and go after a top 6 winger
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk-Sharp/UFA
Camp Standout-Eller-Gallagher
DLR-Plekanec-DSP
Prust-Mitchell-Weise
Beaulieu-Subban
Markov-Petry
Tinordi-Gilbert
Pateryn
Price
Tokarski
Wouldn't mind finding a taker for Pleky either in a deal for a 3C+
We get a real transition year finally for our youth
i see the team as a whole, not as a set of individual pieces with some favourites and some hated components.
All you do is defend two people.
Either Therrien or Desharnais goes, at the very least. Can't see an easier way this team can contend.
the team won't be better overnight even if these two guys are gone.
Yeah. This was the outcome I dreaded most. With a Hart-calibre season from Price, we either needed to go all the way and win that Cup now, or flame out hard, preferably in R1, to get Therrien canned. We ended up with neither, and we're highly likely to go into next season with minimal changes as a result. Which just means we're highly likely to be right back in this same position next May. Which is highly depressing.the crappy thing in all of this is that we won just enough playoff games for Therrien to be secure in his position. I wouldn't have minded being swept by the Bolts if it guaranteed a new coach with a new approach to the team. humph!
the team won't be better overnight even if these two guys are gone.
the team won't be better overnight even if these two guys are gone.
Plekanec put up 60 points this year. You can say whatever you want about playoffs but if you move out a guy like that and plug Eller in his spot, you probably end up out of the playoffs or at best needing all your spare change just to finish 7th or 8th.
Yes, Eller didn't play with great linemates, but that's in large part because he is a poor playmaker and not very creative. Also being on the 3rd line, a lot of those goals were scored against weaker players.
I think people on here massively underestimate how hard it is to put up 60 points in today's NHL. Galchenyuk is a very talented player and in his 3rd year, did not reach 50 points this year with similar offensive opportunities as Plekanec minus the defensive heavy lifting.
how many teams per year are not winning a Cup ? Even teams with better coaches and players never won a SC. I would had preferred a longer run, but I am realistic, which is something you are not. This team is not built yet to battle to the end. Any superior coaches according to your set of criterias would not had achieved more with this current team.
I agree with your entire list except for Tinordi. No way. I think it would be a mistake.
You think Plekanec is a good playmaker???
Galchenyuk similar offensive opportunities???
Am I watching the same team???
the team won't be better overnight even if these two guys are gone.